-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add rye and ruff, and local dependency for CI and development #287
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
26240c0
to
1c3d6cb
Compare
8b643dc
to
7e3fac2
Compare
b9a46e3
to
130c0ee
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only lint ci fails for strange reason.
@sydney-runkle lmk if you agree with these changes ^ and your ideas about what i just said in my first comment so I can then start working on playwright tests :) |
hi @ManiMozaffar thanks so much for contributing. I have a few thoughts:
(btw, we don't really have a default packaging choice right now - pydantic uses PDM, pydantic-core uses pure pip, internal stuff uses poetry, things we're about to release use rye) |
Let's not switch package manager at the same time as adding playwright tests. |
Hey samuel, thanks for quick check.
Agreed. I was wondering why you're not using rye in pydantic. I can rework PR to use rye instead. Makes much more sense. That pip dependency was kinda bad IMO.
I also asked Sydney some days ago, she also agreed to write test. Playwright is much better than selenium and other alternatives as for my experience, being frustrating depends on the what you test, and how much you test. Testing at correct amount with correct approach, wouldn't be frustrating to maintain. frustrating to run? maybe. that's why I was kinda against running it on pre commit hook.
That's why I made this PR. To first decide about package manager, then continue with writing test. Sorry for the branch name, should have renamed it. |
130c0ee
to
faa5697
Compare
c0207fe
to
4df4410
Compare
Ah also, looks like there are some changes with the |
Ok great, I'll rebase the branch tomorrow and do the changes requested @sydney-runkle |
@sydney-runkle build docs fails. I don't have the "PPPR_TOKEN", so I can't test and debug it locally. I'm not even sure why it's failing, it said it requires black to function, so maybe pip install black would solve it? but then why didn't it happen before this PR? i think the diagnostic might be wrong. |
Ah yes, this is a barrier we need to work on. This is bc of the documentation PR that I merged recently. The local failure makes sense, but I'm not sure why it's failing on CI. I'll look into this! |
Are you able to repro the |
|
What if you try |
Looks like the docs are failing on other PRs as well, so I need to fix that 🤧 |
Will work on the docs fix tonight. Might end up disabling the typescript docs for now until |
This should fix the docs issue (I'm hoping): #299. |
You should be able to rebase now :). |
@sydney-runkle still lint fails, not sure why. can't reproduce it locally. |
Remove old dependency style .txt Add PDM to demo project and linted project with ruff Add PDM to fastui and linted project with ruff Updated gitignore with pdm stuff Fix CI/CD
06888e7
to
fd55b2a
Compare
Rebased again, still happens, still can't reproduce it :/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your initial work on this. A few notes:
- Let's make sure that the
pyproject.toml
files only have information relevant to this project - I want to make sure we don't include any behavioral changes, just linting fixes and settings / dependency management
- We might want to bump to the latest ruff version now that some new ones have been released since this PR's opening.
Ping me when you'd like another review 🚀!
"fastapi>=0.110.2", | ||
"httpx>=0.27.0", | ||
"openai==1.10.0", | ||
"PYjwt>=2.8.0", | ||
"pydantic[email]>=2.7.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these all truly dependencies?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's not the pyproject for fastui, that's for the demo.
Yes they're all. but it shouldn't affect anyway, because demo itself is "dev" package right? it's not that we ship it to client.
line-length = 120 | ||
target-version = 'py38' | ||
lint.extend-select = ['Q', 'RUF100', 'C90', 'UP', 'I', 'D', 'T'] | ||
lint.extend-ignore = [ | ||
'D100', | ||
'D101', | ||
'D102', | ||
'D103', | ||
'D104', | ||
'D105', | ||
'D107', | ||
'D205', | ||
'D415', | ||
'T201', | ||
] | ||
lint.flake8-quotes = { inline-quotes = 'single', multiline-quotes = 'double' } | ||
lint.isort = { known-first-party = ['pydantic', 'tests'] } | ||
lint.mccabe = { max-complexity = 14 } | ||
lint.pydocstyle = { convention = 'google' } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should make sure these are consistent with what we're using in pydantic
in general - seems like a lot of ignores?
quote-style = 'single' | ||
|
||
[tool.coverage.run] | ||
source = ['pydantic'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems off
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true my bad, i tried to copy from pydantic's rule, some were dead codes.
'docs/*' = ['D'] | ||
'pydantic/__init__.py' = ['F405', 'F403', 'D'] | ||
'tests/test_forward_ref.py' = ['F821'] | ||
'tests/*' = ['D'] | ||
'pydantic/deprecated/*' = ['D'] | ||
'pydantic/json_schema.py' = ['D'] | ||
|
||
[tool.ruff.lint.extend-per-file-ignores] | ||
"docs/**/*.py" = ['T'] | ||
"tests/**/*.py" = ['T', 'E721', 'F811'] | ||
"tests/benchmarks/test_fastapi_startup_generics.py" = ['UP006', 'UP007'] | ||
"tests/benchmarks/test_fastapi_startup_simple.py" = ['UP006', 'UP007'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here - we don't need these in this repo
user = users[id - 1] if id <= len(users) else None | ||
if user is None: | ||
return demo_page( | ||
*tabs(), | ||
c.Text(text='User not found.'), | ||
title='User not found', | ||
) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer if we don't have any behavioral changes in this PR - just linting fixes!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True, but that's also on demo. It doesn't affect the real package.
Side note -> this change was made to fix type check issues Otherwise i'd have to use # type: ignore
description = 'FastUI demo project' | ||
authors = [{ name = 'Samuel Colvin', email = 's@muelcolvin.com' }] | ||
classifiers = [ | ||
'Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it? Haha
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores] | ||
'docs/*' = ['D'] | ||
'pydantic/__init__.py' = ['F405', 'F403', 'D'] | ||
'tests/test_forward_ref.py' = ['F821'] | ||
'tests/*' = ['D'] | ||
'pydantic/deprecated/*' = ['D'] | ||
'pydantic/json_schema.py' = ['D'] | ||
|
||
[tool.ruff.lint.extend-per-file-ignores] | ||
"docs/**/*.py" = ['T'] | ||
"tests/**/*.py" = ['T', 'E721', 'F811'] | ||
"tests/benchmarks/test_fastapi_startup_generics.py" = ['UP006', 'UP007'] | ||
"tests/benchmarks/test_fastapi_startup_simple.py" = ['UP006', 'UP007'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same thing, we'll want to clean these files up
For completeness I think this link belongs here: astral-sh/rye#1164 (comment) Seems like rye would be mostly in maintenance mode |
I'm going to write tests with playwright, but before doing that, I found repo a bit messy.
So I used PDM as it's conventional tool in pydantic teamSamuel asked to use rye instead.
I added some # type ignore, because this PR was not meant to fix all types.
about Playwright and ui test, since they usually take quite long time to pass, might make more sense to use "pre push hook" instead of pre commit? I find it very annoying to have some browser running on every commit :) (ofc I can ignore it, till last push, but that's also annoying hahaha)From samuel input, which I also very agree with, we don't need to run playwright tests on any git hooks. Only in CI :) and also a way to execute it manually. Will engineer this in next PR