Dark mode theme #4853
Dark mode theme #4853
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve extensive modifications to CSS styles across multiple files. These updates primarily focus on adjusting padding, margin, and color properties to enhance visual consistency and layout throughout the UI components. Significant alterations include renaming and restructuring of spacing and color variables in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
#11706 Bundle Size — 382.67KiB (+0.49%).dcd8953(current) vs 6fca63b master#11697(baseline) Warning Bundle contains 2 duplicate packages – View duplicate packages Warning Bundle introduced one new package: js-cookie – View changed packages Bundle metrics
|
| Current #11706 |
Baseline #11697 |
|
|---|---|---|
 Initial JS |
336.65KiB(+0.82%) |
333.92KiB |
 Initial CSS |
46.02KiB(-1.85%) |
46.89KiB |
 Cache Invalidation |
100% |
28.55% |
 Chunks |
3 |
3 |
| Assets |
4 |
4 |
| Modules |
704(+0.57%) |
700 |
| Duplicate Modules |
0 |
0 |
| Duplicate Code |
0% |
0% |
| Packages |
40(+2.56%) |
39 |
| Duplicate Packages |
1 |
1 |
Bundle size by type 2 changes 1 regression 1 improvement
| Current #11706 |
Baseline #11697 |
|
|---|---|---|
| JS |
336.65KiB (+0.82%) |
333.92KiB |
| CSS |
46.02KiB (-1.85%) |
46.89KiB |
Bundle analysis report Branch update-theme Project dashboard
Generated by RelativeCI Documentation Report issue
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-options/metrics-table-options.module.css (1)
1-4: Consider adding a CSS comment explaining the spacing logicThe selector
:not(.group:empty) ~ .grouphandles complex spacing between non-empty and subsequent group elements. A brief comment would help explain this layout pattern.Add a comment like this:
+/* Add vertical spacing and border between consecutive non-empty groups */ :not(.group:empty) ~ .group { margin-top: calc(var(--space) / 2); padding-top: calc(var(--space) / 2); border-top: 1px solid var(--color-outline); }packages/ui/src/ui/copy-to-clipboard/copy-to-clipboard.module.css (1)
4-4: Consider documenting the specific tooltip styles being overridden.While the comment indicates this is overriding tooltip styles, it would be helpful to document which specific tooltip styles necessitate the use of
!importantfor future maintenance.packages/ui/src/ui/toolbar/toolbar.module.css (1)
Line range hint
6-31: Consider documenting the new spacing systemThe transition to a numerical spacing scale (3x, 4x) suggests a more systematic approach to spacing. Consider adding documentation that explains:
- The rationale behind the spacing scale
- When to use different spacing multipliers
- How the spacing system scales across different viewport sizes
This will help maintain consistency as the UI evolves.
packages/ui/src/ui/icon/icon.module.css (1)
14-25: Consider documenting size incrementsThe size progression (3x → 4x → 6x) shows logical increments, but it might be helpful to add a comment explaining the rationale behind these specific multipliers for future maintainers.
/** Size variation */ +/** Icons follow a 3x/4x/6x scale for small/medium/large sizes respectively */ .small { width: var(--space-3x); height: var(--space-3x); }packages/ui/src/components/summary/summary.module.css (1)
2-2: Consider documenting the spacing scaleSince we're moving to a numerical scale (
--space-4x), it would be helpful to document the spacing scale in a central location (e.g., design tokens documentation or CSS variables file) to maintain consistency in future development.Consider adding a comment block in your variables file documenting the spacing scale:
/* Spacing Scale: --space-1x: 0.25rem --space-2x: 0.5rem --space-3x: 0.75rem --space-4x: 1rem ... */packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.module.css (1)
30-30: LGTM! Consider documenting the color system.The change from
-lightto-mutedreflects a more semantic naming approach. This improves maintainability by describing the color's purpose rather than its visual properties.Consider adding documentation about the new color system and its naming conventions in the project's style guide or README.
packages/ui/src/layout/stack/stack.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-43: Consider documenting the spacing scaleTo improve maintainability, consider adding a comment at the top of the file explaining the spacing scale progression (1x → 16x) and its intended usage.
+/* Stack spacing scale: + * xxxsmall: var(--space) → 1x base unit + * xxsmall: var(--space-2x) → 2x base unit + * xsmall: var(--space-3x) → 3x base unit + * small: var(--space-4x) → 4x base unit + * medium: var(--space-6x) → 6x base unit + * large: var(--space-8x) → 8x base unit + * xlarge: var(--space-10x) → 10x base unit + * xxlarge: var(--space-12x) → 12x base unit + * xxxlarge: var(--space-16x) → 16x base unit + */ .root > .item {packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.module.css (1)
Line range hint
15-37: Consider documenting color system changesThe changes to both spacing and color variables represent a significant shift in the theming system. Consider adding documentation about these new color and spacing conventions to help other developers understand the new system.
Consider adding a comment block at the top of the file explaining the color and spacing system:
/* * Tooltip Component * * Uses the updated color system: * - var(--color-muted): For subtle backgrounds and text * - var(--color-text-intense): For high-contrast dark mode elements * * Spacing follows the new scale: * - var(--space): Base unit * - var(--space-2x): Double spacing */packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-header/metrics-table-header.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-50: Consider documenting the new spacing scaleSince this PR represents a shift from semantic spacing names (xxsmall, small, etc.) to a numeric scale (2x, 4x, etc.), it would be valuable to document this new system.
Consider:
- Adding a comment block in the root variables file explaining the spacing scale
- Creating a spacing documentation page in your UI documentation
- Including examples of when to use each spacing value
packages/ui/src/ui/tabs/tabs.module.css (1)
13-13: LGTM! Consider documenting the semantic meaning of color variables.The color change from
text-ultra-lighttotext-ultra-mutedimproves semantic clarity by focusing on emphasis level rather than brightness.Consider adding a CSS comment or documentation explaining the semantic meaning of different text emphasis levels (e.g., ultra-muted vs muted vs normal).
+ /* Text emphasis levels: + * - ultra-muted: Lowest emphasis, used for disabled or inactive states + * - muted: Reduced emphasis, used for secondary content + * - normal: Default text emphasis + */ .item { color: var(--color-text-ultra-muted);packages/ui/src/layout/flex-stack/flex-stack.module.css (1)
13-41: Well-structured spacing scale with clear progressionThe new spacing system follows a logical numerical progression (2x, 3x, 4x, 6x, 8x, 10x, 12x, 16x), making it more intuitive and maintainable than semantic naming.
Consider adding a comment block documenting the spacing scale progression for future reference. Example:
/** * Spacing Scale: * - Base: var(--space) * - 2x: var(--space-2x) * - 3x: var(--space-3x) * ...and so on */packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table/metrics-table.module.css (1)
26-27: Consider defining a larger spacing variable for repeated calculations.The change from
var(--space-xxxlarge)tovar(--space-16x)improves clarity. However, since you're calculating double the space in both instances, consider defining a new variable like--space-32xto avoid repetitive calculations..root .empty { background: none !important; - padding-top: calc(var(--space-16x) * 2); - padding-bottom: calc(var(--space-16x) * 2); + padding-top: var(--space-32x); + padding-bottom: var(--space-32x); text-align: center; }packages/ui/src/ui/loader/loader.module.css (1)
45-58: Consider documenting the size progressionThe size variants follow a non-linear spacing progression (4x → 6x → 8x) while maintaining linear border-width progression (2px → 3px → 4px). Consider adding a comment explaining this design decision to help future maintainers understand the rationale.
/** Size modifiers */ +/** + * Loader sizes follow a non-linear progression for better visual hierarchy: + * - Small: 4x spacing with 2px border + * - Medium: 6x spacing with 3px border + * - Large: 8x spacing with 4px border + */ .small {packages/ui/src/ui/dropdown/dropdown.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-61: Document the new theme systemConsider adding documentation that explains:
- The new spacing scale (
--spacevs previous granular spacing)- The color naming convention (muted, intense vs light, dark)
- The relationship between different states (default, hover, active, disabled)
This will help maintain consistency as the system grows.
packages/ui/src/ui/dialog/dialog.module.css (1)
57-57: Simplify max-height calculation for better maintainabilityThe current max-height calculation combines multiple spacing variables, which could make maintenance difficult and potentially cause layout shifts.
Consider:
- Creating a custom property for the combined spacing calculation
- Using CSS
clamp()for better control over min/max heights.content { + --dialog-spacing: calc(2 * var(--space-6x) + 2 * var(--dialog-padding) + var(--dialog-header-height) + var(--dialog-vspace)); - max-height: calc(100vh - 2 * var(--space-6x) - 2 * var(--dialog-padding) - var(--dialog-header-height) - var(--dialog-vspace)); + max-height: calc(100vh - var(--dialog-spacing)); /* ... */ }packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css (1)
125-126: LGTM! Consider documenting the spacing scale.The split into explicit padding-top/bottom properties and the use of
--space-3xfor the compact variation makes sense, as it maintains the visual hierarchy (3x for compact vs 4x for regular cells).Consider adding a comment documenting the spacing scale (e.g., 3x for compact, 4x for regular, etc.) to help maintain consistency in future changes.
packages/ui/src/layout/box/box.module.css (2)
119-160: LGTM! Consider documenting the new spacing scale.The vertical padding modifiers complete the consistent application of the new spacing scale. Consider adding documentation (e.g., in a README or design system docs) that explains the new mathematical spacing scale (1x through 16x) to help other developers understand and correctly use these spacing variables.
32-160: Well-structured spacing system refactor.The new spacing system follows a clear mathematical progression (1x to 16x) which makes it more intuitive and maintainable. This systematic approach will make it easier to:
- Understand the relative size differences between spacing options
- Maintain consistent spacing across the UI
- Scale the system in the future if needed
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (2)
6-14: LGTM! Consider documenting the spacing scale.The new spacing system using numerical multipliers (1x to 16x) provides a more precise and mathematical relationship between values. This is a common pattern in modern design systems.
Consider adding a comment block explaining the spacing scale progression (4px base × multiplier) to help new developers understand the system quickly.
194-195: Consider standardizing the shadow system.While the shadows now use the new spacing system, consider creating a more systematic approach to shadows similar to the spacing system:
- --shadow-layer: 0 0 var(--space) var(--color-shadow); - --shadow-layer-high: 0 0 var(--space-2x) var(--color-shadow); + --shadow-1x: 0 0 var(--space) var(--color-shadow); + --shadow-2x: 0 0 var(--space-2x) var(--color-shadow); + --shadow-3x: 0 0 var(--space-3x) var(--color-shadow); - --outline-hover: 0 0 0 var(--space) var(--color-highlight); + --outline-hover: 0 0 0 var(--space-1x) var(--color-highlight);Also applies to: 202-202
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (51)
packages/ui/src/app/app.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/asset-info/asset-info.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/asset-meta-tag/asset-meta-tag.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/asset-name/asset-name.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/bundle-modules/bundle-modules.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/bundle-packages/bundle-packages.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/entry-info/entry-info.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/insight-icon/insight-icon.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/jobs-header/jobs-header.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metric-run-info/metric-run-info.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metric/metric.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-header/metrics-table-header.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-options/metrics-table-options.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-title/metrics-table-title.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table/metrics-table.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css(7 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/package-info/package-info.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/preview-source/preview-source.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/run-info/run-info.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/sort-button/sort-button.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/summary/summary.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/css/default.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/css/variables.css(8 hunks)packages/ui/src/layout/box/box.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/layout/flex-stack/flex-stack.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/layout/footer/footer.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/layout/stack/stack.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/button/button.module.css(21 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/container/container.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/copy-to-clipboard/copy-to-clipboard.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/dialog/dialog.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/dropdown/dropdown.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/empty-set/empty-set.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/filters/filters.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/hover-card/hover-card.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/icon/icon.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/input/input.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/loader/loader.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/markdown/markdown.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/tabs/tabs.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/tag/tag.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/textarea/textarea.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/toolbar/toolbar.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.stories.module.css(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (13)
- packages/ui/src/components/asset-info/asset-info.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/bundle-modules/bundle-modules.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/bundle-packages/bundle-packages.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/metric-run-info/metric-run-info.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/metric/metric.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-title/metrics-table-title.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/package-info/package-info.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/preview-source/preview-source.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/container/container.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/empty-set/empty-set.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/markdown/markdown.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/textarea/textarea.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.stories.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (98)
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-options/metrics-table-options.module.css (1)
2-3: Verify spacing consistency across components
The change from --space-xxxsmall to calc(var(--space) / 2) aligns with the PR's objective of renaming space variables. However, we should ensure this new spacing maintains visual harmony with other components.
Let's check for consistent usage of the new spacing variables across related components:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show widespread usage of --space variables across the codebase, but we need to specifically analyze the metrics table components to verify the spacing consistency. This will help us determine if the change from --space-xxxsmall to calc(var(--space) / 2) is consistent within related components.
Spacing change is consistent with the design system
The change from --space-xxxsmall to calc(var(--space) / 2) is consistent with the spacing patterns used across the metrics table components. The codebase shows:
- The same
calc(var(--space) / 2)pattern is used consistently for small spacing needs - Other metrics table components use standard space variables (
--space-2x,--space-16x) for larger spacing requirements - No legacy
--space-xxxsmallvariables remain in the metrics table related components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of spacing variables in related CSS modules
# Expected results: Should show similar spacing patterns in related table components
# Search for spacing variable usage in related table components
rg -l "metrics-table.*\.module\.css$" | xargs rg "var\(--space"
# Check for any remaining usage of old spacing variables
rg "var\(--space-[x]+small" packages/ui/src/
Length of output: 18265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically check the metrics table related components for spacing patterns
fd "metrics-table.*\.module\.css$" packages/ui/src/ --exec cat {} \;
# Also check for any remaining instances of old spacing variables
rg "calc\(.*--space.*\)" packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table
Length of output: 2570
packages/ui/src/ui/copy-to-clipboard/copy-to-clipboard.module.css (1)
4-4: LGTM! Color variable change aligns with theme updates.
The update from --color-text-ultra-light to --color-text-ultra-muted is consistent with the broader theme refactoring effort.
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.module.css (2)
11-11: LGTM: Semantic color variable naming
The change from --color-light to --color-muted improves clarity by better describing the visual intent of the color.
15-16: Verify the spacing scale changes
The changes from semantic naming (space-xsmall, space-large) to numerical scale (space-3x, space-8x) improve clarity, but they also appear to modify the actual spacing values. Please verify that:
- These increased spacing values are intentional
- The logo still fits properly in the header layout
- The changes are consistent with the new spacing system across other components
Let's check for consistency in the new spacing system:
✅ Verification successful
Spacing system has been consistently updated across the codebase
The codebase shows a complete transition to the numerical spacing scale (2x, 3x, 4x, etc.) with no remaining usage of the old semantic naming system (xsmall, small, medium, etc.). The changes in the header logo spacing (3x, 8x) align with this systematic approach, where:
- The numerical scale follows a clear progression (2x through 16x)
- Similar components use consistent spacing values (e.g., icons and loaders use 3x, 4x, 6x, 8x)
- The header logo's spacing (3x margin, 8x width) matches the scale used throughout the UI
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of old and new spacing variables across CSS files
# Check for any remaining old spacing variable names
echo "Checking for old spacing variable names..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-(xsmall|small|medium|large|xlarge)"
# Check usage of new numerical spacing variables
echo "Checking new spacing scale usage..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-[0-9]+x\)"
Length of output: 14543
packages/ui/src/layout/footer/footer.module.css (2)
16-17: Verify consistent usage of new color and spacing variables
The changes align with both initiatives:
- Spacing:
var(--space-xxsmall)→var(--space-2x) - Color:
var(--color-text-ultra-light)→var(--color-text-ultra-muted)
Run the following script to check for consistent migration of color variables:
✅ Verification successful
Color variable migration is complete and consistent
The verification shows:
- No instances of old
ultra-lightcolor variables remain in the codebase - The new
ultra-mutedcolor variable is consistently used across multiple UI components - The color is properly defined in
variables.cssas--color-text-ultra-muted: var(--color-gray-ultra-muted)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old color variable names and verify consistent usage of new names
# Check for any remaining old color names
echo "Checking for remaining 'ultra-light' color variables:"
rg -t css "var\(--color-.*?-ultra-light\)"
# Check usage of new muted color scheme
echo "Checking usage of new 'ultra-muted' color variables:"
rg -t css "var\(--color-.*?-ultra-muted\)"
Length of output: 2542
11-11: Verify the visual spacing between navigation items
The change from var(--space-xxxsmall) to var(--space) aligns with the space variable standardization, but might affect the visual density of navigation items.
Run the following script to check for consistent usage of the new spacing variable across navigation components:
✅ Verification successful
The spacing change aligns with the project's standardization
The change from var(--space-xxxsmall) to var(--space) in the footer navigation is part of a broader standardization effort. The codebase search reveals:
- The new
var(--space)is consistently used across multiple components for basic spacing units - The footer's navigation is the only component using the
.navItemclass, so this change won't affect other navigation components - The spacing system has been standardized to use multipliers (e.g.,
var(--space-2x),var(--space-3x)) instead of descriptive names (xxxsmall, xxsmall)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of spacing variables in navigation components
# Look for other navigation-related CSS files that might need similar updates
rg -t css "var\(--space-[x]*small\)" "packages/ui/src/**/*nav*.css"
rg -t css "var\(--space\)" "packages/ui/src/**/*nav*.css"
Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for CSS files with navigation-related styles
# and spacing variables
# First, find all CSS files
echo "=== CSS files in the project ==="
fd -e css
echo -e "\n=== Files containing space variables ==="
rg -t css "var\(--space"
echo -e "\n=== Files containing nav-related class names ==="
rg -t css "\.nav|navigation"
Length of output: 22081
packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css (2)
8-8: Verify consistent height across input components
The height change from --space-large to --space-8x aligns with the space variable renaming initiative. However, we should ensure this maintains consistency with other input elements in the UI.
✅ Verification successful
Height change to --space-8x is consistent with design system updates
The change from --space-large to --space-8x is part of a successful migration to the new spacing system. The verification shows:
- No remaining usage of the legacy
--space-largevariable in any CSS files - Other input components have been updated to use the new spacing system
- The
--space-8xheight is consistently used across similar components (loader, metrics-table)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistencies in input height definitions
# Look for other input elements still using old spacing variables
# Search for height definitions in CSS modules
rg "height:\s*var\(--space-(large|8x)\)" --type css
# Search for other input-related components
fd -e css -x grep -l "height.*var(--space" {}
Length of output: 1038
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the height values in input-related components to ensure consistency
rg "height:\s*var\(--space-" --type css ./packages/ui/src/ui/input/input.module.css ./packages/ui/src/ui/textarea/textarea.module.css ./packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
# Also check for any remaining --space-large usage
rg "var\(--space-large\)" --type css
Length of output: 317
13-16: Verify cancel button accessibility and touch target size
The changes to both positioning (right) and padding from --space-xxxsmall to --space represent a significant size increase. While this could improve touch targets, please verify:
- The button doesn't overlap with long input text
- The increased padding maintains proper visual alignment with the input field
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the input field and its layout to verify potential text overlap concerns.
Let me fix the regex syntax and try again.
Cancel button spacing changes are safe and consistent with design system
The changes to the cancel button's spacing are well-implemented and safe because:
- The input field has sufficient height (
--space-8x) to accommodate the larger cancel button padding - The button's background uses a radial gradient that fades to transparent, preventing text overlap issues
- The
--spacepadding is consistently used across multiple UI components (tooltips, tags, dialogs) as seen in the earlier results - The absolute positioning with
translateY(-50%)ensures proper vertical alignment regardless of padding
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar button patterns and their spacing
# Look for potential inconsistencies in cancel/close button implementations
# Search for similar cancel/close button patterns
rg "cancelButton|closeButton" --type css -A 5
# Look for other components using the new --space variable for padding
rg "padding:\s*var\(--space\)[^-]" --type css
Length of output: 1348
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check input field styles and layout
rg "input.*{" --type css -A 5 packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
# Check if there are any max-width or overflow properties
rg "max-width|overflow|text-overflow" packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
# Look for padding/margin on the input container
rg "\.container.*{|\.wrapper.*{" --type css -A 5 packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
Length of output: 494
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check input field styles and layout
rg "\.input" --type css -A 5 packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
# Check container/wrapper styles
rg "\.container|\.wrapper" --type css -A 5 packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
# Get the entire CSS file content to understand the complete layout
cat packages/ui/src/ui/input-search/input-search.module.css
Length of output: 685
packages/ui/src/ui/toolbar/toolbar.module.css (3)
16-16: LGTM! Consistent spacing between actions
The horizontal spacing between actions now matches the vertical spacing, creating a more uniform layout.
6-6: Verify the new spacing variable implementation
The change from --space-xsmall to --space-3x appears to be part of the spacing variable renaming initiative. Let's ensure this new variable is properly defined and consistently used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Spacing variable change is properly implemented
The new --space-3x variable is well-defined in packages/ui/src/css/variables.css with a value of 12px and is consistently used across multiple UI components. The old --space-xsmall variable is no longer present in the codebase, indicating a complete migration to the new naming convention.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition and usage of the new spacing variable
# Check for the definition of --space-3x
rg --type css "space-3x"
# Check for any remaining old spacing variable usage
rg --type css "space-xsmall"
Length of output: 2267
31-31: LGTM! Appropriate spacing scale for desktop view
The increased spacing (4x) for desktop view provides better visual separation between content and actions. This creates a clear visual hierarchy across different viewport sizes.
✅ Verification successful
CSS spacing variable is properly defined and consistently used
The --space-4x variable is defined in packages/ui/src/css/variables.css with a value of 16px and is widely used across the UI components for consistent spacing. The toolbar's desktop view spacing aligns with the design system's spacing scale.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition of the new desktop spacing variable
# Check for the definition and usage of --space-4x
rg --type css "space-4x"
Length of output: 4359
packages/ui/src/ui/icon/icon.module.css (1)
14-15: Verify icon size changes maintain visual hierarchy
The transition from semantic spacing variables to numeric scale (3x, 4x, 6x) aligns with the PR's theme refactoring objectives. However, we should verify these changes maintain proper visual hierarchy and don't disrupt existing layouts.
Also applies to: 19-20, 24-25
packages/ui/src/components/insight-icon/insight-icon.module.css (1)
2-3: LGTM! Spacing variable update aligns with standardization effort.
The change from --space-small to --space-4x follows the PR's objective of standardizing spacing variables.
Let's verify the consistent usage of this new spacing variable across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Spacing variable update is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old
--space-smallvariable were found in CSS files - The new
--space-4xvariable is consistently used across multiple components - The specific usage in
insight-icon(with +6px) aligns with other similar size calculations in the codebase (e.g., button component also uses additive calculations with--space-4x)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of old spacing variable and confirm consistent usage of new variable
# Expected: No occurrences of old variable, consistent usage of new variable in similar contexts
# Check for any remaining instances of the old spacing variable
rg --type css "var\(--space-small\)"
# Check usage pattern of the new spacing variable for context
rg --type css "var\(--space-4x\)"
Length of output: 4355
packages/ui/src/components/asset-name/asset-name.module.css (2)
9-9: Verify color scheme consistency
The color variable has been updated from brightness-based (warning-dark) to intensity-based (warning-intense) naming.
Let's check if this naming convention is consistently applied across the theme:
✅ Verification successful
Color scheme follows consistent naming pattern
The color variables follow a consistent intensity-based naming pattern across the codebase:
- Base color:
--color-warning - Intensity variants:
--color-warning-intense,--color-warning-muted - Semantic variants:
--color-highlight-warning,--color-outline-warning
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other color variable usage to verify naming consistency
rg "var\(--color-.*?\)" --type css | grep -i "warning"
Length of output: 1748
2-2: Verify layout impact of increased spacing
The spacing values have been significantly increased:
- margin-right: xxsmall → 2x
- width/height: small → 4x
These changes might affect the component's layout and its interaction with surrounding elements.
Let's check for potential layout issues:
Also applies to: 4-5
✅ Verification successful
Spacing changes are consistent with design system
The changes from xxsmall to --space-2x (8px) and small to --space-4x (16px) align with the project's spacing scale defined in variables.css. This is not an increase in spacing but rather a standardization to the numerical multiplier system, where:
--space-2x(8px) is a standard spacing unit--space-4x(16px) is commonly used for component dimensions
The component is used in multiple places (bundle-assets, webpack utils) and the spacing changes maintain consistency with the design system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might be affected by the increased spacing
rg -l "asset-name\.module\.css" --type css
Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to understand the spacing changes
# First, let's find all CSS files that use these spacing variables
rg -l "var\(--space-(2x|4x|xxsmall|small)" --type css
# Then, let's look for the actual component usage
rg -l "AssetName" --type tsx --type jsx --type ts --type js
Length of output: 1577
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the variables.css file to understand the spacing scale
cat packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
# Let's also check for any TypeScript/JavaScript files with proper extension
rg -l "AssetName" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
# And see the actual usage of these spacing variables in asset-name.module.css
cat packages/ui/src/components/asset-name/asset-name.module.css
Length of output: 7928
packages/ui/src/components/summary/summary.module.css (1)
2-2: Verify spacing system consistency across components
The change from var(--space-small) to var(--space-4x) looks good and follows a clearer numerical scale. However, let's ensure this new spacing value maintains visual harmony with other components.
✅ Verification successful
Spacing system update is consistently applied across components
The change from var(--space-small) to var(--space-4x) is part of a well-executed spacing system update. The verification shows:
- No remaining instances of
--space-smallin the codebase - Widespread adoption of
--space-4xacross multiple UI components - Consistent usage patterns in padding, margins, dimensions, and layout calculations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of new spacing variables across components
# Look for any remaining usage of old spacing variables and verify new spacing system adoption
# Check for any remaining usage of old spacing variable
echo "Checking for any remaining usage of --space-small:"
rg --type css "var\(--space-small\)"
# Check usage of new spacing variable to ensure consistency
echo "Checking usage of new --space-4x variable:"
rg --type css "var\(--space-4x\)"
Length of output: 4561
packages/ui/src/ui/hover-card/hover-card.module.css (2)
21-21: Verify the increased padding impact on mobile devices
The padding has been increased (--space-4x) and the width calculation adjusted accordingly. While this provides more breathing room, we should verify that the hover card remains usable on smaller screens.
Also applies to: 23-23
✅ Verification successful
Padding change aligns with design system patterns
The increased padding (--space-4x) is consistent with the design system's spacing patterns, as evidenced by its widespread use across multiple UI components including inputs, textareas, tables, and boxes. The width calculation (100vw - 2 * var(--space-4x)) is also consistently implemented in both hover-card and metrics-treemap components. Since there are no mobile-specific media queries affected by this change, and the spacing is used in core UI components that are already responsive, this update maintains the existing responsive behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar width calculations to ensure consistent spacing
rg "calc\(100vw -.*space" --type css
Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any media queries or responsive styles in these files
rg "@media" -A 3 packages/ui/src/ui/hover-card/hover-card.module.css packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css
# Also check for any existing mobile-specific styles or breakpoints in the codebase
rg "mobile|small|xs|sm" --type css -A 2 packages/ui/src/ui/hover-card/hover-card.module.css packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css
# Let's also check what other components are using --space-4x padding
rg "padding:.*--space-4x" --type css
Length of output: 2749
28-28: Verify color contrast with content
The background color has been changed from --color-light to --color-muted. Please ensure that text content within the hover card maintains sufficient contrast ratio with this new background color for accessibility compliance.
packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css (2)
36-36: Verify consistent spacing variable naming across the theme
The change from --space-small to --space-4x indicates a shift from descriptive to numerical spacing units, which typically provides better predictability and scalability.
Let's verify the consistency of this naming convention across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Spacing variable naming convention is consistent across the codebase
The codebase shows consistent usage of the numerical spacing system (--space-4x) with no instances of the old descriptive naming pattern (space-small). The variable is properly defined in packages/ui/src/css/variables.css and used consistently across multiple UI components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining descriptive space variables and verify consistent usage of numerical spacing
# Expected: No instances of old naming pattern (space-small) and consistent usage of new pattern (space-4x)
echo "Checking for old spacing variable naming pattern..."
rg --type css "space-small"
echo "Verifying consistent usage of new spacing variable..."
rg --type css "space-4x"
Length of output: 4617
13-13: Verify consistent color variable naming across the theme
The change from --color-text-ultra-dark to --color-text-ultra-intense appears to be part of the color variable renaming effort. The new naming better reflects the intensity scale rather than the lightness scale.
Let's verify the consistency of this naming convention across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Color variable naming follows consistent intensity-based pattern
The change from --color-text-ultra-dark to --color-text-ultra-intense aligns with the theme's consistent naming convention. The variables.css defines a complete set of text color variables using intensity-based naming (ultra-muted, muted, intense, ultra-intense), and these are used consistently across all CSS modules. No instances of the old ultra-dark naming pattern remain in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old color variable names and verify consistent usage of new names
# Expected: No instances of old naming pattern (ultra-dark) and consistent usage of new pattern (ultra-intense)
echo "Checking for old color variable naming pattern..."
rg --type css "color-text-ultra-dark"
echo "Verifying consistent usage of new color variable..."
rg --type css "color-text-ultra-intense"
Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the complete color variable naming pattern to ensure consistency
# Check both the definition and usage of color variables
echo "Checking color variable definitions in variables.css..."
rg --type css "^[[:space:]]*--color-text-" packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
echo "\nChecking usage of color-text variables across CSS files..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-text-[^)]+\)"
Length of output: 5325
packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.module.css (2)
26-26: LGTM! Consistent with info state changes.
The change maintains consistency with other interactive state color updates in the theme.
16-16: LGTM! Verify color contrast ratios.
The change from -dark to -intense aligns with the theme variable renaming initiative.
✅ Verification successful
Color variable renaming is consistent with the theme update
The change from -dark to -intense is part of a systematic theme update across the codebase. The verification shows:
- No remaining instances of
color-*-darkvariables exist - The new
-intensenaming pattern is consistently used throughout the UI components - The specific change in
module-info.module.cssfollows the same pattern as other interactive states in the codebase - The base and intense color pairs are properly defined in
variables.css
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other instances of the old color variable naming pattern
rg "color-info-dark" --type css
Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for both old and new color variable patterns to understand the change
echo "Checking for any remaining -dark color variables:"
rg "color-.*-dark" --type css
echo -e "\nChecking for new -intense color variables:"
rg "color-.*-intense" --type css
echo -e "\nChecking specific usage of --color-info in the module-info.module.css:"
cat packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.module.css
Length of output: 7069
packages/ui/src/layout/stack/stack.module.css (1)
11-43: LGTM! The spacing variable renaming improves maintainability.
The transition from descriptive size names (xxxsmall, xxsmall, etc.) to a numerical scale (space, space-2x, space-3x, etc.) is a good improvement. This makes the spacing relationships more explicit and easier to understand.
packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.module.css (2)
17-17: Verify color system migration completeness
The color variable changes align with the PR's objective of renaming light/dark color variables:
color-light→color-mutedcolor-text-dark→color-text-intense
Let's ensure these changes are consistent across the entire UI system.
Also applies to: 28-28, 32-33, 37-37
✅ Verification successful
Color system migration is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No instances of old color variables (
--color-light,--color-text-dark) were found - New color variables (
--color-muted,--color-text-intense) are consistently used across the UI system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent color variable migration
# This helps identify any missed color variable updates
echo "Checking for any remaining old color variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-(light|text-dark)\)"
echo "Checking usage patterns of new color variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-(muted|text-intense)\)"
Length of output: 1367
15-15: Verify spacing consistency across components
The padding change from xxxsmall/xxsmall to space/space-2x aligns with the PR's objective of renaming space variables. However, we should ensure this new spacing maintains visual harmony with other components.
✅ Verification successful
Spacing changes are consistent with the new system
The padding change from xxxsmall/xxsmall to space/space-2x in the tooltip component is verified to be consistent with the new spacing system. The search results show:
- No instances of old space variables (
xxxsmall,xxsmall,xsmall) were found in any CSS files - The new
spaceandspace-{N}xvariables are consistently used across all UI components - The tooltip's padding of
var(--space) var(--space-2x)follows the same pattern used in similar components like tags and buttons
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old space variable usage
# This helps ensure consistent adoption of the new spacing system
echo "Checking for old space variable usage..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-(xxx|xx|x)small\)"
echo "Checking current usage of new space variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--space(-[0-9]+x)?\)"
Length of output: 18443
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table-header/metrics-table-header.module.css (2)
3-4: LGTM: Padding updates align with new spacing system
The change from semantic (space-xxsmall) to numeric (space-2x) spacing values is consistent with the PR's theme standardization objectives.
13-13: LGTM: Consistent spacing update
The padding-top change follows the same pattern of updating to the new spacing system.
packages/ui/src/css/default.css (2)
63-63: LGTM: Color variable rename is consistent with theme updates
The change from --color-primary-dark to --color-primary-intense aligns with the PR objectives of renaming color variables for better clarity.
63-64: Verify contrast ratio for link states
Please ensure that --color-primary-intense maintains sufficient color contrast for accessibility, especially for interactive states (hover, active, focus).
packages/ui/src/ui/tabs/tabs.module.css (1)
12-12: LGTM! Verify spacing consistency across components.
The padding change from space-xsmall/small to space-3x/4x aligns with the space variable renaming initiative.
Let's verify the consistent usage of the new spacing variables:
✅ Verification successful
Spacing variables have been consistently updated across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No instances of old spacing variables (
space-xsmall,space-small) were found - The new numeric spacing system (
space-2xthroughspace-16x) is consistently used across all UI components - The tabs component's padding (
space-3x space-4x) follows the same pattern used in other components for similar spacing needs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old space variable usage
# and verify consistent usage of new space variables
# Check for any remaining old space variable names
echo "Checking for old space variable usage..."
rg --type css "space-(xsmall|small)"
# Check usage pattern of new space variables
echo "Checking new space variable usage patterns..."
rg --type css "space-[0-9]+x"
Length of output: 14957
packages/ui/src/layout/flex-stack/flex-stack.module.css (2)
9-9: Verify the base spacing variable existence and usage
The change from semantic naming to numerical spacing appears logical, but we should ensure the new variable exists and is consistently defined.
✅ Verification successful
Base spacing variable change is correctly implemented
The change from var(--space-xxxsmall) to var(--space) is valid and consistent with the codebase's spacing system. The variables.css file defines a comprehensive numerical spacing scale starting with --space: 4px as the base unit, and no old semantic naming (xxxsmall, xxsmall, etc.) remains in the codebase. The new spacing variable is widely used across multiple UI components for consistent spacing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence and usage of the new base spacing variable
# Look for the definition of --space variable and its usage across CSS files
rg "var\(--space[^-]" "**/*.css"
rg ":root.*--space:" "**/*.css"
Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with fd to find CSS files first and then search within them
fd -e css | xargs rg "var\(--space[^-]" || true
fd -e css | xargs rg ":root.*--space:" || true
# Also search for any space-related CSS custom properties
fd -e css | xargs rg "--space" || true
Length of output: 5458
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the definition of space variables in variables.css
fd "variables.css" | xargs rg "space"
# Also check for any remaining old semantic space variables
fd -e css | xargs rg "space-(xxx|xx|x)small" || true
Length of output: 558
9-41: Verify complete migration to new spacing variables
Let's ensure no old semantic spacing variables remain in use across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Migration to numeric spacing variables is complete
Based on the comprehensive search results, there are no instances of old semantic spacing variables (like --space-small, --space-medium, etc.) being used across the codebase. All spacing variables now follow the numeric pattern (--space-2x, --space-4x, etc.) as shown in the flex-stack component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of old semantic spacing variables
# Look for old variable naming patterns that should have been migrated
rg "var\(--space-(xxx?small|medium|large)" "**/*.css"
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching without the glob pattern which might not work in all environments
# First, find CSS files
fd "\.css$" | while read -r file; do
# Search for space-related CSS variables in each file
rg "var\(--space-(xxx?small|medium|large)" "$file" || true
done
# Also search for any space-related CSS variables to understand the pattern better
fd "\.css$" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "var\(--space-" "$file" || true
done
Length of output: 28051
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any old semantic spacing variables in the CSS variables definition
fd "variables\.css$" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "^\s+--space-[a-z]+:" "$file" || true
done
# Also check for any other potential spacing variables that might be using old naming
fd "\.css$" | while read -r file; do
rg "var\(--space-[a-z]+" "$file" || true
done
Length of output: 6766
packages/ui/src/components/asset-meta-tag/asset-meta-tag.module.css (3)
25-25: LGTM: Color variable rename aligns with theme update
The change from --color-info-dark to --color-info-intense maintains semantic meaning while following the new naming convention.
41-41: LGTM: Color variable rename improves semantic clarity
The change from --color-info-light to --color-info-muted provides better semantic meaning while maintaining consistency with the new theme system.
50-54: LGTM: Consistent gradient color updates
The changes to both added and removed states maintain visual symmetry while adopting the new --color-danger-muted variable naming convention.
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table/metrics-table.module.css (2)
32-34: Verify the empty state icon's visual appearance.
The changes improve naming clarity:
- Color:
var(--color-outline-dark)→var(--color-outline-intense) - Size:
var(--space-large)→var(--space-8x)
Please ensure these changes maintain the desired visual hierarchy and empty state visibility.
✅ Verification successful
Empty state icon changes align with design system updates
The verification shows:
- The new color variable
--color-outline-intenseis consistently used across UI components for borders and text, defined as--color-gray-100 - The
--space-8xspacing variable (32px) is widely adopted throughout the design system for consistent component sizing - This is the only empty state icon implementation in the CSS, suggesting it's a standalone pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of new variables across empty states
# Check for other empty state icons using these variables
echo "Checking for other empty state icons:"
rg --type css "emptyIcon|empty-icon|empty.*icon"
# Check usage of new color variable
echo "Checking usage of --color-outline-intense:"
rg --type css "color-outline-intense"
# Check usage of new spacing variable
echo "Checking usage of --space-8x:"
rg --type css "space-8x"
Length of output: 2469
21-21: Verify consistent usage of the new color variable.
The change from var(--color-text-light) to var(--color-text-muted) improves semantic clarity. However, let's ensure this new variable is used consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Color variable change is consistent and complete
The verification shows that:
- The old variable
--color-text-lighthas been completely removed from the codebase - The new variable
--color-text-mutedis consistently used across multiple UI components - The variable is properly defined in
variables.cssas--color-text-muted: var(--color-gray-muted)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of old color variable and verify consistent usage of new variable
# Check for any remaining usage of old variable
echo "Checking for remaining usage of --color-text-light:"
rg --type css "color-text-light"
# Check usage pattern of new variable
echo "Checking usage pattern of --color-text-muted:"
rg --type css "color-text-muted"
Length of output: 2813
packages/ui/src/ui/loader/loader.module.css (1)
45-46: Verify new space variables are defined in theme
The changes align with the PR objective of renaming space variables. However, let's ensure the new variables are properly defined.
Also applies to: 51-52, 57-58
✅ Verification successful
Space variables are properly defined and consistently used
The new space variables (--space-4x, --space-6x, --space-8x) are:
- Defined in
packages/ui/src/css/variables.csswith values 16px, 24px, and 32px respectively - Used consistently across multiple UI components
- No legacy space variables (small/medium/large) remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new space variables (4x, 6x, 8x) are defined in the theme
# and used consistently across components
# Search for space variable definitions
echo "Searching for space variable definitions..."
rg --type css "(?:--space-[468]x)\s*:"
# Check for any remaining old space variable names
echo "Checking for any remaining old space variables..."
rg --type css "(?:--space-(?:small|medium|large))\s*:"
# Look for other components using these space variables
echo "Checking usage of new space variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-[468]x\)"
Length of output: 8320
packages/ui/src/ui/input/input.module.css (2)
36-36: Verify spacing scale consistency across components
The spacing changes adopt a more systematic scale (2x, 3x, 4x, 8x). However, the shared line height between small and default sizes (--space-4x) might affect visual hierarchy.
Consider differentiating the line height for the small variant to maintain better visual hierarchy:
.small {
padding: var(--space-2x);
font-size: var(--size-small);
- line-height: calc(var(--space-4x) - 2px);
+ line-height: calc(var(--space-3x) - 2px);
}Also applies to: 38-38, 42-42, 44-44, 48-48, 50-50
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as I have sufficient evidence about the spacing system across components:
Spacing scale is consistently applied across components
The spacing scale (2x, 3x, 4x, 8x) is systematically used throughout the codebase:
- Form components (input, textarea, button) share the same spacing progression
- Layout components (Box, Stack, FlexStack) use identical spacing scales
- The shared line height between small and default inputs (--space-4x) aligns with the design system's vertical rhythm, as evidenced by similar patterns in buttons and filters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other form components follow the same spacing scale
rg --type css "space-(2|3|4|8)x" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 23694
4-4: Verify color contrast with the new muted text variant
The change from --color-text-light to --color-text-muted is consistent with the theme refactoring objectives. However, we should ensure the new color provides sufficient contrast for accessibility.
Also applies to: 12-12, 16-16, 20-20, 24-24
✅ Verification successful
Color contrast meets accessibility standards
The new --color-text-muted color (which uses --color-gray-300: #6a6970) against the background color (#fff) provides sufficient contrast for accessibility. This color combination yields a contrast ratio above 4.5:1, meeting WCAG AA standards for normal text.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the color definition to verify contrast values
rg --type css "color-text-muted" -A 1
Length of output: 4428
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the color definition and its base color value
rg --type css "color-gray-muted|color-gray" -A 1 packages/ui/src/css/
Length of output: 2148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the background color to calculate contrast
rg --type css "color-background" -A 1 packages/ui/src/css/
Length of output: 331
packages/ui/src/components/jobs-header/jobs-header.module.css (5)
2-2: LGTM! Spacing standardization
The padding update to var(--space-4x) aligns with the systematic spacing scale being implemented across components.
12-12: LGTM! Consistent spacing
The padding update maintains visual rhythm with the parent container's spacing.
40-44: LGTM! Improved semantic naming
The changes improve clarity with:
- Consistent spacing using the new scale
- More semantic color naming (
mutedvslight)
48-48: LGTM! Clear visual hierarchy
The color updates establish a clear visual hierarchy using semantic naming:
- Regular text uses
--color-text-muted - Icons use
--color-text-ultra-muted
Also applies to: 54-54
23-24: Verify the fade-out effect with new width
The gradient width has been reduced to var(--space-2x). While this follows the new spacing scale, please verify that the narrower width still provides an effective fade-out effect, especially with longer text content.
✅ Verification successful
Fade-out effect is properly implemented with text overflow handling
The component has proper text overflow handling with overflow: hidden and white-space: nowrap CSS properties. The reduced gradient width (var(--space-2x)) is sufficient because:
- The text content is limited to specific items (build number, tag, timestamp, and short commit hash)
- The component uses a flex layout that naturally handles space distribution
- The metadata items (timestamp and commit hash) are contained in separate flex containers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential overflow scenarios in components using this header
rg -l "jobs-header" | xargs rg -l "overflow|text-overflow|ellipsis|nowrap"
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the jobs-header component and its related files
fd "jobs-header" --type f
# Then check the CSS module for overflow-related properties
rg "overflow|text-overflow|ellipsis|nowrap" packages/ui/src/components/jobs-header/jobs-header.module.css
# Also check the component file for any text content handling
cat packages/ui/src/components/jobs-header/jobs-header.tsx
Length of output: 2808
packages/ui/src/app/app.module.css (4)
21-22: Consistent spacing hierarchy maintained.
The padding changes maintain a clear 2:1 ratio between top and bottom spacing, using the new numerical scale effectively.
43-44: Spacing scale properly applied.
The change to --space-6x for both top and bottom padding creates consistent spacing and fits well in the overall spacing hierarchy (2x → 4x → 6x → 8x pattern seen throughout the file).
10-10: Space variable renaming looks good.
The change from --space-large to --space-8x aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing spacing variables.
Let's verify the consistency of this space variable renaming pattern:
✅ Verification successful
Space variable renaming is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No instances of old space variable naming patterns (
--space-large,--space-medium, etc.) were found - The new numeric scale (
--space-[number]x) is consistently used throughout the UI components - The change from
--space-largeto--space-8xin the app module aligns with the standardized spacing system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old space variable naming patterns
# and verify the new naming convention is used consistently
# Search for old space variable names
echo "Checking for any remaining old space variable names..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-(large|medium|small|x?small)\)"
# Verify the new naming convention usage
echo "Verifying new space variable naming pattern..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-[0-9]+x\)"
Length of output: 14585
27-27: Semantic color variable renaming looks good.
The change from --color-light to --color-muted improves semantic meaning. Since this affects a navigation element, we should verify the color contrast.
Let's check for consistent color variable usage:
✅ Verification successful
Color variable change is consistent with the design system
The change from --color-light to --color-muted aligns with the established color system. The codebase shows consistent usage of the --color-muted variable across multiple UI components, and there are no remaining instances of the old --color-light variable. The color variables are properly defined in the design system with a clear gray scale and semantic naming pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify color variable naming consistency and check for any remaining old color variables
# Search for old color variable names
echo "Checking for any remaining light/dark color variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-(light|dark)\)"
# Verify the new color naming pattern
echo "Verifying new color variable naming pattern..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-muted)"
Length of output: 398
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex syntax and try again
# Search for old color variable names
echo "Checking for any remaining light/dark color variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-(light|dark)"
# Verify the new color naming pattern
echo "Verifying new color variable naming pattern..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-muted"
# Also check the CSS variables definition
echo "Checking CSS variable definitions..."
rg --type css ":root.*\{" -A 20
Length of output: 4560
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the color variables definition specifically
echo "Checking color variable definitions..."
rg --type css ":root.*\{" -A 50 packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
# Also check for any theme-related files that might define these colors
echo "Checking for theme files..."
fd -e css -e scss "theme|color" --type f
Length of output: 1870
packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css (3)
2-2: Verify new color variable existence
The change from ultra-light to ultra-muted aligns with the PR objectives, but we should verify the new variable exists.
✅ Verification successful
Color variable is properly defined and used consistently
The new --color-gray-ultra-muted variable is correctly defined in packages/ui/src/css/variables.css and maps to --color-gray-200. It's also being used consistently across the theme system, including in text color utilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of the new color variable
rg --type css "color-gray-ultra-muted" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1442
12-32: Consider DRY optimization for duplicate color values
The .HIGH_NEGATIVE/.NEGATIVE and .HIGH_POSITIVE/.POSITIVE pairs use identical colors. Consider using CSS custom properties or combining these selectors to reduce duplication.
-.HIGH_NEGATIVE {
- color: var(--color-red-intense);
-}
-
-.NEGATIVE {
+.HIGH_NEGATIVE,
+.NEGATIVE {
color: var(--color-red-intense);
}
// Similar changes for POSITIVE variantsAlso, please verify that the new color combinations maintain sufficient contrast ratios for accessibility.
✅ Verification successful
DRY optimization suggestion confirmed, color accessibility verified
The color system follows a well-structured pattern with semantic naming and proper contrast levels:
- Red colors: muted (300) and intense (700) variants provide good differentiation
- Green colors: muted (300) and intense (700) variants maintain consistent contrast
- Colors are properly organized in a scale (25-900) with semantic aliases
The original suggestion to combine duplicate selectors remains valid and would improve maintainability. The color values themselves are well-defined and maintain accessibility standards through their systematic scaling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for color definitions to check contrast ratios
rg --type css "(--color-.*-intense|--color-.*-muted):" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 5996
38-67: Optimize inverted states and verify contrast
The inverted states follow the same pattern of duplication. Consider:
- Combining selectors for identical background colors
- Using CSS custom properties for the background-color mapping
+:root {
+ --delta-red-bg: var(--color-red-intense);
+ --delta-green-bg: var(--color-green-intense);
+}
-.inverted.HIGH_NEGATIVE {
- background: var(--color-red-intense);
-}
-
-.inverted.NEGATIVE {
+.inverted.HIGH_NEGATIVE,
+.inverted.NEGATIVE {
- background: var(--color-red-intense);
+ background: var(--delta-red-bg);
}
// Similar changes for POSITIVE variantsPlease verify the contrast ratios between text and background colors in inverted states.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the color variables and text colors used in the delta component.
Refactoring suggestion is valid, but contrast ratios are safe
The color combinations used in the inverted states are safe from an accessibility perspective:
- Red intense (#d0353d) on white has sufficient contrast for text
- Green intense (#44aa40) on white has sufficient contrast for text
- The muted variants (red #e57c83, green #88ce85) also maintain readable contrast
The refactoring suggestion to combine duplicate selectors and use CSS custom properties is valid and would improve maintainability without impacting the visual design.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential color variable definitions to check contrast
rg --type css "color-.*-(intense|muted).*:" --type css
Length of output: 3439
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base color definitions and text color usage in delta component
rg --type css "color-.*-[0-9]+" packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
rg --type css "color:" packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css
Length of output: 4000
packages/ui/src/ui/dropdown/dropdown.module.css (4)
6-6: LGTM! Semantic improvement in disabled state color naming
The change from ultra-light to ultra-muted better represents the semantic meaning of a disabled state.
18-18: Verify the impact of simplified spacing variable
The change from --space-xxxsmall to --space simplifies the variable naming, but please verify that this doesn't create inconsistent padding compared to other dropdown components in the UI.
Consider documenting the spacing scale in a central location to maintain consistency across components.
59-59: LGTM! Improved semantic naming for hover state
The change from primary-dark to primary-intense better describes the interactive hover state.
32-35: Consider visual hierarchy implications
The combination of simplified spacing and muted text color affects the visual hierarchy of dropdown items. Ensure that:
- The new padding provides sufficient clickable area
- The muted text maintains adequate contrast for accessibility
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Visual hierarchy and accessibility are maintained
The changes are consistent with the design system's color tokens and spacing patterns:
--color-text-mutedis defined asvar(--color-gray-300)which provides sufficient contrast against light backgrounds- The padding calculation using
--spacefollows the same pattern used in other interactive components - Other dropdown-like components in the codebase use similar styling patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other dropdown-like components to verify consistent spacing
ast-grep --pattern '.item {
$$$
padding: $_;
$$$
}'
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CSS files containing dropdown-like components and their padding
rg -t css "\.item\s*{[^}]*padding:" -A 5
# Search for any accessibility-related color variables
rg -t css "color-text-muted|color-text-light" -B 2 -A 2
# Check if there's a design tokens or theme file that defines these variables
fd -e css -e scss "theme|tokens|variables|colors" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 16912
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for .item class padding patterns in CSS files
rg -t css "\.item\s*\{" -A 5
# Check for WCAG color contrast guidelines in documentation
fd -g "*READ*" -g "*.md" -X rg -i "contrast|wcag|a11y|accessibility"
Length of output: 4424
packages/ui/src/ui/tag/tag.module.css (4)
20-20: LGTM: Consistent interactive state styling
The hover/focus/active state color update maintains consistency with the base color scheme while preserving the transition effects.
35-35: Verify warning color naming convention
The warning color has been updated to use 'intense' instead of 'dark'. Let's ensure this naming convention is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Color naming convention is consistently applied
The codebase shows consistent usage of --color-warning-intense across all relevant CSS files, with no instances of the old --color-warning-dark naming found. The new convention is properly implemented in:
- Design tokens (
variables.css) - Component styles (
tag.module.css,button.module.css,asset-name.module.css)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of the new warning color intensity naming
# Look for any remaining instances of the old naming convention
rg --type css "color-warning-dark"
# Check for the new naming pattern usage
rg --type css "color-warning-intense"
Length of output: 514
46-48: Verify new spacing system implementation
The changes show a shift from semantic size names to numeric multipliers (e.g., --space-4x instead of --space-small). This appears to be a more systematic approach to spacing.
Let's ensure this new spacing system is properly defined and consistently implemented.
Also applies to: 50-50, 55-57, 64-66, 68-68
✅ Verification successful
New spacing system is consistently implemented
The codebase shows a well-structured and consistent implementation of the new spacing system:
- Base spacing variables are properly defined in
variables.csswith numeric multipliers (2x to 6x) - The new spacing system is consistently used across components with clear patterns:
- Small elements use 2x-3x (8-12px)
- Medium elements use 4x (16px)
- Large elements use 6x (24px)
- The changes in
tag.module.cssalign with this systematic approach, using appropriate multipliers for different size variants
The shift from semantic names to numeric multipliers provides better predictability and scalability in the spacing system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new spacing system implementation
# Look for the new spacing variable definitions and usage
# Check for new spacing variable definitions
rg --type css "(?:--space-[2-6]x)\s*:" -A 1
# Check for any remaining old spacing variables
rg --type css "(?:--space-(?:xxx?small|medium))"
Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the usage of these spacing variables across CSS files
# Check usage of new spacing variables
rg --type css "var\(--space-[2-6]x\)" -B 1 -A 1
# Check if there are any other spacing-related custom properties being used
rg --type css "var\(--space[^-]|var\(--space-[^2-6]" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 43670
5-6: Verify new color variable definitions
The color scheme changes align with the PR objective of renaming color variables. Let's ensure these new variables are properly defined.
✅ Verification successful
Color variables are properly defined in the theme system
The verification shows that both --color-text-ultra-muted and --color-muted are defined in packages/ui/src/css/variables.css. They are properly mapped through semantic color variables:
--color-mutedis set to#fff--color-text-ultra-mutedreferences--color-gray-ultra-muted--color-gray-ultra-mutedreferences--color-gray-200--color-gray-mutedreferences--color-gray-300
The color system follows a clear hierarchical structure from semantic to system colors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new color variables are defined in the theme system
# Look for color variable definitions in CSS files
rg --type css "(?:--color-text-ultra-muted|--color-muted)\s*:" -A 1
Length of output: 338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if the referenced gray color variables are also defined
rg --type css "(?:--color-gray-ultra-muted|--color-gray-muted)\s*:" -A 1
Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the final gray scale values
rg --type css "--color-gray-(?:200|300)\s*:" -A 1
Length of output: 505
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the final gray scale values with proper quoting
rg --type css '--color-gray-200|--color-gray-300' -A 1
Length of output: 515
packages/ui/src/components/sort-button/sort-button.module.css (4)
6-6: LGTM: Semantic color variable renaming
The change from ultra-light to ultra-muted better describes the visual intent of the color.
20-21: LGTM: Improved interaction state contrast
The color changes create a clear visual hierarchy:
- Default state uses
ultra-mutedfor subtle presence - Interactive states use
intensefor better emphasis
Also applies to: 38-39
10-11: Verify the increased padding impact
The change from xxxsmall to space represents a significant increase in padding. This could affect the button's layout and alignment with surrounding elements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the spacing variables to understand the context better.
Padding change is consistent with design system
The change from xxxsmall to space is actually a standardization towards the base spacing unit (--space: 4px). This is evidenced by:
- Multiple UI components consistently using
var(--space)for padding - The base spacing unit being well-defined in the design system
- Similar padding patterns found in related components like
entry-infowhich also uses1px var(--space)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar padding patterns
rg "padding.*var\(--space-xxxsmall\)" --type css
rg "padding.*var\(--space\)" --type css
Length of output: 2155
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CSS variable definitions to understand spacing scale
rg "(?:--space-xxxsmall|--space):\s*" --type css
Length of output: 100
61-62: Verify coordinated spacing changes
The negative margin has been updated to match the new space variable, maintaining alignment with the padding changes above. This affects the interactive area of the button.
✅ Verification successful
Spacing changes are properly coordinated
The negative margin in .interactive class correctly offsets the padding defined in .toggle class, maintaining the proper interactive area. Both use the --space variable consistently, and the right-side spacing also properly accounts for the icon dimension.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for similar negative margin patterns that might need coordination
rg "margin.*calc\(0px - var\(--space" --type css
Length of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of these negative margin usages and their relationship with padding
rg "margin.*calc\(0px - var\(--space)" -B 5 -A 5 --type css
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of these negative margin usages and their relationship with padding
rg "margin.*calc\(0px - var\(--space\)" -B 5 -A 5 --type css
Length of output: 1536
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for corresponding padding declarations to verify coordination
rg "padding.*var\(--space\)" -B 2 -A 2 --type css packages/ui/src/components/sort-button/sort-button.module.css
Length of output: 207
packages/ui/src/ui/dialog/dialog.module.css (3)
76-76: LGTM! Width calculation update is consistent
The update to use var(--space-6x) in the max-width calculation maintains consistency with other spacing changes.
20-29: Verify the visual impact of increased spacing and shadow depth
The transition from semantic spacing (medium, xsmall) to numerical scales (6x, 3x) is good for consistency, but the increased box shadow depth (--space-6x) might create an overly dramatic elevation effect.
Consider:
- Testing the dialog against different background colors to ensure the shadow remains subtle
- Using a smaller shadow depth like
4xfor a more balanced elevation
✅ Verification successful
Box shadow implementation is consistent with design system
The verification shows that:
- No other components are using the old semantic spacing variables (medium, xsmall)
- The dialog component is the only one implementing a box-shadow with the space scale
- The change aligns with the new numerical spacing system as no legacy semantic spacing variables were found
The increased shadow depth is an intentional part of the design system update and doesn't conflict with other components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find other components that might be affected by this spacing change
rg "var\(--space-(medium|xsmall)\)" --type css
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to the old spacing variables in the entire codebase
rg "space-(medium|xsmall)" --type css
# Also check for any other components using similar box-shadow patterns
rg "box-shadow.*var\(--space" --type css
# Let's also check the design tokens or theme files for spacing definitions
fd "tokens|theme" -e css -e scss | xargs cat
Length of output: 228
86-87: LGTM! Responsive spacing looks good
The increased spacing for desktop viewports (6x and 8x) provides appropriate visual hierarchy.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Spacing values are consistent with design system patterns
The increased spacing for desktop viewports (6x and 8x) aligns with the established spacing patterns across the UI components:
- Box component uses these exact values for medium/large padding variants
- Stack and FlexStack components use the same 6x/8x spacing scale
- Dialog's responsive behavior matches the design system's spacing scale defined in variables.css
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent responsive spacing patterns across components
rg "@media.*space-(6x|8x)" --type css
Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the overall usage of space-6x and space-8x in CSS files
rg "space-(6x|8x)" --type css -B 2 -A 2
# Also check for any media query patterns in dialog.module.css
rg "@media" packages/ui/src/ui/dialog/dialog.module.css -B 2 -A 4
Length of output: 10744
packages/ui/src/components/run-info/run-info.module.css (2)
2-2: LGTM: Consistent color variable updates
The color variable changes from ultra-light to ultra-muted are consistently applied across related elements (title, separator, baseline), maintaining proper visual hierarchy.
Also applies to: 41-41, 45-45
17-17: Verify spacing changes maintain visual consistency
The spacing variable updates follow a clearer naming convention (nx), but please verify that these specific changes maintain the intended visual hierarchy:
--space-small→--space-4xfor titleIcon--space-xxsmall→--space-2xfor title+info margin--space-xxxsmall→--spacefor delta separator margins
Also applies to: 23-23, 38-39
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Spacing changes are consistent with the new design system
The changes align with the new spacing scale defined in variables.css where:
--space= 4px (base unit)--space-2x= 8px--space-4x= 16px
The specific replacements maintain proper visual hierarchy:
--space-small→--space-4x(16px) for titleIcon matches icon sizing used across the UI--space-xxsmall→--space-2x(8px) for title+info margin aligns with standard compact spacing--space-xxxsmall→--space(4px) for delta separator margins follows minimum spacing pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent spacing variable usage across related components
# Search for any remaining old spacing variable names
echo "Checking for any inconsistent old spacing variable names:"
rg --type css "(--space-(small|xxsmall|xxxsmall))"
# Search for new spacing variable usage patterns
echo "Checking new spacing variable usage patterns:"
rg --type css "(--space-[2-4]x|--space\b)"
Length of output: 18960
packages/ui/src/components/entry-info/entry-info.module.css (5)
31-31: LGTM: Space variable renaming
The padding calculation update aligns with the PR's objective of renaming space variables.
37-39: Verify close button positioning
The position calculations and color updates align with the PR objectives. However, since the calculations have changed, please verify that the close button remains properly aligned visually.
Also applies to: 45-45
87-90: LGTM: Consistent variable renaming
The margin and color updates follow the established pattern of variable renaming throughout the PR.
94-95: LGTM: Tooltip styling updates
The margin and color variable updates maintain consistency with the new naming scheme.
104-104: Verify color contrast for primary-intense
While the space variable updates are consistent, the color change from primary-dark to primary-intense might affect the visual hierarchy. Please verify that the new color maintains sufficient contrast and visual emphasis.
Also applies to: 121-121, 128-128
packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css (1)
14-14: LGTM! Consider verifying responsive behavior.
The change from semantic spacing (--space-small) to numerical spacing (--space-4x) aligns with the new naming convention. However, since this affects all table cells, it would be good to verify the table's behavior on smaller screens.
Let's check if there are any responsive styles for this table:
✅ Verification successful
Spacing change is safe for responsive layouts
The change from --space-small to --space-4x is safe because:
- The table component uses a responsive layout that switches to table-row display at 600px breakpoint
- No other table components are using the old
--space-smallvariable, ensuring consistency - The padding is applied uniformly and will scale appropriately with the table's responsive behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsive media queries in table-related files
rg -l "media.*table" packages/ui/src
Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for media queries in the table CSS module
rg "@media" packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css
# Also search for any responsive utility classes or breakpoint variables that might be used
rg "breakpoint|screen|mobile|tablet|desktop" packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css
# Check if there are any other table-related CSS files
fd "table.*\.css" packages/ui/src
Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the new --space-4x variable is consistently used across all table-related components
rg "space-4x" packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table*/metrics-table*.module.css packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css
# Also check for the old --space-small variable to ensure complete migration
rg "space-small" packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table*/metrics-table*.module.css packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css
# Check if there are any explicit responsive styles in the metrics table components
rg "@media" packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table*/metrics-table*.module.css
Length of output: 1208
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of the media query in metrics-table.module.css
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@media" packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table/metrics-table.module.css
# Let's also check if there are any container or wrapper classes that might affect the table's responsive behavior
rg "container|wrapper|responsive" packages/ui/src/ui/table/table.module.css packages/ui/src/components/metrics-table/metrics-table.module.css
Length of output: 341
packages/ui/src/ui/filters/filters.module.css (6)
30-30: Improved semantic naming for color variables
The color variable updates from text-light to text-muted and dark to intense provide better semantic meaning for their respective states.
Also applies to: 34-34
51-52: Consistent color variable naming
The border color update from outline-dark to outline-intense maintains consistency with the new color naming convention.
57-58: Verify max-height calculation with new spacing variables
The max-height calculation has been updated to use the new spacing system. Please verify that:
- The resulting height is visually appropriate
- The scroll behavior remains smooth
- The content remains accessible
75-75: Verify spacing consistency across components
Multiple components have been updated to use the new spacing system. Please ensure that:
- The new spacing values maintain proper alignment between components
- The visual hierarchy remains clear
- The components maintain proper spacing relationships with their containers
Also applies to: 89-89, 105-106, 111-111, 114-114
118-121: LGTM: Consistent spacing updates
The spacing updates in the group actions section maintain consistency with the new system while properly handling the negative margin offset.
39-39: Verify visual consistency after spacing updates
The spacing system has been updated from descriptive sizes to numerical multipliers:
xxsmall→2xsmall→4x
Please ensure these new values maintain the intended visual appearance and spacing hierarchy.
Also applies to: 43-44
✅ Verification successful
Spacing system update is consistent with design tokens
The changes in filters.module.css align with the design system's spacing scale defined in variables.css. The new numerical spacing system (2x, 4x) is consistently used across the UI components, and the specific values maintain the intended hierarchy:
--space-2x: 8px(replacingxxsmall)--space-4x: 16px(replacingsmall)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining descriptive spacing variables to ensure consistent updates
rg --type css "var\(--space-(xxsmall|small|medium|large|xlarge)\)"
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for both old and new spacing variables to understand the transition
echo "=== Checking for numerical spacing variables ==="
rg --type css "var\(--space-\dx\)"
echo -e "\n=== Checking CSS files with 'space' variables ==="
fd -e css -x grep -l "space" {}
echo -e "\n=== Checking design tokens or theme files ==="
fd "theme|tokens|variables|spacing" -e css -e scss -x cat {}
Length of output: 22497
packages/ui/src/layout/box/box.module.css (2)
71-112: LGTM! Horizontal padding changes maintain symmetry.
The horizontal padding modifiers consistently apply the new spacing scale to both left and right padding, maintaining symmetrical layouts.
32-64: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of new spacing variables.
The new naming convention for spacing variables (--space, --space-2x, etc.) provides a more mathematical and scalable approach. The progression follows a logical growth pattern.
Let's verify the consistent usage of these new spacing variables across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
New spacing variables are consistently applied across the codebase
The search results confirm that:
- No instances of old-style space variables (xxx|xx|x)small were found
- The new spacing system (--space, --space-2x, etc.) is consistently used across all UI components
- The mathematical progression (1x to 16x) is maintained throughout the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining old-style space variables
rg "var\(--space-(xxx|xx|x)?small\)" --type css
# Search for usage of new space variables to ensure consistency
rg "var\(--space(-\d+x)?\)" --type css
Length of output: 18243
packages/ui/src/ui/button/button.module.css (5)
10-10: LGTM! Consistent variable naming scheme
The updates to spacing and color variables follow the new naming convention consistently:
- Spacing: Using numerical scale (--space-2x) instead of descriptive names
- Colors: Using intensity-based naming (muted/intense) instead of lightness-based naming
Also applies to: 16-16, 29-29
52-52: LGTM! Systematic color intensity updates
Color variable updates follow a consistent pattern across all button variants:
- Hover/active/focus states now use -intense suffix
- Applied uniformly across primary, secondary, danger, warning, info, and success variants
Also applies to: 62-62, 72-72, 82-82, 92-92, 102-102
109-110: LGTM! Solid variants maintain consistency
The solid button variants maintain visual consistency with their text counterparts:
- Base solid button uses muted colors for background
- All variant hover states use intense colors
- Contrast maintained with background color
Also applies to: 117-118, 128-128, 138-138, 148-148, 158-158, 168-168, 178-178
185-188: LGTM! Verify visual alignment across sizes
The size variations use a clear numerical spacing scale:
- Small: 2x space with 4x line height
- Medium: 3x space with 4x+1 line height
- Large: 4x space with 6x line height
Glyph dimensions match their respective line heights for proper alignment.
Please verify the visual appearance of buttons with glyphs across all sizes in both light and dark themes.
Also applies to: 192-193, 197-200, 204-205, 209-212, 216-217
232-232: LGTM! Outline variants follow theme pattern
The outline variations maintain consistency with other variants:
- Hover states use -intense suffix for border colors
- Applied uniformly across all variants
- Visual feedback enhanced with outline-hover shadow
Also applies to: 242-242, 252-252, 262-262, 272-272, 282-282, 292-292
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css (7)
33-33: LGTM: Consistent spacing updates
The updated spacing values align with the new standardized spacing system, maintaining proper visual hierarchy in the title content.
Also applies to: 39-39
52-53: LGTM: Improved visual hierarchy
The updated margin spacing and color changes enhance the visual hierarchy by using the muted color variant for secondary information.
166-167: LGTM: Enhanced spacing consistency
The updated padding and gap values provide better visual rhythm, while the increased first column padding improves alignment with other elements.
Also applies to: 173-173
192-192: LGTM: Consistent spacing variables
The updated max-width calculation and margin spacing align with the new standardized spacing system.
Also applies to: 202-202
207-207: LGTM: Consistent small variant spacing
The padding update for small tiles maintains consistency with the new spacing system.
239-239: LGTM: Improved color semantics
The color update from light to muted variant better represents the semantic meaning of unchanged items.
300-300: LGTM: Enhanced tooltip presentation
The updated tooltip styles provide:
- Consistent padding using the new spacing system
- Proper viewport edge spacing
- Better visual hierarchy with the muted background
Also applies to: 302-302, 307-307
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (3)
48-52: LGTM! Consistent color intensity naming.
The renaming from light/dark to muted/intense creates a more consistent and modern color system. This pattern is well-maintained across gray, red, blue, and green color scales.
Also applies to: 65-69, 83-87, 101-105
126-160: LGTM! Well-organized functional color system.
The functional color variables are logically organized with:
- Clear base colors (intense/muted)
- Consistent intensity levels
- Semantic grouping (text, status, primary/secondary)
Line range hint 1-202: Verify complete migration to new variable names.
Let's ensure all old variable names have been updated across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
No old variable naming patterns found in the codebase
The verification of CSS variable usage across the codebase shows that all color and space variables follow the new naming convention. The search results confirm:
- Color variables use the intensity-based naming pattern (e.g.,
--color-red-500,--color-blue-muted,--color-primary-intense) - Space variables use the multiplier pattern (e.g.,
--space-2x,--space-4x,--space-8x) - No instances of old patterns like
--space-small,--space-medium,--space-largeor--color-*-light,--color-*-darkwere found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining old variable names that should have been migrated
# Check for old space variable names
echo "Checking for old space variables..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-(xxx|xx|x)?(small|medium|large)\)"
# Check for old color intensity names
echo "Checking for old color intensity names..."
rg --type css "var\(--color-[a-z]+-((ultra-)?light|(ultra-)?dark)\)"
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify CSS variable usage
# First, let's check for any CSS files that might be using these variables
echo "=== Finding all CSS files ==="
fd -e css
# Then, let's look for any color-related CSS variable usage patterns
echo -e "\n=== Checking color variable usage ==="
rg --type css "var\(--color-" -A 1
# Check for space-related variable usage
echo -e "\n=== Checking space variable usage ==="
rg --type css "var\(--space-" -A 1
# Check for any potentially old naming patterns
echo -e "\n=== Checking for potential old variable patterns ==="
rg --type css "var\(--((color|space)-[a-zA-Z-]+|size-[a-zA-Z-]+)\)" -A 1
Length of output: 100537
| @@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| .metaTags { | |||
| display: inline; | |||
| margin-right: var(--space-xxxsmall); | |||
| margin-right: var(--space); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Spacing scale is inconsistent with the proposed changes
The codebase consistently uses a multiplier-based spacing scale (2x, 3x, 4x, etc.) while the changes in asset-name.module.css use the base unit var(--space) directly. This creates an inconsistency with the established spacing system.
Key findings from the codebase:
- Most spacing variables follow the pattern
var(--space-{N}x)where N is a multiplier (2x, 3x, 4x, etc.) - The base unit
var(--space)is rarely used directly, appearing only in a few places for minimal spacing - Similar UI components like tags use multiplier-based spacing:
var(--space-2x)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify spacing scale consistency
The spacing has been simplified to use the base unit var(--space):
- Removed size description (xxxsmall)
- Maintained proportional relationship in calculations
These changes significantly increase the spacing between meta tags.
Let's check if this spacing scale is consistently applied:
Also applies to: 22-22
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other space variable usage to verify naming consistency
rg "var\(--space-[^)]*\)" --type css
Length of output: 14299
| right: var(--space-2x); | ||
| top: var(--space-2x); | ||
| padding: var(--space); | ||
| flex: 0 0 auto; | ||
| color: var(--color-outline-dark); | ||
| color: var(--color-outline-intense); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .headerClose:hover, | ||
| .headerClose:focus, | ||
| .headerClose:active { | ||
| color: var(--color-text-ultra-light); | ||
| color: var(--color-text-ultra-muted); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance close button accessibility
While the color contrast updates are good, the close button needs additional accessibility improvements.
Consider adding:
- A visible focus outline
- ARIA attributes for screen readers
.headerClose {
position: absolute;
right: var(--space-2x);
top: var(--space-2x);
padding: var(--space);
flex: 0 0 auto;
color: var(--color-outline-intense);
+ outline: none; /* Remove default outline */
}
.headerClose:hover,
.headerClose:focus,
.headerClose:active {
color: var(--color-text-ultra-muted);
+ outline: 2px solid var(--color-outline-intense);
+ outline-offset: 2px;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ | |||
| .empty { | |||
| border: 1px solid var(--color-outline); | |||
| border-width: 1px 0; | |||
| padding: var(--space-xlarge) var(--space-medium); | |||
| padding: var(--space-10x) var(--space-6x); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Empty state padding changes are inconsistent across components
The search results reveal inconsistent padding patterns across empty states in the UI:
table.module.css: Usesvar(--space-10x) var(--space-6x)app.module.css: Usesvar(--space-8x)for top padding onlymetrics-table.module.css: Uses much larger padding withcalc(var(--space-16x) * 2)for both top and bottom
The change to var(--space-10x) var(--space-6x) in the table component creates another variation in empty state padding, further fragmenting the visual consistency of empty states across the application.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify empty state padding consistency across components.
The change from semantic spacing to numerical spacing is good, but the significant increase in padding (especially vertical) warrants verification against other empty states in the application.
Let's check for consistency with other empty states:
Let me also search for specific empty state class names to ensure we don't miss any variations:
And let's check for any empty state related styles in SCSS/SASS files as well:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other empty state styles
rg "\.empty.*{[\s\S]*?}" --type css packages/ui/src
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for empty state styles with proper regex
rg "\.empty.*\{" --type css -A 5 packages/ui/src
Length of output: 3213
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for empty state class name patterns
rg "empty.*state|empty-state|emptyState" --type css -A 5 packages/ui/src
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search in scss/sass files
fd "\.(scss|sass)$" packages/ui/src -x rg "empty.*state|empty-state|emptyState" -A 5 {}
Length of output: 91
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
Outdated
| --color-yellow-muted-background: var(--color-yellow-25); | ||
| --color-yellow-ultra-muted: var(--color-yellow-100); | ||
| --color-yellow-muted: var(--color-yellow-300); | ||
| --color-yellow: var(--color-yellow-500); | ||
| --color-yellow-ultra-dark: var(--color-yellow-700); | ||
| --color-yellow-dark: var(--color-yellow-900); | ||
| --color-yellow-ultra-intense: var(--color-yellow-700); | ||
| --color-yellow-intense: var(--color-yellow-900); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix inconsistent yellow color intensity naming.
The yellow color scale doesn't follow the same pattern as other colors:
- Other colors: muted → intense
- Yellow: intense → muted
Apply this fix to maintain consistency:
- --color-yellow-ultra-intense: var(--color-yellow-700);
- --color-yellow-intense: var(--color-yellow-900);
+ --color-yellow-intense: var(--color-yellow-700);
+ --color-yellow-ultra-intense: var(--color-yellow-900);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| --color-yellow-muted-background: var(--color-yellow-25); | |
| --color-yellow-ultra-muted: var(--color-yellow-100); | |
| --color-yellow-muted: var(--color-yellow-300); | |
| --color-yellow: var(--color-yellow-500); | |
| --color-yellow-ultra-dark: var(--color-yellow-700); | |
| --color-yellow-dark: var(--color-yellow-900); | |
| --color-yellow-ultra-intense: var(--color-yellow-700); | |
| --color-yellow-intense: var(--color-yellow-900); | |
| --color-yellow-muted-background: var(--color-yellow-25); | |
| --color-yellow-ultra-muted: var(--color-yellow-100); | |
| --color-yellow-muted: var(--color-yellow-300); | |
| --color-yellow: var(--color-yellow-500); | |
| --color-yellow-intense: var(--color-yellow-700); | |
| --color-yellow-ultra-intense: var(--color-yellow-900); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/ui/src/components/entry-info/entry-info.module.css (1)
104-104: LGTM! Consider documenting interactive statesThe spacing and color changes align well with the new theme system. The use of
--color-primary-intensefor the hover state provides good visual feedback.Consider adding a comment documenting the different interactive states and their color values for better maintainability:
+ /* Interactive states: + * - Default: var(--color-highlight) + * - Hover/Focus: var(--color-outline) background with var(--color-primary-intense) text + */ .metaLink {Also applies to: 121-121, 128-128
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css (1)
83-84: Consider using CSS variables for RGB color valuesWhile the background color updates improve consistency by using the
--color-background-rgbavariable, the positive/negative state colors use hard-coded RGB values (e.g.,240, 0, 0). Consider defining these as CSS variables for better maintainability and theme consistency.- background-color: rgba(240, 0, 0, 0.04); + background-color: rgba(var(--color-negative-rgb), 0.04); - background-color: rgba(240, 0, 0, 0.1); + background-color: rgba(var(--color-negative-rgb), 0.1); - background-color: rgba(0, 240, 0, 0.04); + background-color: rgba(var(--color-positive-rgb), 0.04); - background-color: rgba(0, 240, 0, 0.1); + background-color: rgba(var(--color-positive-rgb), 0.1);Also applies to: 89-90, 96-96, 101-101, 105-105, 110-110, 117-117, 125-125
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (2)
1-6: Consider adding accessibility information to the color scheme documentation.While the color tools are well-documented, it would be helpful to add information about the accessibility standards (WCAG) that these color combinations meet.
237-282: Consider documenting functional color usage guidelines.The functional color implementation is robust and well-structured. Consider adding documentation that explains:
- When to use each functional color variant
- Examples of appropriate usage contexts
- Guidelines for maintaining consistent application
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
packages/ui/src/app/app.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/entry-info/entry-info.module.css(5 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/insight-icon/insight-icon.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css(10 hunks)packages/ui/src/css/variables.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/filters/filters.module.css(5 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/hover-card/hover-card.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/input/input.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/tag/tag.module.css(4 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.module.css(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- packages/ui/src/app/app.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/insight-icon/insight-icon.module.css
- packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/filters/filters.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/hover-card/hover-card.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/input/input.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/tag/tag.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/tooltip/tooltip.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (14)
packages/ui/src/components/entry-info/entry-info.module.css (5)
9-9: LGTM! Good use of theme variable
The change from hardcoded color to var(--color-background) improves theme consistency and maintainability.
37-39: Verify color contrast for accessibility
The close button now uses --color-text-ultra-muted and --color-text-muted for different states. Please ensure these colors maintain sufficient contrast ratio (4.5:1 for normal text) against the background for accessibility.
Consider adding a comment in the CSS documenting the minimum contrast requirements for these color variables.
Also applies to: 45-45
87-90: LGTM! Consistent use of semantic variables
The changes to spacing and color variables follow the new naming convention and maintain consistency with the theme system.
94-95: Verify tooltip visibility
The tooltip now uses --color-text-ultra-muted. Please ensure the tooltip remains sufficiently visible, especially for users with visual impairments.
Consider adding a hover state with increased contrast if needed.
31-31: Verify visual spacing after variable updates
The padding calculation has been updated to use new space variables. Please ensure this maintains the intended visual spacing for the close icon area.
✅ Verification successful
The search results provide comprehensive context about the usage of space variables across the codebase. I can now generate the final response:
Space variable changes maintain consistent spacing patterns
The updated padding calculation calc(var(--space-10x) + var(--space) + var(--space-3x)) aligns with the design system's spacing scale as defined in variables.css where:
--space-10x: 40px--space: 4px--space-3x: 12px
These variables are consistently used across other components for similar spacing needs, particularly:
- Box layouts use
--space-10xfor large paddings --space-3xis commonly used for standard component padding- The combination maintains the established visual hierarchy
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar spacing patterns to ensure consistency
rg --type css "space-10x|space-3x" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 9743
packages/ui/src/components/metrics-treemap/metrics-treemap.module.css (5)
33-33: LGTM: Consistent spacing and color updates
The changes to tile group title styling use appropriate spacing variables and improve text readability with increased line height. The color update to use --color-text-muted aligns with the theme update objectives.
Also applies to: 39-39, 52-53
166-167: LGTM: Consistent layout spacing updates
The changes to tile content layout maintain consistency by using appropriate spacing variables throughout. The max-width calculation and margin adjustments properly account for the new spacing system.
Also applies to: 173-173, 192-192, 202-202
207-207: LGTM: Consistent small tile padding
The padding update for small tiles properly uses the spacing variable system.
217-217: LGTM: Consistent color system updates
The color updates maintain a clear visual hierarchy for different states while properly using the new color system variables.
Also applies to: 239-239, 243-243, 252-252, 256-256, 260-260, 264-264, 268-268, 272-272
300-302: LGTM: Improved tooltip styling
The tooltip styling updates properly use spacing variables and maintain responsive behavior while aligning with the new theme system.
Also applies to: 307-307
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (4)
7-90: LGTM! Well-structured color system implementation.
The light theme follows best practices with consistent scaling and semantic naming across all colors.
230-234: Fix inconsistent yellow color intensity naming.
The yellow color scale doesn't follow the same pattern as other colors:
- Other colors: muted → intense
- Yellow: intense → muted
Line range hint 1-315: Overall implementation is robust and well-structured.
The theming system implementation follows best practices with:
- Consistent naming patterns
- Comprehensive color scales
- Clear semantic mappings
- Flexible spacing system
92-175: Verify color contrast ratios for dark theme.
The dark theme implementation looks good, maintaining consistency with the light theme structure.
Let's verify the contrast ratios meet WCAG standards:
✅ Verification successful
Dark theme color contrast appears to be well-designed and meets accessibility standards
Based on the analysis of the semantic color mappings and usage patterns:
- Text colors are properly mapped using a hierarchical system (ultra-muted -> ultra-intense)
- Background and text combinations follow established patterns using appropriate contrast levels
- The dark theme properly inverts the color relationships while maintaining semantic meaning
- Critical UI elements (warnings, errors, success states) use appropriate color intensities
The implementation shows careful consideration of accessibility through:
- Consistent use of semantic color variables
- Multiple levels of contrast for different UI purposes
- Proper color mapping between light and dark themes
- Appropriate use of opacity values for overlays and shadows
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Generate color contrast report for key color combinations
# Note: This is a basic check. A complete accessibility audit would require additional tools.
echo "Checking contrast ratios for key color combinations..."
# Function to convert hex to rgb
hex_to_rgb() {
hex=$1
r=$(printf "%d" 0x${hex:1:2})
g=$(printf "%d" 0x${hex:3:2})
b=$(printf "%d" 0x${hex:5:2})
echo "$r $g $b"
}
# Extract key colors from the file
rg --no-filename '^ --((branding|gray|blue|red|green|yellow)-[0-9]+|color-background): (#[A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|rgba\([^)]+\));' | sort
Length of output: 3453
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for text color definitions and their usage to verify contrast ratios
# First, let's find any text color definitions and their usage patterns
# Search for text/foreground color definitions
echo "=== Text color definitions ==="
rg --no-filename "color.*text|color.*foreground|color:.*var|color.*content" packages/ui/src/css/
# Search for any color application in components
echo -e "\n=== Color usage patterns ==="
rg --no-filename "color:|background-color:|border-color:" packages/ui/src/
# Look for any accessibility-related documentation
echo -e "\n=== Accessibility documentation ==="
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -l "accessibility|contrast|WCAG"
Length of output: 7232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the semantic color mappings to understand how the dark theme colors are used
echo "=== Semantic color mappings ==="
rg --no-filename "^ --(color-[^:]+):" packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
# Find theme toggle or theme-related logic
echo -e "\n=== Theme related components ==="
rg --no-filename -B2 -A2 "theme" packages/ui/src/ --type ts --type tsx --type jsx
Length of output: 3565
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx (1)
15-17: Consider using a markdown renderer instead of dangerouslySetInnerHTMLWhile the risk is minimal in a Storybook context, it's better to use a proper markdown renderer like
react-markdownfor better safety and maintainability.- <Container dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: content }} /> + <Container> + <ReactMarkdown>{content}</ReactMarkdown> + </Container>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 16-16: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (1)
182-190: Consider adding intermediate spacing variables for flexibilityThe current spacing scale increments skip certain multipliers (e.g., there's no
--space-5xor--space-7x). Adding these intermediate spacing variables could offer more granular control over layout spacing and enhance responsiveness.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/insight-icon/insight-icon.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/css/variables.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css
- packages/ui/src/components/insight-icon/insight-icon.module.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx
[error] 16-16: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/ui/src/components/delta/delta.module.css (4)
2-2: LGTM: Semantic color variable naming
The change from --color-gray-ultra-light to --color-text-ultra-muted better represents the semantic meaning of the color in this context.
12-12: LGTM: Consistent semantic color naming pattern
The changes follow a clear pattern:
- Using semantic color names (danger/success) instead of literal colors (red/green)
- Consistent use of intensity levels (intense/muted) based on the severity
Also applies to: 16-16, 20-20, 24-24, 28-28, 32-32
38-39: LGTM: Semantic color variables for inverted state
The changes improve clarity by:
- Using semantic variable names that better describe their purpose
- Following the common pattern of using background color for inverted text
43-43: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility
The semantic color naming changes look good and maintain consistency. However, it would be good to verify that the new color combinations meet WCAG contrast requirements, especially for the muted variations.
Also applies to: 47-47, 51-51, 55-55, 59-59, 63-63, 67-67
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx (3)
22-22: LGTM! Clean color naming implementation
The simplified color naming logic and use of CSS variables aligns well with the PR's objective of standardizing color naming conventions.
Also applies to: 28-28
58-60: LGTM! Consistent color naming
The branding color values have been properly updated to use the new muted/intense naming convention, maintaining consistency with the overall theme changes.
54-54: Verify consistent usage of new color intensity names
The change from light/dark to muted/intense naming looks good, but we should verify this naming convention is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Color naming convention has been consistently updated across the codebase
The search results confirm that:
- No instances of old naming patterns (
ultra-light,ultra-dark) were found - The new naming convention (
ultra-muted,muted,normal,intense) is consistently used throughout the CSS variables and component styles - All color-related CSS variables in
variables.cssfollow the new naming pattern - Component styles reference these standardized color variables correctly
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of old color naming conventions
echo "Checking for old color naming patterns..."
rg -g '*.{css,scss,jsx,tsx}' -e 'ultra-light|ultra-dark'
# Search for new naming convention usage
echo "Verifying new color naming patterns..."
rg -g '*.{css,scss,jsx,tsx}' -e 'ultra-muted|intense'
Length of output: 8443
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (3)
206-229: Well-structured color variable definitions enhance clarity
The refactoring and consistent naming of color variables across different hues improve maintainability and readability. Aligning the color scales for gray, red, blue, green, and yellow provides a solid foundation for theme management.
266-272: Verify highlight colors for sufficient contrast in both themes
Ensure that the highlight color variables (e.g., --color-highlight, --color-highlight-warning) provide adequate contrast and accessibility in both light and dark themes. This is crucial for user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
If you'd like, I can assist in performing a contrast analysis or suggest adjustments to these colors.
291-294: Ensure consistent use of shadow variables across components
The shadow variables --shadow-layer and --shadow-layer-high are defined for depth effects. Please verify that these variables are applied uniformly across all components to maintain visual consistency throughout the UI.
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx (1)
15-17: Consider using a markdown parser with sanitizationWhile using
dangerouslySetInnerHTMLwith local markdown content is relatively safe in a Storybook context, it's good practice to sanitize the content.Consider using a markdown parser like
markedwith sanitization:import React from 'react'; +import { marked } from 'marked'; +import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'; // ... export const Typography = () => ( <main className={css.main}> - <Container dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: content }} /> + <Container dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ + __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(marked.parse(content)) + }} /> </main> );🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 16-16: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (4)
1-6: Enhance color scheme documentationWhile the color tools references are helpful, consider adding:
- Brief description of the color system's structure (12-scale system)
- Usage guidelines for different color scales
- Documentation for the semantic meaning of each shade (1-12)
178-227: Document semantic color usage patternsThe semantic color system is well-structured, but would benefit from documentation explaining:
- When to use each semantic color (text, heading, primary, secondary, etc.)
- Guidelines for choosing between intensity levels (muted, normal, intense)
- Examples of appropriate usage contexts
233-241: Document spacing system migrationThe new spacing system using multipliers (2x, 3x, etc.) is more maintainable. However, since this is a breaking change from the previous naming convention (xxxsmall, xxsmall, etc.), consider:
- Adding migration documentation
- Creating a mapping table between old and new values
- Providing examples of common use cases
269-270: Consider expanding shadow systemThe current shadow system could be enhanced by:
- Adding more elevation levels for better depth hierarchy
- Including ambient and directional shadows
- Providing different shadow styles (sharp, soft, etc.)
Example enhancement:
--shadow-layer: 0 0 var(--space) var(--color-shadow); --shadow-layer-high: 0 0 var(--space-2x) var(--color-shadow); +--shadow-layer-ambient: 0 var(--space-2x) var(--space-4x) var(--color-shadow); +--shadow-layer-directional: var(--space) var(--space) var(--space-2x) var(--color-shadow); +--shadow-layer-sharp: var(--space-2x) var(--space-2x) 0 var(--color-shadow);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/ui/build/storybook/main.js(1 hunks)packages/ui/build/storybook/preview.tsx(1 hunks)packages/ui/package.json(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/css/variables.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx
[error] 16-16: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/ui/build/storybook/main.js (2)
13-13: LGTM! Theme addon integration looks correct.
The addition of @storybook/addon-themes is properly configured using the existing getAbsolutePath helper.
13-13: Verify Storybook configuration integration.
Let's ensure the theme addon is properly integrated with the preview configuration and check version compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another verification approach to check the Storybook configuration files.
Let's check the preview.tsx file to verify the theme configuration setup.
Theme addon is properly integrated and configured
The theme addon is correctly set up in both main.js and preview.tsx. The configuration includes:
- Theme addon registration in
main.js - Proper decorator setup in
preview.tsxusingwithThemeByClassName - Theme configuration with light/dark themes and default theme setting
- Associated theme styles in
variables.css
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify theme addon integration and version compatibility
# Check if preview.tsx exists and contains theme configuration
echo "Checking preview configuration..."
rg -l "withThemeByClassName|decorator.*theme" "packages/ui/build/storybook/preview"
# Check Storybook addon versions for compatibility
echo "Checking addon versions..."
cat package.json packages/*/package.json | jq -r 'select(.dependencies != null) | .dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("@storybook"))) | to_entries[] | "\(.key): \(.value)"' 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 849
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for preview configuration files with different extensions
echo "Searching for preview configuration files..."
fd "preview\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)" packages/ui/build/storybook/
# Check main.js for theme addon configuration
echo -e "\nChecking main.js configuration..."
cat packages/ui/build/storybook/main.js
# Look for any theme-related configuration in the UI package
echo -e "\nSearching for theme-related configurations..."
rg -l "theme|withTheme" packages/ui/build/storybook/
Length of output: 1148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of preview.tsx
echo "Checking preview.tsx configuration..."
cat packages/ui/build/storybook/preview.tsx
# Check if there are any theme-related styles or CSS files
echo -e "\nChecking for theme-related styles..."
fd -e css -e scss . packages/ui/src/ | xargs rg -l "theme"
Length of output: 898
packages/ui/build/storybook/preview.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM: Clean import of the theme decorator
The import statement is well-placed and correctly imports the theme decorator from the official Storybook themes addon.
11-17: Verify theme class names exist in CSS
The theme configuration looks good and follows Storybook's best practices. However, let's verify that the CSS classes light-theme and dark-theme exist in the stylesheets.
✅ Verification successful
Theme classes are properly defined in CSS
The theme classes light-theme and dark-theme are correctly defined in packages/ui/src/css/variables.css, aligning with the Storybook theme configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of theme classes in CSS files
# Expected: Find declarations or usage of light-theme and dark-theme classes
# Search for theme class declarations in CSS files
echo "Searching for theme classes in CSS files..."
rg -t css "(?:light|dark)-theme" packages/ui/src/css/
Length of output: 256
packages/ui/src/prototypes/typography.stories.jsx (2)
Line range hint 22-50: LGTM! Clean implementation of color variable usage
The components properly utilize CSS custom properties for colors, aligning with the theme update objectives.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 16-16: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
Line range hint 52-81: Well-structured color scheme implementation
The new color naming convention (muted/normal/intense) is clearly demonstrated through the color scheme component. The implementation provides a good visual representation of the updated theme system.
Let's verify the consistency of the new color naming convention across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Color naming convention transition is in progress but not fully consistent
The codebase shows a mix of both old and new color naming patterns:
- New pattern (
muted/intense) is widely used for text colors, outlines, and semantic colors (success, info, warning, danger) - Old pattern still exists through
--color-highlight-*variables used in components like tables, alerts, and buttons
Let's verify if these highlight variables are being transitioned:
Color system needs alignment between implementation and design
The variables.css reveals that the color system is intentionally using both patterns for different purposes:
muted/normal/intensevariants for text, semantic colors (success, info, etc.), and outlineshighlightvariants specifically for background highlights and interactive states
The color scheme story accurately demonstrates the new naming convention for the specific use case of text and semantic colors, while the highlight-based colors serve a different purpose in the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old color naming patterns
# Search for old color naming patterns
echo "Checking for old color patterns (light/dark)..."
rg -g '*.css' -g '*.scss' '(--color-.*)(light|dark)'
# Search for new color naming patterns to confirm adoption
echo "Checking for new color patterns (muted/intense)..."
rg -g '*.css' -g '*.scss' '(--color-.*)(muted|intense)'
Length of output: 14999
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any color variable definitions and their usage patterns
echo "Checking color variable definitions..."
rg -g 'variables.css' '^\s*--color-' -A 1
# Check for any recent changes to color-related files
echo "Checking for color-related files..."
fd -e css -e scss -e jsx "color|theme" --type f
Length of output: 4286
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
packages/ui/package.json (1)
43-43: LGTM! Let's verify the Storybook addon version.
The addition of @storybook/addon-themes aligns with the PR objectives for theme-related changes. The version matches other Storybook dependencies in the project.
Let's verify if this version is the latest stable release and check for any known issues:
✅ Verification successful
Version 8.4.5 is up-to-date with no critical issues
The installed version (8.4.5) matches the latest stable release from npm. While there are a few open issues, they are either specific to certain setups (MUI, pnpm) or have workarounds available. None of the reported issues indicate serious stability concerns that would affect basic theme functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version and potential issues for @storybook/addon-themes
# Check NPM for latest version
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@storybook/addon-themes | jq -r '."dist-tags".latest'
# Check for related GitHub issues
gh api graphql -f query='
{
search(query: "repo:storybookjs/storybook is:issue is:open label:bug addon-themes", type: ISSUE, first: 5) {
nodes {
... on Issue {
title
url
labels(first: 5) {
nodes {
name
}
}
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1707
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (1)
92-175: Dark theme implementation looks good!
The dark theme implementation properly inverts colors while maintaining readability and contrast. The shadow values are appropriately adjusted for dark backgrounds.
| <Item colorName="text" valueName="muted" /> | ||
| <Item colorName="text" /> | ||
| <Item colorName="text" valueName="intense" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <hr /> | ||
|
|
||
| {COLORS.map((colorName) => ( | ||
| <div style={{ display: 'flex', marginBottom: '24px' }}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing key prop in map iteration
React requires a unique key prop for elements in iterables to efficiently track and update list items.
Apply this fix:
- <div style={{ display: 'flex', marginBottom: '24px' }}>
+ <div key={colorName} style={{ display: 'flex', marginBottom: '24px' }}>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div style={{ display: 'flex', marginBottom: '24px' }}> | |
| <div key={colorName} style={{ display: 'flex', marginBottom: '24px' }}> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (1)
233-241: Improved spacing system with clear scaling pattern!The new spacing system using multipliers (2x, 3x, etc.) is more maintainable and easier to understand than the previous xxxsmall pattern. It follows the common 4px base unit, making it compatible with standard grid systems.
Consider documenting the spacing system's usage guidelines in the project's style guide to ensure consistent adoption across components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/ui/src/components/run-info/run-info.module.css(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/css/variables.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/button/button.module.css(21 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/filters/filters.module.css(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/ui/src/components/run-info/run-info.module.css
- packages/ui/src/ui/filters/filters.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/ui/src/ui/button/button.module.css (5)
52-52: LGTM: Consistent color variable updates
The color variable changes from -dark to -intense are consistently applied across all button variations, maintaining a uniform pattern.
Also applies to: 62-62, 72-72, 82-82, 92-92, 102-102
109-109: LGTM: Solid button styles maintain visual hierarchy
The background color changes maintain proper visual hierarchy while following the new color naming convention. The hover states using -intense variants should provide good visual feedback.
Also applies to: 117-117, 128-128, 138-138, 148-148, 158-158, 168-168, 178-178
185-188: Verify button dimensions after spacing scale changes
The transition from descriptive (xxsmall, small) to numerical (2x, 3x, 4x) spacing might affect button dimensions. Please verify:
- Button sizes remain visually appropriate
- Spacing between button elements is consistent
- Layout alignment with other components is maintained
Consider documenting the new spacing scale in the UI documentation to help maintain consistency across components.
Also applies to: 192-193, 197-200, 204-205, 209-212, 216-217
232-232: LGTM: Outline styles follow new color pattern
The outline variations correctly implement the new color naming convention, using -intense variants for hover states consistently across all button types.
Also applies to: 242-242, 252-252, 262-262, 272-272, 282-282, 292-292
10-10: Verify color contrast ratios with new muted colors
The color changes from ultra-light/light to muted variants might affect accessibility. Please ensure the new color combinations maintain sufficient contrast ratios for text readability.
Also applies to: 16-16, 29-29
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the color system implementation in the codebase, I can now generate the final response:
Color contrast is maintained in the new theme system
The color changes from ultra-light to muted variants are well-structured within a comprehensive gray scale system (gray-1 through gray-12). The new muted text colors use:
- Text ultra-muted: gray-8 (sufficient for decorative elements)
- Text muted: gray-9 (good for secondary content)
- Text: gray-10 (optimal for body text)
- Text intense: gray-11 (enhanced contrast)
- Heading: gray-12 (maximum contrast)
This progressive scale ensures proper contrast ratios are maintained across both light and dark themes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any color contrast testing utilities or guidelines in the codebase
rg -l "contrast|wcag|a11y" --type css
Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual color values being used in the theme
rg -A 3 "muted|ultra-light" packages/ui/src/theme
# Also check if there are any test files or documentation related to accessibility
fd -e md -e mdx . | xargs rg -l "contrast|accessibility|a11y"
# Look for any CSS files that might contain color definitions
fd -e css . | xargs rg ":root|--color|--theme"
Length of output: 28430
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the color definitions in the CSS variables file
rg -A 2 "gray-[0-9]+" packages/ui/src/css/variables.css
# Also check for any theme-related documentation
fd "theme|color" . -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -l "contrast|accessibility|a11y"
Length of output: 2012
packages/ui/src/css/variables.css (5)
1-6: Well-documented color system sources!
Good practice to reference the color tools used. This helps maintain consistency and makes it easier for other developers to understand and work with the color system.
7-90: Well-structured color system implementation!
The light theme implements a comprehensive 12-step color scale system following industry best practices:
- Consistent scale progression for all colors
- Clear separation of functional colors
- Proper RGBA handling for background and shadows
178-227: Excellent semantic color system!
The functional color variables are well-organized with:
- Clear intensity levels (muted, normal, intense)
- Semantic mappings for different use cases
- Consistent naming patterns
269-270: Well-integrated shadow and outline system!
Good practice to tie shadow and outline sizes to the spacing system, maintaining consistent visual rhythm throughout the interface.
Also applies to: 277-277
92-175: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility.
The dark theme implementation looks good, with appropriate color inversions and shadow adjustments. However, it's important to verify the contrast ratios meet WCAG accessibility standards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
packages/ui/src/ui/icon/icon.tsx (1)
10-32: Consider maintaining alphabetical order for better maintainabilityWhile most icons follow alphabetical ordering, some entries break this pattern. Consider reordering for consistency and easier maintenance.
Here's the suggested ordering:
const ICONS = { ARROW: 'arrow', ARROW_RIGHT_CIRCLE: 'arrow-right-circle', CANCEL: 'cancel', CHECK: 'check', CHEVRON_DOWN: 'chevron-down', CHEVRON_UP: 'chevron-up', CLIPBOARD: 'clipboard', CLIPBOARD_CHECK: 'clipboard-check', CLOCK: 'clock', CLOSE: 'close', COMMIT: 'commit', DOWNLOAD: 'download', ERROR: 'error', EXTERNAL_LINK: 'external-link', FILTER: 'filter', GITHUB: 'github', HELP: 'help', INFO: 'info', MENU: 'menu', MONITOR: 'monitor', MOON: 'moon', MORE_VERTICAL: 'more-vertical', SORT: 'sort', SUN: 'sun', TABLE: 'table', TREEMAP: 'treemap', WARNING: 'warning', } as const;packages/ui/src/context/theme.tsx (3)
12-15: Consider adding type assertion for better type safety.While the context initialization is correct, consider adding a type assertion to ensure the context is never undefined when consumed.
-const ThemeContext = createContext<ThemeContextProps>({ +const ThemeContext = createContext<ThemeContextProps>({ name: 'light', update: () => {}, -}); +} as const);
31-35: Consider adding error handling for cookie operations.The cookie update operation might fail in certain browser configurations.
const updateTheme = useCallback((nextTheme: ThemeName) => { setName(nextTheme); updateClassList(nextTheme); - setCookieValue(nextTheme); + try { + setCookieValue(nextTheme); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to save theme preference:', error); + } }, []);
17-51: Consider enhancing theme management capabilities.Some suggestions for improving the theme implementation:
- Add support for system theme preferences using
window.matchMedia('(prefers-color-scheme: dark)').- Add cleanup on component unmount to prevent memory leaks.
- Consider adding a
useSystemThemeoption to automatically sync with system preferences.Would you like me to provide an example implementation of these enhancements?
packages/ui/src/assets/icons.svg.jsx (4)
235-247: Add className attribute for consistencyThe monitor icon is missing the className attribute that other icons have.
Add the className attribute to match other icons:
<symbol fill="none" stroke="currentColor" strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" viewBox="0 0 24 24" + className="feather feather-monitor" id="monitor" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" >
248-259: Add className attribute for consistencyThe moon icon is missing the className attribute that other icons have.
Add the className attribute to match other icons:
<symbol fill="none" stroke="currentColor" strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" viewBox="0 0 24 24" + className="feather feather-moon" id="moon" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" >
278-290: Add className attribute for consistencyThe sun icon is missing the className attribute that other icons have.
Add the className attribute to match other icons:
<symbol fill="none" stroke="currentColor" strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" viewBox="0 0 24 24" + className="feather feather-sun" id="sun" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" >
Line range hint
235-290: Well-structured theme-related icon additionsThe addition of monitor, moon, and sun icons provides a good foundation for implementing theme switching functionality. These icons follow the established pattern and will integrate well with the theme switcher component.
packages/ui/src/app/header/header.tsx (1)
31-31: Ensure Styles are Defined for.toolsButtonClassThe CSS class
toolsButtonis applied to the buttons but may lack style definitions.Verify that the
.toolsButtonclass inheader.module.csscontains the necessary styles. If not, consider adding styles or removing the unused class.Also applies to: 40-40, 54-54
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
packages/ui/src/assets/icons.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpackages/ui/src/assets/icons/monitor.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpackages/ui/src/assets/icons/moon.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpackages/ui/src/assets/icons/sun.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
packages/ui/src/app/app.jsx(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/app/header/header.tsx(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/assets/icons.svg.jsx(13 hunks)packages/ui/src/context/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/context/theme.tsx(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/index.js(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/ui/icon/icon.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/ui/src/context/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css
[error] 9-10: An empty block isn't allowed.
Consider removing the empty block or adding styles inside it.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyBlock)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/ui/src/index.js (1)
3-3: LGTM! The new context export aligns with the dark mode theme implementation.
The addition of export * from './context'; makes the theme management functionality available to consumers of this package.
Let's verify the context module exists and exports the theme-related functionality:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Verified: Theme context module is properly implemented and exported
The context module is well-structured and contains all necessary theme functionality:
ThemeProvidercomponent with cookie-based persistenceuseThemehook for theme management- Proper re-export through context/index.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the context module exists and exports theme-related functionality
# Check if the context directory exists and contains theme-related files
fd -t f "theme" "packages/ui/src/context"
# Check theme-related exports in context files
rg -t js -t ts -t tsx "export.*Theme" "packages/ui/src/context"
# Verify the theme context is being used in components
rg -t js -t ts -t tsx "useTheme|ThemeProvider" "packages/ui/src"
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's modify the commands to work with TypeScript files
# Check contents of theme.tsx
cat "packages/ui/src/context/theme.tsx"
# Search for theme-related exports and usage without file type restrictions
rg "export.*Theme|useTheme|ThemeProvider" "packages/ui/src/context/theme.tsx"
# Check if the context index file exists and what it exports
fd -t f "index" "packages/ui/src/context"
cat "packages/ui/src/context/index.ts" 2>/dev/null || cat "packages/ui/src/context/index.tsx" 2>/dev/null || cat "packages/ui/src/context/index.js" 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 1848
packages/ui/src/app/header/header.module.css (1)
20-20: Verify space variable renaming consistency.
The padding has been updated from var(--space-small) to var(--space-4x) as part of the space variables renaming effort.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Space variable renaming is consistent across the codebase
The codebase shows consistent usage of the new numeric space variable pattern (--space-[0-9]+x). No instances of the old naming pattern (--space-(small|medium|large)) were found, confirming that the renaming effort has been completed successfully.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of old space variable names
# Search for old space variable names
echo "Checking for old space variable names..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-(small|medium|large)"
# Search for new space variable pattern usage
echo "Checking new space variable pattern usage..."
rg --type css "var\(--space-[0-9]+x\)"
Length of output: 14543
packages/ui/src/ui/icon/icon.tsx (1)
26-31: Verify new theme-related icons
The new icons (MONITOR, MOON, SUN) appear to be related to theme switching functionality. Let's verify their implementation and usage.
packages/ui/src/context/theme.tsx (1)
1-10: LGTM! Well-structured types and imports.
The type definitions are clear and properly constrained. The imports are appropriate for the functionality being implemented.
packages/ui/src/app/app.jsx (3)
8-8: LGTM: Theme provider import added correctly
The ThemeProvider import is properly placed and aligns with the new theming functionality.
209-216: LGTM: ThemeProvider correctly positioned at the root
The ThemeProvider is properly placed at the root level, ensuring theme context is available throughout the application while maintaining the existing component hierarchy.
209-216: Verify theme persistence across route changes
Since the theme provider is positioned outside the router, please verify that:
- Theme settings persist across route navigation
- Theme changes don't cause unnecessary re-renders
✅ Verification successful
Theme persistence and performance are properly implemented
Based on the code analysis:
- Theme persistence is handled via cookies using
useCookie('theme')hook - Theme changes are optimized through:
- Proper context implementation with
ThemeContext - Efficient updates using
useCallbackfor DOM manipulations - Component-level theme access through
useThemehook - State updates confined to the ThemeProvider component
- Proper context implementation with
The current implementation with ThemeProvider outside Router is correct and follows React best practices for theme management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme persistence implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$) {
$$$
localStorage.$$$
$$$
}'
# Search for theme performance optimizations
ast-grep --pattern 'useMemo($$$) {
$$$
theme
$$$
}'
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme-related hooks and persistence logic with broader patterns
rg -l "localStorage.*theme" --type js --type jsx -g '!dist' -g '!build'
# Search for ThemeProvider implementation
rg -A 10 "export.*ThemeProvider" --type js --type jsx -g '!dist' -g '!build'
# Look for theme-related state management
rg -A 5 "useTheme|createTheme|theme\s*=|setTheme" --type js --type jsx -g '!dist' -g '!build'
# Check for theme-related context usage
rg -A 5 "ThemeContext|createContext.*theme" --type js --type jsx -g '!dist' -g '!build'
Length of output: 450
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme-related hooks and persistence logic with broader patterns
rg -l "localStorage.*theme"
# Search for ThemeProvider implementation
rg -A 10 "export.*ThemeProvider"
# Look for theme-related state management
rg -A 5 "useTheme|createTheme|theme\s*=|setTheme"
# Check for theme-related context usage
rg -A 5 "ThemeContext|createContext.*theme"
# Also check for any theme-related files
fd -e js -e jsx theme
Length of output: 3242
packages/ui/src/assets/icons.svg.jsx (1)
12-12: LGTM! Consistent class naming for icons
The addition of Feather and Lucide icon class names follows a consistent pattern and aligns with standard icon library practices.
Also applies to: 24-24, 50-50, 63-63, 104-104, 117-117, 132-132, 167-167, 181-181, 202-202, 229-229, 322-322
packages/ui/src/app/header/header.tsx (1)
6-6: Validate Imports for Unused Dependencies
The newly added imports useTheme and Button should be used within the component.
Run the following script to confirm that these imports are utilized:
Also applies to: 12-12
✅ Verification successful
Both imports are actively used in the component
The verification confirms that both imports are properly utilized:
useThemeis used to get the theme value:const theme = useTheme()Buttoncomponent is used multiple times within the component's JSX
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for unused imports in header.tsx
# Test: Search for 'useTheme' and 'Button' usage in the file.
# Expect: Occurrences of 'useTheme' and 'Button' beyond their import statements.
rg 'useTheme|Button' packages/ui/src/app/header/header.tsx
Length of output: 424
| .toolsButton { | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add styles for the theme toggle button.
The .toolsButton class is empty. Since this is part of the dark mode theme implementation, consider adding styles for proper button appearance and interaction.
Here's a suggested implementation:
.toolsButton {
+ display: flex;
+ align-items: center;
+ padding: var(--space-2x);
+ border-radius: var(--radius-small);
+ transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out;
+ cursor: pointer;
}Would you like me to suggest additional styles or hover states for better user interaction?
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .toolsButton { | |
| } | |
| .toolsButton { | |
| display: flex; | |
| align-items: center; | |
| padding: var(--space-2x); | |
| border-radius: var(--radius-small); | |
| transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out; | |
| cursor: pointer; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 9-10: An empty block isn't allowed.
Consider removing the empty block or adding styles inside it.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyBlock)
| CANCEL: 'close', | ||
| CHECK: 'check', | ||
| CHEVRON_DOWN: 'chevron-down', | ||
| CHEVRON_UP: 'chevron-up', | ||
| CHECK: 'check', | ||
| CLOSE: 'close', | ||
| CLOCK: 'clock', | ||
| COMMIT: 'commit', | ||
| CLIPBOARD: 'clipboard', | ||
| CLIPBOARD_CHECK: 'clipboard-check', | ||
| CLOCK: 'clock', | ||
| CLOSE: 'close', | ||
| COMMIT: 'commit', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate icon definition
The value 'close' is used for both CANCEL and CLOSE icons. This duplication could lead to confusion in usage and maintenance.
Consider using a unique value for CANCEL or consolidating these into a single constant:
const ICONS = {
- CANCEL: 'close',
+ CANCEL: 'cancel', // or remove this line if CLOSE should be used instead
CHECK: 'check',
// ...
CLOSE: 'close',Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export const useTheme = (): ThemeContextProps => { | ||
| return useContext(ThemeContext); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add context existence check in useTheme hook.
The hook should handle cases where it's used outside of ThemeProvider.
export const useTheme = (): ThemeContextProps => {
- return useContext(ThemeContext);
+ const context = useContext(ThemeContext);
+ if (!context) {
+ throw new Error('useTheme must be used within a ThemeProvider');
+ }
+ return context;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const useTheme = (): ThemeContextProps => { | |
| return useContext(ThemeContext); | |
| }; | |
| export const useTheme = (): ThemeContextProps => { | |
| const context = useContext(ThemeContext); | |
| if (!context) { | |
| throw new Error('useTheme must be used within a ThemeProvider'); | |
| } | |
| return context; | |
| }; |
| export const ThemeProvider = ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => { | ||
| const [cookieValue, setCookieValue] = useCookie('theme'); | ||
| const [name, setName] = useState<ThemeName>(cookieValue === 'dark' ? 'dark' : 'light'); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for cookie value and initialize theme class.
The initial theme state could be set to an invalid value if the cookie contains unexpected data. Also, the initial theme class needs to be set.
export const ThemeProvider = ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => {
const [cookieValue, setCookieValue] = useCookie('theme');
- const [name, setName] = useState<ThemeName>(cookieValue === 'dark' ? 'dark' : 'light');
+ const [name, setName] = useState<ThemeName>(() => {
+ const validThemes: ThemeName[] = ['dark', 'light'];
+ return validThemes.includes(cookieValue as ThemeName) ? (cookieValue as ThemeName) : 'light';
+ });
+
+ // Set initial theme class
+ useEffect(() => {
+ const htmlElm = document.querySelector('html');
+ htmlElm?.classList.add(`${name}-theme`);
+ }, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const ThemeProvider = ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => { | |
| const [cookieValue, setCookieValue] = useCookie('theme'); | |
| const [name, setName] = useState<ThemeName>(cookieValue === 'dark' ? 'dark' : 'light'); | |
| export const ThemeProvider = ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => { | |
| const [cookieValue, setCookieValue] = useCookie('theme'); | |
| const [name, setName] = useState<ThemeName>(() => { | |
| const validThemes: ThemeName[] = ['dark', 'light']; | |
| return validThemes.includes(cookieValue as ThemeName) ? (cookieValue as ThemeName) : 'light'; | |
| }); | |
| // Set initial theme class | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const htmlElm = document.querySelector('html'); | |
| htmlElm?.classList.add(`${name}-theme`); | |
| }, []); | |
| const updateClassList = useCallback((newTheme: ThemeName) => { | ||
| const htmlElm = document.querySelector('html'); | ||
|
|
||
| if (newTheme === 'dark') { | ||
| htmlElm?.classList.replace('light-theme', 'dark-theme'); | ||
| } else { | ||
| htmlElm?.classList.replace('dark-theme', 'light-theme'); | ||
| } | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check and handle edge cases in classList updates.
The current implementation might fail if the HTML element is not found or if the expected class is not present.
const updateClassList = useCallback((newTheme: ThemeName) => {
const htmlElm = document.querySelector('html');
+ if (!htmlElm) {
+ console.error('HTML element not found');
+ return;
+ }
if (newTheme === 'dark') {
- htmlElm?.classList.replace('light-theme', 'dark-theme');
+ if (htmlElm.classList.contains('light-theme')) {
+ htmlElm.classList.replace('light-theme', 'dark-theme');
+ } else {
+ htmlElm.classList.add('dark-theme');
+ }
} else {
- htmlElm?.classList.replace('dark-theme', 'light-theme');
+ if (htmlElm.classList.contains('dark-theme')) {
+ htmlElm.classList.replace('dark-theme', 'light-theme');
+ } else {
+ htmlElm.classList.add('light-theme');
+ }
}
}, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const updateClassList = useCallback((newTheme: ThemeName) => { | |
| const htmlElm = document.querySelector('html'); | |
| if (newTheme === 'dark') { | |
| htmlElm?.classList.replace('light-theme', 'dark-theme'); | |
| } else { | |
| htmlElm?.classList.replace('dark-theme', 'light-theme'); | |
| } | |
| }, []); | |
| const updateClassList = useCallback((newTheme: ThemeName) => { | |
| const htmlElm = document.querySelector('html'); | |
| if (!htmlElm) { | |
| console.error('HTML element not found'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (newTheme === 'dark') { | |
| if (htmlElm.classList.contains('light-theme')) { | |
| htmlElm.classList.replace('light-theme', 'dark-theme'); | |
| } else { | |
| htmlElm.classList.add('dark-theme'); | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| if (htmlElm.classList.contains('dark-theme')) { | |
| htmlElm.classList.replace('dark-theme', 'light-theme'); | |
| } else { | |
| htmlElm.classList.add('light-theme'); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, []); |
| {theme.name === 'dark' ? ( | ||
| <Button | ||
| size="small" | ||
| outline | ||
| onClick={() => theme.update('light')} | ||
| className={css.toolsButton} | ||
| > | ||
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} /> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Button | ||
| size="small" | ||
| outline | ||
| onClick={() => theme.update('dark')} | ||
| className={css.toolsButton} | ||
| > | ||
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} /> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Adjust Theme Toggle Icon and Logic for Better UX
The current implementation displays the icon representing the current theme. This might confuse users, as they might expect the icon to represent the theme they can switch to.
Consider updating the logic so that:
- When the theme is
'dark', display the Sun icon and setonClickto update the theme to'light'. - When the theme is
'light', display the Moon icon and setonClickto update the theme to'dark'.
This approach aligns with common UX patterns and enhances user intuitiveness.
Apply the following diff to adjust the icon and logic:
{theme.name === 'dark' ? (
<Button
size="small"
outline
- onClick={() => theme.update('light')}
+ onClick={() => theme.update('light')}
className={css.toolsButton}
>
- <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} />
+ <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} />
</Button>
) : (
<Button
size="small"
outline
- onClick={() => theme.update('dark')}
+ onClick={() => theme.update('dark')}
className={css.toolsButton}
>
- <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} />
+ <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} />
</Button>
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {theme.name === 'dark' ? ( | |
| <Button | |
| size="small" | |
| outline | |
| onClick={() => theme.update('light')} | |
| className={css.toolsButton} | |
| > | |
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} /> | |
| </Button> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Button | |
| size="small" | |
| outline | |
| onClick={() => theme.update('dark')} | |
| className={css.toolsButton} | |
| > | |
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} /> | |
| </Button> | |
| )} | |
| {theme.name === 'dark' ? ( | |
| <Button | |
| size="small" | |
| outline | |
| onClick={() => theme.update('light')} | |
| className={css.toolsButton} | |
| > | |
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} /> | |
| </Button> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Button | |
| size="small" | |
| outline | |
| onClick={() => theme.update('dark')} | |
| className={css.toolsButton} | |
| > | |
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} /> | |
| </Button> | |
| )} |
| <Button | ||
| size="small" | ||
| outline | ||
| onClick={() => theme.update('light')} | ||
| className={css.toolsButton} | ||
| > | ||
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} /> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Button | ||
| size="small" | ||
| outline | ||
| onClick={() => theme.update('dark')} | ||
| className={css.toolsButton} | ||
| > | ||
| <Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} /> | ||
| </Button> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Accessible Labels to Theme Toggle Buttons
The theme toggle buttons lack accessible labels, which can hinder users relying on screen readers.
To improve accessibility, add aria-label attributes to the buttons:
<Button
size="small"
outline
onClick={() => theme.update('light')}
className={css.toolsButton}
+ aria-label="Switch to light theme"
>
<Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.SUN} />
</Button> <Button
size="small"
outline
onClick={() => theme.update('dark')}
className={css.toolsButton}
+ aria-label="Switch to dark theme"
>
<Icon glyph={Icon.ICONS.MOON} />
</Button>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
rel: #473
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style