Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 8, 2021. It is now read-only.

Merging with evalica's pattern collection #1

Open
evalica opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Merging with evalica's pattern collection #1

evalica opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@evalica
Copy link
Member

evalica commented Feb 15, 2015

Hi.

I'm curious if you are interested in merging my patterns collection.
I've published it with GitHub pages in order for you to take a look and see how it looks http://evalica.github.io/patterns/

Possible problems:
A. from what I see with this repo, it's focused more on providing pattern images, than aggregating existing collections. What I have is more in the direction "Other Patterns Collections"
B. I haven't updated the collection since 2011. I've cleaned it a bit and removed deprecated links (evalica/patterns#3) but I haven't updated it since. This is one of the reasons I want to merge it here: maybe someone will be interested in making PRs with updates.
C. If we can merge it here, I guess we should change a bit the page ... to match the existing content in the repo or maybe even match a particular style we might impose for opensourcedesign pages. I don't know how exactly we would go and how much work it will involve.

I'm waiting for your input on the issue. Thanks

@bnvk
Copy link
Member

bnvk commented Mar 16, 2017

@evalica I don't know how I missed this question, it was when we were just getting setup. But YES, it would be great to merge your patterns in. Want to fork + send a pull-req with that?

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

@evalica any update? :) Maybe someone else is also interested in helping. I know @eppfel @Espina2 @elioqoshi are also interested in patterns and styleguides. :)

@evalica
Copy link
Member Author

evalica commented Apr 11, 2017

Didn't had time to handle it yet :)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants