Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Reference for the PBC QM/MM implementation #232

Open
YuzheZhang98 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Question] Reference for the PBC QM/MM implementation #232

YuzheZhang98 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@YuzheZhang98
Copy link

In the original PySCF, the QM/MM module supports only non-periodic boundary conditions (non-PBC). However, in GPU4PySCF, it seems that only periodic boundary condition (PBC) QM/MM is implemented. Is there any reference paper or documentation available for the PBC QM/MM implementation in GPU4PySCF? Additionally, is it feasible to convert the QM/MM class between PySCF and GPU4PySCF in a convenient way?

@wxj6000
Copy link
Collaborator

wxj6000 commented Nov 1, 2024

Here is the reference for PBC QM/MM https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03273
@MoleOrbitalHybridAnalyst Do you have the plan to keep the consistency between GPU4PySCF and PySCF, in terms of QM/MM?

@MoleOrbitalHybridAnalyst
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, you can find a CPU version of PBC QM/MM here https://github.com/MoleOrbitalHybridAnalyst/pyscf/tree/qmmm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants