Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of DataMemory/StackMemory #17

Closed
3 tasks done
thegabriele97 opened this issue Jun 6, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31
Closed
3 tasks done

Implementation of DataMemory/StackMemory #17

thegabriele97 opened this issue Jun 6, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested TO DO

Comments

@thegabriele97
Copy link
Owner

thegabriele97 commented Jun 6, 2021

  • Implementation of DataMemory/StackMemory.
  • Discuss about merging the two memory into one
  • The DataMemory should load the .data segment from the asm file (maybe, let's see, as the IRAM does for the .code segment)

The DataMemory width should be on 8 byte maybe (?) or anyway, there is to discuss about instructions like load/store byte, half, word, double word and see how they can be implemented

  • Adding piepepile register as memory output in the DP
  • Implementation of DataMemory
  • Implementation of StackMemory
@thegabriele97 thegabriele97 added the PRO DLX New feature or request label Jun 6, 2021
@thegabriele97 thegabriele97 added TO DO and removed PRO DLX New feature or request labels Jun 6, 2021
@thegabriele97 thegabriele97 changed the title Implemenetion of DataMemory/StackMemory Implementation of DataMemory/StackMemory Jun 7, 2021
@thegabriele97 thegabriele97 added the question Further information is requested label Jun 7, 2021
@thegabriele97 thegabriele97 pinned this issue Jun 7, 2021
@thegabriele97 thegabriele97 linked a pull request Jun 11, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested TO DO
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants