You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have two add-ons, ism8 and wolfsmartset (you will need one or the other depending on the smart home interface installed in the heating system). When a user types "wolf" into the search field of the add-on store, I would like to see both add-ons shown.
Current behaviour is as follows: Whey I search for "wolf", I get only the latter.
The search mechanism seems to look at the name of the binding, but not at the description (which contains Wolf for both add-ons).
Your suggestion
Extending the search to the description field.
This may lead to a lot of false positives. Therefore, we might restrict this feature, e.g., use the description only if the search term has at least 3 letters.
Your environment
Additional information
We discussed adding the term "Wolf" to the binding name in openhab/openhab-addons#17747. This would basically mean that we rename the binding - not my preferred solution.
I do not know about the current implementation of the search and how easy it would be to extend it to the description.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
An alternative might be to add an optional xml element 'searchTerms' (or something similar). The description was never meant for this and might be causing false positives/unrelated results
The problem
openhab/openhab-addons#17682 (comment)
The search mechanism seems to look at the name of the binding, but not at the description (which contains Wolf for both add-ons).
Your suggestion
Extending the search to the description field.
This may lead to a lot of false positives. Therefore, we might restrict this feature, e.g., use the description only if the search term has at least 3 letters.
Your environment
Additional information
We discussed adding the term "Wolf" to the binding name in openhab/openhab-addons#17747. This would basically mean that we rename the binding - not my preferred solution.
I do not know about the current implementation of the search and how easy it would be to extend it to the description.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: