Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2021. It is now read-only.

Working hypotheses

Nicole Fenton edited this page May 10, 2016 · 6 revisions

Assumptions

  • Transformation is not as risky as government agencies may perceive it to be.

  • Transformation doesn’t have an end point; you work on it continually. The process varies, but nobody is starting at zero.

  • Changing culture to be more open and agile makes government services more user-centered and builds trust.

  • There’s not one right way to do this work.

Barriers

  • People / relationships / communication

  • Conflicting priorities (e.g., not a clear direction, internal pressure to take action without planning first)

  • Cultural barriers to user-centered design (e.g., solutioneering, unclear audience, unclear user needs)

  • Budget

  • Legal concerns, risk aversion

  • Fear of more work

  • Fear of failure, doing the wrong thing, or not knowing enough

  • Technology can’t solve everything (i.e., need to look at the process and deeper issues)

Potential outputs

  • Teams need practical advice with specific takeaways, and a clear picture of organizational change since this is a big, messy problem.

  • Teams need examples and a practical framework for making a plan.

  • Teams need some access to a community of practice to ask questions and share what they’ve learned.