Spec needs to list at least one editor for publication as W3C Technical Report

[tidoust]

On the way to First Public Working Draft, I just realized that the Editor's Draft does not list any spec editor. I suppose that's intended. Now, the W3C Process requires that specs be edited by one or more editors (who must participate in the group):

Every Technical Report published as part of the Technical Report development process is edited by one or more editors appointed by a Group Chair. [...] An editor must be a participant, per § 3.4.2 Participation in Chartered Groups in the Group responsible for the document(s) they are editing.
https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#publication

That rule is enforced by the pubrules checker, so publication as First Public Working Draft is currently blocked on this. Who may I put as editor(s)?

[jgraham]

On 11/18/24 17:09, François Daoust wrote: On the way to First Public Working Draft, I just realized that the Editor's Draft does not list any spec editor. I suppose that's intended.

Yes :) But if we have to I suppose it makes sense to list me as an editor. There are others with significant contributions both of text and review who may also want to be listed.

[OrKoN]

The guidance says that the editors are appointed by the group chair? I would like to nominate myself and @sadym-chromium to be listed as well.

[sadym-chromium]

W3C User of @sadym-chromium: https://www.w3.org/users/128970