Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better integration with AppDB #16

Open
tdviet opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Better integration with AppDB #16

tdviet opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tdviet
Copy link
Owner

tdviet commented Mar 23, 2021

No description provided.

@tdviet tdviet added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 23, 2021
@enolfc
Copy link
Collaborator

enolfc commented Jul 15, 2021

Possible integration points: use images from AppDB instead of the local names / ids

@tdviet
Copy link
Owner Author

tdviet commented Jul 21, 2021

Openstack commands accepts only local names/IDs, however, that can be easily retrieved using appliance title or other properties (appliance IDs, MPURI, ...) in AppDB, for example:

fedcloud openstack image list --property "dc:title"="Image for EGI Docker [Ubuntu/18.04/VirtualBox]" --site CESNET-MCC  --vo eosc-synergy.eu -c ID -f value
a0f85909-e117-4463-bea7-78ed06d160e3
6c379889-58af-4d8f-addb-3ad91f87a5ea

We can add some new parameters for better integration with AppDB, e.g. "--appliance-title TITLE", and internally converting the parameter to "--image local-id". However, there are several issues:

  • Some sites have duplicated images (like CESNET_MCC above, two images with the same title)
  • Some sites have images without properties (like IFCA-LCG2)

Until that is clarified, it would be better to do the conversion in external script that is easier to debug.

BTW, why several properties are duplicated, e.g. "APPLIANCE_TITLE" and "dc:title" properties, they have the same value.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants