Skip to content

Issues: w3c/EasierRDF

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

Would an RDF "living standard" be a good idea? standards Standardization should address this
#88 opened Aug 24, 2021 by pchampin
Who consumes RDF data?
#77 opened Sep 29, 2020 by awwright
replace "IRI" in spec language?
#75 opened Jun 24, 2020 by dhh1128
Idea: Record stronger alternative definitions of ease Category: big ideas For major ideas that span multiple issue categories
#68 opened Apr 26, 2019 by sbp
Do not use anonymous classes Category: usage For issues around RDF usage in practice
#65 opened Apr 1, 2019 by azaroth42
Mappings between shape languages Category: related standards For RDF-related standards
#64 opened Mar 30, 2019 by VladimirAlexiev
Retain relative URIs at the RDF model level Category: language features For language features of RDF itself -- model and syntax
#62 opened Mar 28, 2019 by dbooth-boston
Simplified Reification Category: language features For language features of RDF itself -- model and syntax
#61 opened Mar 26, 2019 by chiarcos
transparently switch between CWA and OWA Category: related standards For RDF-related standards
#60 opened Mar 20, 2019 by chiarcos
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.