You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, recently, we have done some improvements on TIMIT:
Average PER 15.58% (15.08% min.) on the core test set. fMLLR, 4x1024 LSTM, http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07974 It is going to be presented at TSD2018 next week.
Further, we had boosted the result by NN ensembled and by the regularization post-layer in SPECOM 2018 (18.-22. September). Average PER 14.84% (14.69% min.) https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07186
Hi, recently, we have done some improvements on TIMIT:
Average PER 15.58% (15.08% min.) on the core test set. fMLLR, 4x1024 LSTM, http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07974 It is going to be presented at TSD2018 next week.
Further, we had boosted the result by NN ensembled and by the regularization post-layer in SPECOM 2018 (18.-22. September). Average PER 14.84% (14.69% min.) https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07186
In addition, we share ready-to-try python scripts here:
https://github.com/OrcusCZ/NNAcousticModeling
To be fair, we had found a nice result of average PER 14.9% by Ravanelli with fMLLR and a M-reluGRU based NN, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.00641
Thanks, Jan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: