Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relicense uefi-rs under dual MIT/Apache-2.0 #1470

Open
73 of 81 tasks
nicholasbishop opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 72 comments
Open
73 of 81 tasks

Relicense uefi-rs under dual MIT/Apache-2.0 #1470

nicholasbishop opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 72 comments

Comments

@nicholasbishop
Copy link
Member

nicholasbishop commented Nov 10, 2024

To improve compatibility with the Rust ecosystem, we are planning to relicense all the code in the uefi-rs repo under the MIT/Apache-2.0 licenses.

This will affect the uefi-raw, uefi-macros, and uefi crates, as well as all other code in this repo.

We need all contributors to agree to this license. (If any contributors do not agree, we may still proceed with the relicense, but with those contributions removed.) Note that this relicensing will not affect existing releases; they will always be available under the existing MPL-2.0 license.

To agree to this relicense, please leave a comment with the following message:

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

Thanks all for your help with this!

Contributors

@nicholasbishop
Copy link
Member Author

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@nicholasbishop nicholasbishop pinned this issue Nov 10, 2024
@Freax13
Copy link
Member

Freax13 commented Nov 10, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

5 similar comments
@JarlEvanson
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@gz
Copy link
Contributor

gz commented Nov 10, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@baloo
Copy link
Contributor

baloo commented Nov 10, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@Andy-Python-Programmer
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@Bobo1239
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@RaitoBezarius
Copy link
Contributor

RaitoBezarius commented Nov 10, 2024 via email

@HTGAzureX1212
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

2 similar comments
@ctrlaltmilk
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@bjadamson
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@nicholasbishop
Copy link
Member Author

(I think Github only pinged the first 50 names in the description, so pinging the rest here.)

To improve compatibility with the Rust ecosystem, we are planning to relicense all the code in the uefi-rs repo under the MIT/Apache-2.0 licenses.

To agree to this relicense, please leave a comment with the following message:

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@roblabla
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

7 similar comments
@toku-sa-n
Copy link
Member

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@veluca93
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@upsuper
Copy link
Contributor

upsuper commented Nov 10, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@LightAndLight
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@stevefan1999-personal
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@pratyai
Copy link
Contributor

pratyai commented Nov 10, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@ocadaruma
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@iankronquist
Copy link
Contributor

iankronquist commented Nov 11, 2024 via email

@zdivelbiss
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

7 similar comments
@gelven4sec
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@raccog
Copy link
Contributor

raccog commented Nov 11, 2024 via email

@felipebalbi
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@timrobertsdev
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@e820
Copy link
Contributor

e820 commented Nov 11, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@JonahPlusPlus
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@StevenDoesStuffs
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@bjorn3
Copy link
Contributor

bjorn3 commented Nov 11, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

19 similar comments
@BinaryTENSHi
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@phil-opp
Copy link
Member

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@hughsie
Copy link
Contributor

hughsie commented Nov 11, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@gurry
Copy link
Contributor

gurry commented Nov 11, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@HadrienG2
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@d-sonuga
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@nkaretnikov
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@diekmann
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@Stzx
Copy link
Contributor

Stzx commented Nov 11, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@blitz
Copy link
Contributor

blitz commented Nov 11, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@IsaacWoods
Copy link
Member

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@wangrunji0408
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@NathanRoyer
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@andre-braga
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@josephlr
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@AtsukiTak
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@foxcob
Copy link
Contributor

foxcob commented Nov 12, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@kendase3
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@Redrield
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@tomoyat1
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.


Thank you to the maintainers for all of their dedicated work!

@cmoylan
Copy link
Contributor

cmoylan commented Nov 16, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

3 similar comments
@3than3
Copy link
Contributor

3than3 commented Nov 17, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@sdemos
Copy link
Contributor

sdemos commented Nov 17, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@stillinbeta
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@nicholasbishop
Copy link
Member Author

Friendly ping! We are still looking for sign-off from the following contributors:

@AdrianDanis
@FredrikAleksander
@JeffLi01
@YtvwlD
@imtsuki
@medhefgo
@nsemmel
@pavlus
@rexlunae
@sky5454
@supdrewin
@zhangpf

@AdrianDanis
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

1 similar comment
@FredrikAleksander
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@YtvwlD
Copy link
Contributor

YtvwlD commented Nov 20, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

(Even though I think copyleft licenses are better.)

@imtsuki
Copy link
Contributor

imtsuki commented Nov 22, 2024

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests