add_watermark

[kvhoab2111982]

Pull Request Title (short and descriptive)

Description

Added successfully add_watermark function

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant and mark the one that applies:

• Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactoring (code improvements or updates without changing functionality)

Related Issue(s)

List any related issues:

• Closes #ISSUE_ID

Proposed Solution

Describe the approach taken to implement the solution.

Checklist

Please review the checklist below and mark items as complete as applicable:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have added necessary unit tests that verify the functionality.
• All new and existing tests pass locally.
• I have checked that no other open PRs address this issue.

Screenshots (if applicable)

Include any screenshots or additional visual aids that might help with the review.

Additional Information

Add any other context about the pull request @Tinny-Robot

[kvhoab2111982]

@Tinny-Robot, I have done my task, can you check that.

[Tinny-Robot]

hello @kvhoab2111982,
Thank you for your contribution and effort in implementing the add_watermark function! The functionality works as intended for text watermarks and is a valuable addition to the project. Your code is structured and achieves the task effectively. However, there are areas for improvement that need to be addressed to meet the quality standards and ensure the feature is complete and maintainable.

---

1. Code Quality

• Strengths: The code runs well and performs the task of overlaying a watermark on a video. Your implementation is straightforward and easy to follow.
• Improvements Needed:
  • The Pylint score of 6.30 is below the acceptable threshold of 8.0. Key areas for improvement include:
    • Adding file-level docstrings to explain the purpose and functionality of the file.
    • Avoiding leaving commented-out code in the PR. Please remove these to maintain a clean codebase.
    • Reintroducing any deleted code unless its removal is necessary and justified.
  • Be mindful of code style and adherence to project standards to ensure maintainability.

---

2. PR Description

• It's essential to always update the PR description to provide a clear summary of what the PR implements and why. This helps reviewers and team members understand the purpose of your changes at a glance. Currently, the description contains placeholder text, which makes it unclear.

---

3. Test Cases

• While your test cases are functional, they are returning warnings. This doesn’t block the PR but should ideally be addressed to ensure the test suite remains clean and free of unnecessary noise.

---

4. Feature Implementation

• Your implementation of text watermarks works well, but the feature requirements also specify support for image watermarks. Please extend the functionality to handle both text and image watermarks to fully meet the requirements.

---

Actionable Recommendations:

1. Improve the Pylint score by adding missing docstrings, cleaning up commented code, and adhering to code quality guidelines.
2. Update the PR description to accurately reflect the changes and their purpose.
3. Address warnings in the test cases (optional but recommended).
4. Add support for image watermarks in the add_watermark function to complete the feature.

---

Final Note: Thank you once again for your effort and contribution! Once these changes are addressed, the PR will be much closer to approval. Feel free to reach out if you need clarification or assistance on any of the points above.