Skip to content

[HW3] Reasonable accuracy Problem 2.2 #142

Answered by seominjoon
dinhkt asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote
  1. What you tried is reasonable, and other possible ideas are: partial shuffing, missing letter, etc.
  2. One way is to just use the same model as 2.2, but you will need a new data for training.

Replies: 1 comment 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@dinhkt
Comment options

@seominjoon
Comment options

Answer selected by dinhkt
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants