Skip to content

Unauthorized Access After Organization or Project Deactivation

Moderate
livio-a published GHSA-jj94-6f5c-65r8 Sep 19, 2024

Package

ZITADEL (ZITADEL)

Affected versions

<2.54.9, <2.55.7, <2.56.5, <2.57.4, <2.58.4, <2.59.2, <2.60.1, 2.61.0, 2.62.0

Patched versions

2.62.1, 2.61.1, 2.60.2, 2.59.3, 2.58.5, 2.57.5, 2.56.6, 2.55.8, 2.54.10

Description

Summary

In Zitadel, even after an organization is deactivated, associated projects, respectively their applications remain active. Users across other organizations can still log in and access through these applications, leading to unauthorized access.
Additionally, if a project was deactivated access to applications was also still possible.

Details

The issue stems from the fact that when an organization is deactivated in Zitadel, the applications associated with it do not automatically deactivate. The application lifecycle is not tightly coupled with the organization's lifecycle, leading to a situation where the organization or project is marked as inactive, but its resources remain accessible.

PoC

  • Create a new Organization, create new project and setup OpenID connect.
  • Deactivate an Organization
  • Setup authentication without selecting Check for Project on Authentication
  • User is able to login despite the organization is deactivated

Impact

This vulnerability allows for unauthorized access to projects and their resources, which should have been restricted post-organization deactivation.

Patches

2.x versions are fixed on >= 2.62.1
2.61.x versions are fixed on >= 2.61.1
2.60.x versions are fixed on >= 2.60.2
2.59.x versions are fixed on >= 2.59.3
2.58.x versions are fixed on >= 2.58.5
2.57.x versions are fixed on >= 2.57.5
2.56.x versions are fixed on >= 2.56.6
2.55.x versions are fixed on >= 2.55.8
2.54.x versions are fixed on >= 2.54.10

Workaround

Unpatched versions can explicitly disable the application to make sure the client is not allowed anymore.

Questions

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please email us at security@zitadel.com

Credits

Thanks to @prdp1137 for reporting this!

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2024-47060

Weaknesses

No CWEs

Credits