Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Article IDs #1332

Open
JGilbert-eLife opened this issue Jul 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Article IDs #1332

JGilbert-eLife opened this issue Jul 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
erudit Érudit Issues feature-request A formal Texture feature specification

Comments

@JGilbert-eLife
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

The unique identifiers for an article (internal publisher ID, DOIs etc)

User stories

  1. As an author, I should be able to see the article ID so that I can use it for reference in conversation with production staff.

Production staff

  1. As production staff, I should be able to see the DOI so that I know what it will be upon publication.
  2. As production staff, I should be able to edit the DOI so that I can correct any errors.

But what if . . . ?

Consideration

  • The eLife article numbers are currently five digits long but this may need to increase in the future.
  • Érudit and SciELO and others will not have such a clear structure for their article numbers and will need letters, numbers and special characters allowed in this field, so it be not restricted.
  • The article number and DOI can be related or unrelated so no logic should be built on them being the same or similar values.
  • eLife predefines its DOIs and registers them with Crossref ahead of publication; SciELO and Érudit define their DOIs at the point of publication.

XML requirements

article-id elements with an appropriate @pub-id-type. Captured as a child of article-meta.
eLife has two:

<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">12345</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.12345</article-id>

SciELO uses one:

<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/abd1806-4841.20197235 </article-id>

Érudit currently has none (added later on in the workflow using a different process)

Mock ups

Proposal

@JGilbert-eLife JGilbert-eLife added the feature-request A formal Texture feature specification label Jul 1, 2019
@fabiobatalha fabiobatalha added the erudit Érudit Issues label Aug 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
erudit Érudit Issues feature-request A formal Texture feature specification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants