You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A nice feature of LSD is to allow users to specify the range of the dates in case of uncertainty. So you have b(x,y) for date range (x,y); u(x) for (-inf, x) and l(x) for the range (x,+inf). While this is OK, I think this notation of b, u, l is not intuitive and quite difficult to remember.
Why not just use the same math notation I wrote above?
An even easier solution for biologists (who are not mathy) is to use the range notation in R, because many biologists nowadays know R:
x:y for the range (x,y)
You can extend this format, say x: or x:NA if the upper bound is +inf and :y or NA:y if the lower bound is -inf. (NA for not available).
I prefer this format, which is more user-friendly.
What do you think? It is possible to implement this in LSD?
Perhaps you can still allow the b, u, l notation at the same time, for backward compatibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A nice feature of LSD is to allow users to specify the range of the dates in case of uncertainty. So you have
b(x,y)
for date range(x,y)
;u(x)
for(-inf, x)
andl(x)
for the range(x,+inf)
. While this is OK, I think this notation ofb, u, l
is not intuitive and quite difficult to remember.Why not just use the same math notation I wrote above?
An even easier solution for biologists (who are not mathy) is to use the range notation in R, because many biologists nowadays know R:
You can extend this format, say
x:
orx:NA
if the upper bound is +inf and:y
orNA:y
if the lower bound is -inf. (NA for not available).I prefer this format, which is more user-friendly.
What do you think? It is possible to implement this in LSD?
Perhaps you can still allow the b, u, l notation at the same time, for backward compatibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: