Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inverted Blacklist AKA Whitelist Instead #14

Open
ylluminate opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Inverted Blacklist AKA Whitelist Instead #14

ylluminate opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ylluminate
Copy link

I'd like to take an opposite approach to DoctorDark. Can we have a feature that will allow you to flag apps to have DoctorDark apply to? It seems that given the various problems that arise, it would be a superior approach to just not apply itself to any application unless specifically instructed to do so. That way we can work more sanely on apps as we go in terms of implementing dark functionality.

@w0lfschild
Copy link
Owner

Seems like a reasonable idea.

@w0lfschild w0lfschild self-assigned this Jul 6, 2017
@KTsarlz
Copy link

KTsarlz commented Aug 14, 2017

This. I just disabled because of various problems, whitelisting would be a better approach imho.

@InDoubt
Copy link

InDoubt commented Sep 9, 2019

Wanted to ask for the same thing. Looked around to avoid redundancy and here I'm!
I second this idea too!
As is, Doctor Dark doesn't work in my iMac-27" High Sierra (un-upgradeable anymore). DD is applied using MacForge, but I'm unable to blacklist using Doctor Dark GUI. It just doesn't work at all!

I'm looking for to give "Photos" app the dark interface iPhoto has (Had to switch because iPhoto has been broken with the last iOS.)
So would you please consider checking also the possibility to make dark (invert test/background) some elements not responding to the scheme, please?
Thank you!

Screen Shot 8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants