Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Patch index parsing #538

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Patch index parsing #538

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

Karl-Svard
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed

  • Update the way indexes are parsed in order to comply with new naming format.

Steps to consider while deploying

  • Configuration changes:
  • Documentation updates:
  • Inform users by email:

Review:

  • Code approved by
  • Tests executed on stage by: (Document the test done with screen shots and description.)
  • "Merge and deploy" approved by

This version is a:

  • MAJOR - when you make incompatible API changes
  • MINOR - when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner
  • PATCH - when you make backwards compatible bug fixes or documentation/instructions

@Karl-Svard Karl-Svard marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 09:43
AbiDalby
AbiDalby approved these changes Oct 1, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@AbiDalby AbiDalby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice!

@Karl-Svard Karl-Svard merged commit 547e9eb into master Oct 1, 2024
2 checks passed
@Karl-Svard Karl-Svard deleted the kapa_csv_patch branch October 1, 2024 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@AbiDalby AbiDalby AbiDalby approved these changes

@idalindegaard idalindegaard Awaiting requested review from idalindegaard idalindegaard is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Karl-Svard @AbiDalby