Relationship(s) between funding and scholarly work?

[mconlon17]

A common need in the recording of scholarly work, prepatory to assessment and impact activities is to indicate that a work is the output of funding. So we have:

work relationship funding

where the work might be any scholarly work -- a paper, a dataset, a clinical trial, a project, a symphony, book etc. And "funding" might be any funding -- internal award, external award (grant), etc.

the relationship of primary interest is "output of" or "resulting from" as in

this paper resulted from that funding

We see these kinds of relationships in the pubmed system. There papers have "cites grant" and a list of NIH awards that helped support the production of the paper.

How should should relationships be modeled in the ISF? Do we need more elements, or are the existing elements sufficient to represent the relationships?