You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for the newly developed UIMNF approach and the well documented tutorials. We are interested in applying this approach to integrate mouse and human snRNAseq brain datasets specifically split across cell types. In the documentation for the runIntegration(), two parameters k and lambda determine the overall integration. While the defaults probably work well with most datasets, I am wondering if there is any guidance to optimize these parameters for specific dataset before running the pipeline. Typical approach would be to test with different combinations of the values for these parameters, but since the datasets are really large, are there any approaches to estimate these parameters based on dataset structure (number of features, samples, known annotations etc) ? Alternatively, would we expect to get comparable results when using a subset of the data to test parameters versus using entire dataset ? Thank you for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thank you for the newly developed UIMNF approach and the well documented tutorials. We are interested in applying this approach to integrate mouse and human snRNAseq brain datasets specifically split across cell types. In the documentation for the
runIntegration()
, two parametersk
andlambda
determine the overall integration. While the defaults probably work well with most datasets, I am wondering if there is any guidance to optimize these parameters for specific dataset before running the pipeline. Typical approach would be to test with different combinations of the values for these parameters, but since the datasets are really large, are there any approaches to estimate these parameters based on dataset structure (number of features, samples, known annotations etc) ? Alternatively, would we expect to get comparable results when using a subset of the data to test parameters versus using entire dataset ? Thank you for your help!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: