Conflict in Document identifier information ordering, between pubrules and sample document

[svgeesus]

The sample CRD document does not follow pubrules.

It has

<details>
        <summary>More details about this document</summary>
      <dl>
        <dt>This version:</dt><dd>
                <a class="u-url" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CRD-hr-time-2-20210915/">https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CRD-hr-time-2-20210915/</a>
              </dd><dt>Latest published version: (@@note that version is not required in the latest version)</dt><dd>
                <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/hr-time/">https://www.w3.org/TR/hr-time/</a>
              </dd>
        <dt>Latest editor's draft:</dt><dd><a href="https://w3c.github.io/hr-time/">https://w3c.github.io/hr-time/</a></dd>
        <dt>History:</dt><dd><a href="https://www.w3.org/standards/history/hr-time-2">https://www.w3.org/standards/history/hr-time-2</a></dd>
        <dt>Test suite:</dt><dd><a href="https://wpt.fyi/hr-time/">https://wpt.fyi/hr-time/</a></dd>
        <dt>Implementation report:</dt>(@@required, or indicate no implementation report in SOTD)<dd>
                <a href="https://wpt.fyi/hr-time/">https://wpt.fyi/hr-time/</a>
              </dd>

              <dt>Editor:</dt>
              <dd class="p-author h-card vcard" data-editor-id="56102">George Herald
                  (WebFoo)
                </dd>
              <dt>
                      Former editors:
                    </dt><dd class="p-author h-card vcard" data-editor-id="45726">James Hector
                  (BAR Inc.)
                 (Until January 2015)</dd><dd class="p-author h-card vcard" data-editor-id="44357">Joe Smith (Iron Corp.)
                 (Until February 2014)</dd>

           <dt>Feedback:</dt>
           <dd><a href="https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/issues">https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/issues</a></dd>
           <dd><a href="mailto:public-web-perf@w3.org?subject=%5Bhr-time%5D%20YOUR%20TOPIC%20HERE">public-web-perf@w3.org</a> with subject line “<kbd>[hr-time] <var>… message topic …</var></kbd>” (<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/" rel="discussion">archives</a>)</dd>
     </dl>
      </details>

while pubrules says

 Document identifier information **must** be present in this order:

    'This version' - URI to that version
    'Latest version' - URI to the latest version. See also the (non-normative) Version Management in W3C Technical Reports for information about "latest version" URI and version management.
    'History' - URI to the history of the specification
    Editor(s)
    Feedback - GitHub repository issue links are required in the <dl>after <dt>Feedback:</dt> in the headers (<div class="head">) of the document. Links are expected to be of the form https://github.com/<USER_OR_ORG>/<REPO_NAME>/[issues|labels][/…].)

Notice that pubrules does not give a location for the Editors Draft, Implementation report nor Test Suite.

[jennyliang220]

Hi @svgeesus, Pubrules currently doesn't check the location of 'Editors Draft, Implementation report nor Test Suite' links. You could put them in any order, or consider using the order of the mockup

@plehegar, is there any specific order preferred for these links?

[plehegar]

@plehegar, is there any specific order preferred for these links?

"This Version", "Latest version" should appear first.
"History" could appear 3 or 4, depending on whether the editor's draft link is there or not.
Beyond that, I'm not sure if we want to impose an order.

[svgeesus]

Beyond that, I'm not sure if we want to impose an order.

Ok, so the fix is to clarify pubrules which claims there is a required order

Document identifier information must be present in this order:

[svgeesus]

Also note the sample CRD document cited above does not have a "Latest version:" link