Common links & group KPIs:
- These reports: https://github.com/rphair/cip-editing
- Discord invite to CIP Editors Meetings: https://discord.gg/kyaTyzkBqd
- CIP open pull requests: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pulls
- CIP open issues: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/issues
Quantitative contributions:
- GitHub activity overview: @rphair
- CIP pull requests @rphair involved in, by last update time
- CIP issues @rphair involved in, by last update time
New category of CIP PRs and issues: extensions to CIP-0088; see
- discussion of new potential standards being added: cardano-foundation/CIPs#790 (comment)
- new GitHub label visible here: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/labels/CIP-0088%3A%20new%20extension
Continuing & completing my own update of CIP-0001 to help manage lists of co-authors & workshop attendees to define how these should appear without overwhelming the CIP body text:
- (for CIP-1694) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#763 (comment))
- (Discord: suggesting for other proposals) (https://discord.com/channels/971785110770831360/992011119872970762/1214634845939171398)
- (for CIP-0100; Ryan is handling other proposals) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#776)
- (for foreign language versions) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#777)
Continuing & completing my further update of CIP-0001 to ensure all CPS files have a proper open source license (an item originaly missing from the CPS specification in CIP-9999):
Administrative fixes to CIP formats affecting compatibility with derived sites (e.g. the Dev Portal) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#773)
Discord: we've "fixed" CIP-1694 by popular demand that the attendees list for all the workshops was overwhelming at the beginning ofthe proposal & moved it to the end (cardano-foundation/CIPs#763); but there was a suggestion that this might also be true for other CIPs, so I'm polling devs to see which ones that might be (candidates so far: CIP-0100 and CIP-0108).
Thanks to GitHub support (and without editors having admin privileges on CIPs repository), removed all comments from the repo's most notorious and repeated spammer (therefore this search no longer shows any results) (https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3ACeliaparra)
#206 - CIP-0030 | deprecate signTx & add chain signing
#209 - CIP-0030 | Adding optional networkId parameter to .enable
#323 - CIP-0030 | Add chain id to differentiate between testnets
- with Ryan, confirmed that proposals have become out of scope for Cardano Wallet API and can be closed after long period of inactivity
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#206 (comment))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#209 (comment))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#323 (comment))
#309 - CIP-0038? | Arbitrary Script as Native Script spending conditions
- Evidence this proposal has been deprecated (giving some notice to author before closing & will double check with community advocates) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#309 (comment))
#444 - CIP-0113? | Programmable token-like assets
- Inviting author to continue work on this proposal, after having taken it over from a previously abandoned proposal, after some heated discussion in the community (cardano-foundation/CIPs#444 (comment))
#611 - CPS-0009? | Coin Selection Including Native Tokens
- Merging after declaring (uncontested) that community has reached unanimity on how this issue has been documented, so further work can continue on related CIPs (cardano-foundation/CIPs#611 (comment))
#687 - CIP-0021 | Conway update
- Going on record that this has effectively passed all review except the final changes co-editor Ryan has recommended (cardano-foundation/CIPs#687 (comment))
#742 - CPS-0011? | Universal JSON Encoding for Domain Types
- Confirming editorial approval & ensuring that Ryan is OK to merge (as the proposal's last technical challenger) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#742 (comment))
#747 - CIP-0117? | Explicit script return values
- Assigning CIP number after favourable review in meeting (cardano-foundation/CIPs#747 (review))
#749 - CIP-0112? | Observe script type
- Removing template scaffolding (important to keep CIPs clean from irrelvant markup & comments) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#749 (review))
- Approving & ensuring MPJ from Plutus Team thinks implementation checklist is sufficient (cardano-foundation/CIPs#749 (review))
#751 - CPS-0014? | Register of CBOR Tags
#752 - CIP-0114? | CBOR Tags Registry
#753 - CIP-0115? | CBOR tag definition - ED25519-BIP32 Keys
- Merging as fully compliant with CIP process (meetings + GitHub review)
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#751 (review))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#752 (review))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#753 (review))
#766 - CIP-0116? | Universal JSON Encoding for Domain Types
- Inviting author to introduce at CIP meeting; assigning CIP number afterward (cardano-foundation/CIPs#766 (comment))
- Correcting a syntax error in code sample (cardano-foundation/CIPs#766 (comment))
#767 - CIP-???? | New Plutus Builtin DropList
- Double checking CIP-0035 compliance with Plutus team, especially for benchmarking (cardano-foundation/CIPs#767 (comment))
#768 - CIP-0057 | Include Plutus V3
- Polling community about whether updating schema would cause problems (cardano-foundation/CIPs#768 (comment))
- Merging based on consensus = OK (cardano-foundation/CIPs#768 (review))
#770 - CIP-0057 | Fix schema validation error (strict mode)
- Fixing GitHub problem from author's parallel branch (cardano-foundation/CIPs#770 (comment))
- Merging this update with consensus (cardano-foundation/CIPs#770 (review))
#774 - CIP-0069 | single argument Scripts
- Introducing at CIP meeting (cardano-foundation/CIPs#774 (comment))
#779 - CPS-0015? | Intents for Cardano
#780 - CIP-0118? | Validation zones
- Launching CIP review process for CPS introducing new technology on Cardano, progressing to candidate proposals (still "on drawing board" from Michael Peyton Jones)
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#779 (review))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#780 (comment))
- Qualifying that this is a
ToolsCPS (since needs ecosystem support for what will be made possible in the Ledger) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#779 (review)) - Helping maintain civil & unbiased discourse when implications for alternative trading models turns into a heated debate (cardano-foundation/CIPs#780 (comment))
#784 - CIP-0069 | add Datum to ScriptContext
- Channeling online review into meeting discussion on concurrent (and sometimes competing) Plutus proposals
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#784 (comment))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#784 (comment))
#785 - CIP-???? | Coin Selection - Optimized Random Improve
- Initial review, identifying general format & language deficiencies relative to other CIPs (though idea itself is useful & well documented) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#785 (review))
- Introducing to dev community at CIP meeting (cardano-foundation/CIPs#785 (comment))
#787 - CPS-0009 | Add link to Cardano Wallet coin selection library
- Quick update to current state of the art re: coin selection in wallets (cardano-foundation/CIPs#787 (review))
#788 - CIP-0119? | Governance Metadata - DReps
- First review beginning a series of demanding technical & procedural reviews to follow (cardano-foundation/CIPs#788 (review))
- Vital question over whether Governance tool providers will be obligated by the CIP itself to censor objectionable content:
#790 - CIP-???? | Dynamic Asset Resale Fees
- Introducing via CIP meeting; review re: concordance with CIP-0088 (result: not required at this stage) (cardano-foundation/CIPs#790 (review))
#769 - CIP-0069: alternative approach
- Gathering interested parties across Plutus teams, with Ledger reps for related implications, to contribute to this issue & introducing at CIP meeting
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#769 (comment))
- (cardano-foundation/CIPs#769 (comment))
#772 - CIP-0072: Suggestions for improving dApp registration identity verification
- Tagging authors & agreeing could implement CIP scope (cardano-foundation/CIPs#772 (comment))
- ... however, noting that CIP meeting consensus indicated this would be very difficult to establish what is meant by "trust" here (cardano-foundation/CIPs#772 (comment))
#83 - Tuesday 05 March 2024 (4PM UTC) - https://hackmd.io/@cip-editors/83
- Good participation but only one new CIP candidate: but thanks to author we were also able to merge & therefore add Catalyst posted CBOR tag proposals between meetings (cardano-foundation/CIPs#775)
#84 - Tuesday 19 March 2024 (4PM UTC) - https://hackmd.io/@cip-editors/84
- adversised (on agenda) as PLUTUS SPECIAL: excellent participation, very helpful in narrowing focus among Plutus alternatives (to continue in future meetings).
- Assignement of new candidates & merging an enthusiastically received, well debated CPS (cardano-foundation/CIPs#789)