-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding additional constraints to the VRP #103
Comments
yes, that's possible when the logic is used as a library (rust crate). You would need to construct your own instance of VRP using desired constraints (wrapped by |
Is the solver able to handle tour length constraint?
…On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:48 PM Ilya Builuk ***@***.***> wrote:
yes, that's possible when the logic is used as a library (rust crate). You
would need to construct your own instance of VRP using desired constraints
(wrapped by Feature concept). If you're using library through json
pragmatic format, then it is not possible: this would require to support
some domain specific language to express constraints in some form (e.g.
AMPL).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#103 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYHL7QFYHJO7MA4JT62OXI3XGMWOJANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDBIEG4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
yes, there is https://reinterpretcat.github.io/vrp/concepts/pragmatic/problem/vehicles.html |
Is there any documentation on how to add additional constraint? I'm not familiar with Rust crate. |
No, there is no comprehensive documentation how to extend the solver code wise, only how to use it with json as a command line application |
Is it possible to add additional constraints?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: