-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
data from SDM120M incomplete #340
Comments
I just recognized that the current docker image is already 4 years old. I will try in the next days to build my own one using the current master branch and give it a try. Maybe it is time for a new version :) |
So, I had some time. I have created a new docker image locally, based on the current master branch. Running So, still open:
|
https://hub.docker.com/r/isarrider/mbmd/tags |
@isarrider am I missing an open PR that did not get merged? |
nah, I just wanted to give @sicheste and others a docker image that isnt old... |
Thank you. Would be happy for build workflow PR- don't have the time... |
I know the feeling but I am always hoping for the young IT Students or similar... |
If I add the SDM120M as
SDM220
to the config, I will not get all values. Especially thePower (W)
is missing. If I add it as aSDM
I get this value.As
SDM220
:As
SDM
:Btw: What is the
name
field in the config for? The name (hereSDM2201.3
andSDM1.3
is constructed by type + position in the alphabetically sorted list of sensors +.
or-
+ bus id. Thus the names in the API and MQTT are unstable.Btw2:
docker run volkszaehler/mbmd scan -a 192.168.2.11:502
did not detect the SDM120.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: