Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

S22 2023 #3

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023
Merged

S22 2023 #3

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023

Conversation

HampSwe
Copy link
Contributor

@HampSwe HampSwe commented Nov 1, 2023

No description provided.




\end{document}
Copy link
Contributor

@fnurkla fnurkla Nov 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Allting efter här borde tas bort.


\subsubsection{Anmodanden}
Till LKG gäller samma prioritetsordning för anmodan som
i \ref{icke-gasque}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punkt i slutet av en mening.

Till nollegasque ska följande erhålla en inbjudan:
\begin{itemize}
\item inspektorn och inspektrix, samt
\item hedersmedlemmar
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punkt efter hedersmedlemmar.

@HampSwe HampSwe requested a review from fnurkla November 7, 2023 10:09
@fnurkla
Copy link
Contributor

fnurkla commented Nov 7, 2023

Om det inte är allt för jobbigt skulle jag rekommendera dig att rebasea och squasha fixcommiten med den för S22.

Annars är det fine.

…ns användning

Samt åtgärda fel enligt review
@HampSwe HampSwe merged commit b570e93 into main Nov 7, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants