Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

et_cnt 显示为0 #18

Open
zhangsong1213 opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

et_cnt 显示为0 #18

zhangsong1213 opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@zhangsong1213
Copy link

No description provided.

@zhangsong1213 zhangsong1213 changed the title et_cnt et_cnt 显示为0 Jun 19, 2019
@zhangsong1213
Copy link
Author

我用自己的数据集 进行训练 当训练到第4轮的时候 et_cnt一直显示为0
BEST MAE: 3.6, BEST MSE: 4.2, BEST MODEL: mtl_fish_2.h5
epoch: 5, step 0, Time: 0.0046s, gt_cnt: 0.0, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 5, step 500, Time: 0.0133s, gt_cnt: 11.0, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 5, step 1000, Time: 0.0125s, gt_cnt: 4.8, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 5, step 1500, Time: 0.0122s, gt_cnt: 8.9, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 6, step 0, Time: 0.0030s, gt_cnt: 4.0, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 6, step 500, Time: 0.0112s, gt_cnt: 1.0, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 6, step 1000, Time: 0.0106s, gt_cnt: 10.7, et_cnt: 0.0
epoch: 6, step 1500, Time: 0.0101s, gt_cnt: 1.6, et_cnt: 0.0

@Veefas
Copy link

Veefas commented Mar 3, 2021

@zhangsong1213 你好,我用MCNN训练自己的数据集没有问题,切换到cascaded就碰到和你一样的问题,et_cnt一直为0,我觉得应该和分组类别有关,作者默认分组类别为10,我修改成4还是不行。请问你后面解决了嘛?

@Veefas
Copy link

Veefas commented Mar 3, 2021

Hi @svishwa , when I train my own datasets(about grape counting), the et_cnt value always 0.0. I think it might be caused by the number of groups. I've changed the number of groups in both the CrowdCounter and loss function, which are failed. Could you give me some guidance?

By the way,my preprocessed dataset can be trained successfully on MCNN.

@pasquale90
Copy link

pasquale90 commented Apr 29, 2021

Hello! I am facing the same issue when I try to train my own labeled dataset.
Could there be any potential clues on what exactly is happening? producing zero estimating count in my point of view indicates that the model isn't able to identify the count in the image and while stuck there forever may indicate that the model isn't able to learn the pattern in the new data.

At least if any raw assumptions or directions on what changes should we look into would may prove very beneficial..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants