You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, vehicle_type is described here and shared between all the modes.
My question is should it be one list of allowed values for all modes? I assume allowed values should be separated per each mode.
Seems like it should be separated to each mode, like:
bicycle is related to micromobility
bus - passenger-services (?)
cargo_bicycle - micromobility
car - car-share
delivery_robot - delivery-robots
moped - micromobility
motorcycle - micromobility (?)
scooter_standing - micromobility
scooter_seated - micromobility
truck - car-share
other - ...
Could you please review this moment?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From my reading of the spec on Vehicles, vehicle_type does not vary per mode (unlike, say, vehicle_attributes, which does vary per mode).
The vehicle_type data type is also reused across a number of areas of the OpenAPI spec, including for things like requirements which as defined in the spec could contain any number of vehicle types.
Currently,
vehicle_type
is described here and shared between all the modes.My question is should it be one list of allowed values for all modes? I assume allowed values should be separated per each mode.
Seems like it should be separated to each mode, like:
Could you please review this moment?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: