You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a few questions about the evaluation protocol in your paper. Would you please provide me with more details on the evaluation process on the test set of Fashion Dataset? and how to get the quantitative results in Table 1?
To me, a reasonable evaluation process may be, for example, there are 100 videos in the test set of the Fashion dataset. For cross-video motion transfer, we can choose the first frame of one video as the source frame, and another video from the rest 99 videos as the driving video, then 99 videos will be generated. Therefore, there will be 9,900 synthesized videos in total. For self-imitation or intra-video synthesis, 100 videos will be generated by setting the driving video as the same one. Then we can calculate the evaluation metrics on these 10,000 videos. Is this a reasonable evaluation process? or Could you please clarify the evaluation protocol in your paper? For the evaluation metric, is it calculated on each generated video or on all the generated frames?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, Thank you for sharing the DwNet code.
I have a few questions about the evaluation protocol in your paper. Would you please provide me with more details on the evaluation process on the test set of Fashion Dataset? and how to get the quantitative results in Table 1?
To me, a reasonable evaluation process may be, for example, there are 100 videos in the test set of the Fashion dataset. For cross-video motion transfer, we can choose the first frame of one video as the source frame, and another video from the rest 99 videos as the driving video, then 99 videos will be generated. Therefore, there will be 9,900 synthesized videos in total. For self-imitation or intra-video synthesis, 100 videos will be generated by setting the driving video as the same one. Then we can calculate the evaluation metrics on these 10,000 videos. Is this a reasonable evaluation process? or Could you please clarify the evaluation protocol in your paper? For the evaluation metric, is it calculated on each generated video or on all the generated frames?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: