You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 4, 2018. It is now read-only.
Is it possible (theoretically first of all) to operate on a local files.db - so that (static) files.db is on the client side, while files are located on the server?
Background is: my music collection is on a HDD is connected to a router that has only an extremly slow USB connection. This is fast enough to stream mp3, but navigation with a 30..120MB files.db (covering my collection) is extremly slow or impossible. I could imagine that this speeds up navigation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sounds simular indeed. But I think it points to cache the real content, not the database (files.db) with references to content.
(For me the thousands of mp3 files are content, the files.db is to navigate and control)
I think caching would be possible but at the moment I've not enough spare time to work on the project. The project needs some refurbishment, too. If you are interested maybe contribute some code?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Is it possible (theoretically first of all) to operate on a local files.db - so that (static) files.db is on the client side, while files are located on the server?
Background is: my music collection is on a HDD is connected to a router that has only an extremly slow USB connection. This is fast enough to stream mp3, but navigation with a 30..120MB files.db (covering my collection) is extremly slow or impossible. I could imagine that this speeds up navigation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: