Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add jq tool to coordinator-api #1539

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

sbaizet-ledger
Copy link
Member

Purpose or design rationale of this PR

Describe your change. Make sure to answer these three questions: What does this PR do? Why does it do it? How does it do it?

PR title

Add jq tool to coordinator-api image, used by a script to parse the response of the /health endpoint

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
  • docs: Documentation-only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Deployment tag versioning

Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?

  • No, this PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag
  • Yes

Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

  • No, this PR is not a breaking change
  • Yes

@colinlyguo
Copy link
Member

Would it better to move jq to base image?

@sbaizet-ledger sbaizet-ledger merged commit 41ce22b into develop Oct 15, 2024
10 checks passed
@sbaizet-ledger sbaizet-ledger deleted the add-jq-tool-to-coordinator-api branch October 15, 2024 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants