BPC::Workflows:: feedback from Ewa Delmann

[henricasanova]

• The workflow definition is maybe a bit narrow, assuming only file-based communications. TODO: add one of sentence.

• It would be good to have a search capability across the various modules, and links to definitions if any—for example is the concept of a critical path defined anywhere? At some point I found the glossary, but it did not jump out at me. I think a link with the concept highlighted would be more prominent, also may have more context. TODO: tooltips to glossary definitions from links in the narratives

• It would be good to describe the goal of the simulations, what are you looking for? Should you run with various params and compare? How would you do this? TODO: see if one explanation sentence can be added for each simulation, and make it clear that practice questions are linked to the simulation.

• When running simulations, the parameters and the information in the graphs need to be described. The resizing of graphs is also confusing, at one time I did not notice there was more data but the original view did not show it.

  • TODO: zoom disabled by default, and button for enabling it in the graph
  • TODO: add a question mark icon next to the the graph HTML label, which pops up an explanation tooltip

[rafaelfsilva]

Tooltips can now be added to simulation graphs, by simply adding the tooltip parameter:

{% include partials/host_utilization_graph.html prefixID="io" tooltip="Host utilization graph for I/O simulation" %}