Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support complex numbers in DG routines #6252

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

nilsvu
Copy link
Member

@nilsvu nilsvu commented Aug 27, 2024

Proposed changes

This completes the support for complex numbers in the DG code.

Upgrade instructions

Code review checklist

  • The code is documented and the documentation renders correctly. Run
    make doc to generate the documentation locally into BUILD_DIR/docs/html.
    Then open index.html.
  • The code follows the stylistic and code quality guidelines listed in the
    code review guide.
  • The PR lists upgrade instructions and is labeled bugfix or
    new feature if appropriate.

Further comments

@nilsvu nilsvu force-pushed the complex_numbers branch 5 times, most recently from b26e191 to 9cf3b04 Compare August 28, 2024 20:35
@nilsvu nilsvu requested a review from wthrowe August 28, 2024 20:36
@nilsvu nilsvu force-pushed the complex_numbers branch 4 times, most recently from 03380f4 to 48eb48b Compare August 29, 2024 02:47
@nilsvu
Copy link
Member Author

nilsvu commented Aug 30, 2024

@wthrowe would you be able to take this one?

@nilsvu
Copy link
Member Author

nilsvu commented Aug 30, 2024

I also have a full integration test using the elliptic DG operator on a complex equation. I was going to add that in the next PR, but could push it here too if you prefer.

void test_with_random_values(
const DataVector& used_for_size,
Tensor<DataVector, Symm,
Tensor<DataType, Symm,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Call the test function with the new type.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@wthrowe
Copy link
Member

wthrowe commented Aug 30, 2024

I think you messed up rebasing or something. You added a bunch of new commits that don't seem to compile.

@nilsvu
Copy link
Member Author

nilsvu commented Aug 30, 2024

Oh sorry here's the fixup

@wthrowe
Copy link
Member

wthrowe commented Sep 3, 2024

Looks good. Squash.

@wthrowe wthrowe merged commit 6904c42 into sxs-collaboration:develop Sep 4, 2024
21 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants