HTML-AAM: @title on <abbr> and <dfn> needs to be covered in name calculation

[jasonkiss]

From @cyns on January 12, 2016 23:54

Copied from original issue: w3c/aria#199

[jasonkiss]

From @MichielBijl on January 13, 2016 8:38

Is this the case for anchors?

[jasonkiss]

From @cyns on January 13, 2016 23:18

Anchors seem different. Abbr and dfn provide strings to replace or augment the target, which seem like they should be part of how the name and description are calculated.

Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:38:58 -0800
From: notifications@github.com
To: aria@noreply.github.com
CC: cynthia_shelly@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [aria] HTML-AAM: @title on and needs to be covered in name calculation (#199)

Is this the case for anchors?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[jasonkiss]

From @MichielBijl on January 14, 2016 8:14

+1

—Michiel

On 14 Jan 2016, at 00:18, cyns notifications@github.com wrote:

Anchors seem different. Abbr and dfn provide strings to replace or augment the target, which seem like they should be part of how the name and description are calculated.

Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:38:58 -0800
From: notifications@github.com
To: aria@noreply.github.com
CC: cynthia_shelly@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [aria] HTML-AAM: @title on and needs to be covered in name calculation (#199)

Is this the case for anchors?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[jasonkiss]

Pinging @cyns just in case...

Is the intent of this issue that title on abbr and dfn needs to participate in the name and description computation differently from how it is currently documented under 5.15 Text Level Elements Not listed Elsewhere?

[scottaohara]

related - w3c/aria#2292