-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Warn if ASA is used in combination with events #2097
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2097 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 76.51% 54.38% -22.13%
============================================
Files 81 33 -48
Lines 14853 5516 -9337
============================================
- Hits 11365 3000 -8365
+ Misses 3488 2516 -972
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
‚ne‘ counts discontinuities in the rhs and x. Discontinuities in the rhs are fine with adjoint sensitivity analysis as long as the trigger function is not parameter dependent.
Ok, thanks. As this is not apparent from the generated model module, and i don't feel like storing it there - how do we want to handle that?
|
Hmm rephrase warning and state that it might not apply to the model at hand, i.e. 1.? |
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fröhlich <fabian.frohlich@crick.ac.uk>
#18