-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V1 support #2
Comments
I would recommend providing two stable Docker images (for pyRDDLGym v1 and v2) via Docker Hub. This guarantees that the images will work and saves users the time-consuming build process. For this we have to keep in mind:
It would probably be best to add this information as a |
Hi, Thanks for your feedback about it. I agree with most points, especially about hosting a docker image on Hub. The issues mentioned are fixed in 2.0, but not yet in 1.4. The pyrddlgym-project/pyRDDLGym#238 is only partially fixed, since there may still be boundary cases that are not handled in the fix (but it should work for all of the typical cases and existing domains that exist). I think it's mainly a matter of backporting all these fixes into 1.4.4. We need to decide whether its worth doing all this and changing 1.4.4 in order to support 1.x in the Prost. Functionally, I do not see any point myself because the user does not interact with the pyRDDLGym server in any way with the current setup when running the docker images. For consistency, there is also no longer support for 1.4 and all of the other baselines, and likely will not be. |
I agree, that supporting pyRDDLGym 1.x wouldn't bring any benefits as the (Prost) results will be the same. With
I meant the released package. But since the Dockerfile always pulls the latest pyRDDLGym version from Github, you're right, the problem is fixed. |
Branch for interaction with pyRDDLGym 1.x
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: