You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hello,
thanks for sharing your code.
i'm trying to reproduce results but not getting similar accuracy.
steps i took:
download the folder 'hcp_tc_npy_22' from the google drive link that you supplied.
run the preprocessing.py script after configuring the folders.
run the 'run_training.py' script.
i made minor changes such as configuring 'adj_matrix.npy' isntead of 'adj_matrix_qingyu.npy'. (since this adj_matrix is generated automatically in the preprocessing.py script)
the accuracy doesn't go over 55%. what can possibly explain this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hello again,
changing to net.st_gcn improved results up to 75-77% accuracy (:
is it possible that the adjacency matrix 'adj_matrix_qingyu.npy' is causing better performance as seen in your paper?
maybe you can give details about how to reproduce this matrix if so.
thanks!
hello,
thanks for sharing your code.
i'm trying to reproduce results but not getting similar accuracy.
steps i took:
i made minor changes such as configuring 'adj_matrix.npy' isntead of 'adj_matrix_qingyu.npy'. (since this adj_matrix is generated automatically in the preprocessing.py script)
the accuracy doesn't go over 55%. what can possibly explain this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: