Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate the formulas involving alpha #15

Open
stla opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Investigate the formulas involving alpha #15

stla opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@stla
Copy link
Owner

stla commented Feb 16, 2023

See here and here.

I don't remember why I use these transformation formulas. And I'm wondering whether they should be swapped (following an observation during the development of my Haskell package; I fixed a failure by swapping these two lines).

@simonp0420 Do you remember why I use these formulas? Why not using the "direct" formulas, without these transformations involving the alpha function?

@simonp0420
Copy link
Contributor

I think this was added when you were reviewing my original PR. See this comment.

@stla
Copy link
Owner Author

stla commented Feb 17, 2023

Thanks. I didn't read yet. I've just tried to replace these formulas in my R package with the "direct" formulas and some unit tests have failed, those related to some Weierstrass functions. So it looks like these formulas have an advantage. Need to investigate more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants