dali backend device parameter setting question

[frankxyy]

The dali.py file content is as below:

import nvidia.dali as dali
from nvidia.dali.plugin.triton import autoserialize
import nvidia.dali.types as types

@autoserialize
@dali.pipeline_def(batch_size=1, num_threads=1, device_id=0)
def pipe():
    images = dali.fn.external_source(device="cpu", name="INPUT_0")
    shape_list = dali.fn.external_source(device="cpu", name="INPUT_1")
    images = dali.fn.decoders.image(device="mixed", images, device="mixed", output_type=types.RGB) # The output of the decoder is in HWC layout.
    images_converted = dali.fn.color_space_conversion(device="gpu", images, image_type=types.RGB, output_type=types.BGR)
    images = dali.fn.resize(device="gpu", images_converted, resize_y=shape_list[0, 2]*shape_list[0, 0], resize_x=shape_list[0, 3]*
                            shape_list[0, 1])
    images = dali.fn.crop_mirror_normalize(device="gpu", images,
                                           dtype=types.FLOAT,
                                           output_layout="CHW",
                                           scale=1.0/255,
                                           mean=[0.485 * 255, 0.456 * 255, 0.406 * 255],
                                           std=[0.229, 0.224, 0.225])

    return images, shape_list

A peculiar circumstance I found is that if I donot set the device parameter for the color_space_conversion, resize and crop_mirror_normalize operator, the latency will boost to 90ms(comparing to 40ms when explicitly setting the device parameter to 'gpu'). I assumed that if the device parameter is not set, the default gpu to gpu behavior will be selected as the input of the three operators are all in gpu memory, but the program running result reveals that my assumption may be wrong. I am wondering why does this happen?

[banasraf]

Hi @frankxyy
As you assume, adding device='gpu' argument to those operators shouldn't change anything, because they receive gpu input and their placement is inferred to be on gpu.
Can you tell me more how do you measured that latency? Did you use perf_analyzer or your custom script? What parameters did the measurements have?