Maintainers are assigned the following scopes in this repository:
Scope | Definition | GitHub Role | GitHub Team |
---|---|---|---|
Admin | Admin | aries-admins | |
Maintainer | The GitHub Maintain role | Maintain | aries-askar committers |
Maintainer | The GitHub Maintain role | Maintain | [aries committers] |
Read | The GitHub Read role | Read | Aries Contributors |
Read | The GitHub Read role | Read | TOC |
GitHub ID | Name | Scope | LFID | Discord ID | Company Affiliation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
andrewwhitehead | Andrew Whitehead | Admin | cywolf@gmail.com | BC Gov | ||
dbluhm | Daniel Bluhm | Admin | daniel@indicio.tech | Indicio PBC | ||
blu3beri | Berend Sliedrecht | Maintainer | berend@animo.id | Animo Solutions | ||
dhh1128 | Daniel Hardman | Admin | daniel.hardman@gmail.com | Provident | ||
ianco | Ian Costanzo | Maintainer | iancostanzo@gmail.com | Anon Solutions | ||
nage | Nathan George | Maintainer | nathang@kiva.org | Kiva | ||
swcurran | Stephen Curran | Admin | swcurran@cloudcompass.ca | BC Gov | ||
WadeBarnes | Wade Barnes | Admin | wade@neoterictech.ca | BC Gov |
Name | GitHub ID | Scope | LFID | Discord ID | Company Affiliation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maintainers are expected to perform the following duties for this repository. The duties are listed in more or less priority order:
- Review, respond, and act on any security vulnerabilities reported against the repository.
- Review, provide feedback on, and merge or reject GitHub Pull Requests from Contributors.
- Review, triage, comment on, and close GitHub Issues submitted by Contributors.
- When appropriate, lead/facilitate architectural discussions in the community.
- When appropriate, lead/facilitate the creation of a product roadmap.
- Create, clarify, and label issues to be worked on by Contributors.
- Ensure that there is a well defined (and ideally automated) product test and release pipeline, including the publication of release artifacts.
- When appropriate, execute the product release process.
- Maintain the repository CONTRIBUTING.md file and getting started documents to give guidance and encouragement to those wanting to contribute to the product, and those wanting to become maintainers.
- Contribute to the product via GitHub Pull Requests.
- Monitor requests from the Hyperledger Technical Oversight Committee about the contents and management of Hyperledger repositories, such as branch handling, required files in repositories and so on.
- Contribute to the Hyperledger Project's Quarterly Report.
This community welcomes contributions. Interested contributors are encouraged to progress to become maintainers. To become a maintainer the following steps occur, roughly in order.
- The proposed maintainer establishes their reputation in the community, including authoring five (5) significant merged pull requests, and expresses an interest in becoming a maintainer for the repository.
- A PR is created to update this file to add the proposed maintainer to the list of active maintainers.
- The PR is authored by an existing maintainer or has a comment on the PR from an existing maintainer supporting the proposal.
- The PR is authored by the proposed maintainer or has a comment on the PR from the proposed maintainer confirming their interest in being a maintainer.
- The PR or comment from the proposed maintainer must include their willingness to be a long-term (more than 6 month) maintainer.
- Once the PR and necessary comments have been received, an approval timeframe begins.
- The PR MUST be communicated on all appropriate communication channels, including relevant community calls, chat channels and mailing lists. Comments of support from the community are welcome.
- The PR is merged and the proposed maintainer becomes a maintainer if either:
- Two weeks have passed since at least three (3) Maintainer PR approvals have been recorded, OR
- An absolute majority of maintainers have approved the PR.
- If the PR does not get the requisite PR approvals, it may be closed.
- Once the add maintainer PR has been merged, any necessary updates to the GitHub Teams are made.
Being a maintainer is not a status symbol or a title to be carried indefinitely. It will occasionally be necessary and appropriate to move a maintainer to emeritus status. This can occur in the following situations:
- Resignation of a maintainer.
- Violation of the Code of Conduct warranting removal.
- Inactivity.
- A general measure of inactivity will be no commits or code review comments for one reporting quarter. This will not be strictly enforced if the maintainer expresses a reasonable intent to continue contributing.
- Reasonable exceptions to inactivity will be granted for known long term leave such as parental leave and medical leave.
- Other circumstances at the discretion of the other Maintainers.
The process to move a maintainer from active to emeritus status is comparable to the process for adding a maintainer, outlined above. In the case of voluntary resignation, the Pull Request can be merged following a maintainer PR approval. If the removal is for any other reason, the following steps SHOULD be followed:
- A PR is created to update this file to move the maintainer to the list of emeritus maintainers.
- The PR is authored by, or has a comment supporting the proposal from, an existing maintainer or Hyperledger GitHub organization administrator.
- Once the PR and necessary comments have been received, the approval timeframe begins.
- The PR MAY be communicated on appropriate communication channels, including relevant community calls, chat channels and mailing lists.
- The PR is merged and the maintainer transitions to maintainer emeritus if:
- The PR is approved by the maintainer to be transitioned, OR
- Two weeks have passed since at least three (3) Maintainer PR approvals have been recorded, OR
- An absolute majority of maintainers have approved the PR.
- If the PR does not get the requisite PR approvals, it may be closed.
Returning to active status from emeritus status uses the same steps as adding a new maintainer. Note that the emeritus maintainer already has the 5 required significant changes as there is no contribution time horizon for those.