Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tweak the concept of "draw" in 2.5.8 understanding for the spacing checks #4057

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Tweak the concept of "draw" in 2.5.8 understanding for the spacing checks #4057

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke commented Sep 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Admittedly, not sure this is absolutely necessary, but hopefully this allays concerns raised in the original issue.

Closes #3895

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke changed the title Tweak the concept of "draw" in 2.5.8 for the spacing checks Tweak the concept of "draw" in 2.5.8 understanding for the spacing checks Sep 7, 2024
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 798b61a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/wcag2/deploys/673ef4c024a6fb0008547433
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4057--wcag2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

bruce-usab
bruce-usab requested changes Sep 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@bruce-usab bruce-usab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like all the edits except first one, "possible" to "theoretically possible".

Maybe "conceptually possible" or leave as-is? With the other edits, I do not think "draw" will be taken as a concrete literal requirement.

@bruce-usab
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed 9/13, minor change on call. Move to Ready for approval.

@mbgower
Copy link
Contributor

mbgower commented Nov 21, 2024

This was date-stamped as being sent for WG approval on oct 10. I have left that stamp in place, but noting here that it was sent as part of the Nov 20 changes to the working group.

@detlevhfischer
Update target-size-minimum.html
a41b77f 
Very very minor, take it or don't...
@detlevhfischer
Copy link
Contributor

Made a very minor editing suggestion in a PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bruce-usab bruce-usab bruce-usab approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) Editorial Understanding
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2.5.8 Understanding "draw" language
4 participants
@patrickhlauke @bruce-usab @mbgower @detlevhfischer