New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add FastQC-like "judgements" on the quality of the library #176

Open

rhpvorderman opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments

Owner

rhpvorderman commented Jun 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Hardest task is going to set the boundaries for "right", "dubious" and "wrong" . These differ for R9 and R10 chemistry, Illumina and Nanopore etc.

This feature was suggested at the Sequali presentation at BioSB 2024.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment