We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The rule described at https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-manager/content/using/custom-code-quality-rules.html?lang=en#product-apis-annotated-with-providertype-should-not-be-implemented-or-extended-by-customers that ProviderType interfaces must not be implemented (or according classes must not be extended) would be helpful to have in SonarQube already. That way issues otherwise only detected in Cloud Manager could be detected already with custom CI hooked up with SonarQube.
ProviderType
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The rule described at https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-manager/content/using/custom-code-quality-rules.html?lang=en#product-apis-annotated-with-providertype-should-not-be-implemented-or-extended-by-customers that
ProviderType
interfaces must not be implemented (or according classes must not be extended) would be helpful to have in SonarQube already. That way issues otherwise only detected in Cloud Manager could be detected already with custom CI hooked up with SonarQube.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: