Update issue metadata for all reviews

[lwasser]

All of our new software submission issues have metadata that look like this:

Submitting Author: David Nicholson (@NickleDave )
All current maintainers: (@NickleDave )
Package Name: crowsetta
One-Line Description of Package: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data.
Repository Link:  https://github.com/vocalpy/crowsetta
Version submitted:   
Editor: @cmarmo 
Reviewer 1: @rhine3
Reviewer 2: @shaupert
Archive: [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/159904494.svg)](https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/159904494) 
JOSS DOI: [![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05338/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05338)
Version accepted: v [5.0](https://github.com/vocalpy/crowsetta/releases/tag/5.0.0)
Date accepted (month/day/year): 03/28/2023

but older issues have something like this:

Submitting Author: Emily Jane McTavish (@snacktavish)
Package Name: Physcraper
One-Line Description of Package: Automated phylogenetic updating
Repository Link:  https://github.com/McTavishLab/physcraper
Version submitted:   v0.55
Editor: @NickleDave   
Reviewer 1: @bpucker 
Reviewer 2: @leomrtns    
Archive: https://zenodo.org/record/5512990
Version accepted: 1.0

We need to go through older issues and update metadata

• Pynteny: a Python package to perform synteny-aware, profile HMM-based searches in sequence databases #67
• crowsetta: A Python tool to work with any format for annotating animal vocalizations and bioacoustics data. #68
• Xclim : Xarray-based climate data analytics #73
• Python-graphblas: high-performance sparse linear algebra for scalable graph analytics #81
• taxpasta: TAXonomic Profile Aggregation and STAndardisation #84
• afscgap: Ocean health tools for NOAA AFSC GAP species presence data #93
• Jointly: A Python Package for synchronizing multiple sensors with accelerometers #45
• Devicely: A Python package for reading, timeshifting and writing sensor data #37
• OpenOmics: Library for integration of multi-omics, annotation, and interaction data #31
• Physcraper: Automated phylogenetic updating #26
• pystiche: A Framework for Neural Style Transfer #25
• Phenopype: a phenotyping pipeline for Python #24
• pyrolite Submission #20
• MovingPandas: Software Submission for Review #18
• Pandera: A flexible and expressive pandas data validation library. #12
• Nbless: Software Submission for Review (APPROVED & ACCEPTED) #7
• EarthPy: Software Submission for Review #3

For all issues we need to add:

• JOSS DOI:
  For all those older issues, we should add the following two things (some issues may have this already given Davids work):
• All current maintainers
• Date accepted (month-day-year)

[NickleDave]

Notes while doing this:

• For movingpandas I can't find the DOI or version to link to (on Zenodo or GitHub respectively)
• For phenopype I can't find the version to link to on GitHub, and I noticed the maintainer does not have a pyOpenSci badge

[lwasser]

Thank you for your work on this david!!

a few other notes for whomever takes this on at another time!
Three packages are missing date_Accepted :)

• - Oops, pystiche is missing date_accepted key.
• - Oops, Nbless is missing date_accepted key.
• - Oops, earthpy is missing date_accepted key.

And then i'm pulling from david's list above:

• For movingpandas I can't find the DOI or version to link to (on Zenodo or GitHub respectively)
• For phenopype I can't find the version to link to on GitHub, and I noticed the maintainer does not have a pyOpenSci badge

[isabelizimm]

Just an update on this issue: everything was unchecked to start from the beginning again with the updated metadata to include JOSS DOI. Everything that has been re-checked off will have the exact format of

• Submitting Author
• All current maintainers
• Package Name
• One-Line Description of Package
• Repository Link
• Version submitted
• Editor
• Reviewer 1
• Reviewer 2
• Archive
• JOSS DOI
• Version accepted
• Date accepted

and if anything is missing, I've been marking with N/A (including the slash).

[cmarmo]

I have removed the label as the all the packages have been checked: we just need to decide how to communicate about Nbless

[lwasser]

@cmarmo so sorry i missed this. i'll open an issue about nbless separately in our website repo. we created an archive package procedure in our software peer review guide (but rright now the navigation is broken so i need to fix that to get the link!) but essentially no author response after a year and no commit history means we archive it. i'll add a flag to the submission issue and then i'll also update the website (so i'll go ahead and make that website issue now). then we can close this issue. i really appreciate all of the work you did and @isabelizimm did on cleaning up our package submission history.

many many thanks!

[lwasser]

ok closing this via this issue