-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switching mappings from cross-reference annotations to SSSOM #3004
Comments
Feedback from Uberon editors in 21/08/2023 call:
|
In order to both minimise the disruption for editors and to make sure the SSSOM-based bridge generation plumbing is working fine, I plan to do the transition in two phases. Phase 1
In that phase, nothing changes for editors. Once we are satisfied with the pipeline and the new SSSOM-derived bridge files, we can switch to phase 2. Phase 2
|
This issue has not seen any activity in the past 6 months; it will be closed automatically one year from now if no action is taken. |
Phase 1 was completed with #3061. Phase 2 is still planned, but as it is not merely a technical issue (it changes the way editors will add / remove / modify mappings), it requires more thoughts and preparation. At the very least, we need to: 1. carefully define which SSSOM slots editors are expected to fill; |
This issue has not seen any activity in the past 6 months; it will be closed automatically one year from now if no action is taken. |
Currently, mappings between Uberon (and CL) taxon-neutral terms and corresponding taxon-specific terms from foreign taxon-specific ontologies are maintained under the form of cross-references (formally
oboInOwl:hasDbXref
) annotations on the Uberon (and CL) terms, as in this example:We (the tech support group) would like to switch to maintaining these mappings into an external file in the SSSOM TSV format. This would bring several benefits. Among other things, it would allow to:
One foreseeable downside is that the mappings would no longer be editable directly from within Protégé, and there is (at least now) no specialised editing tool to edit a SSSOM file. But the SSSOM TSV format has been expressly designed to be easily editable with a standard spreadsheet software or even a decent text editor, so it shouldn’t too much of a hassle.
If Uberon (and CL) editors agree with this change, the plan is to:
Step 4) is intended both for backwards compatibility (in case some applications downstream of Uberon are dependent on those cross-references and are not ready to consume SSSOM files yet) and for the convenience of editors (it will make the mappings “visible” – though not editable – from within Protégé, so that editors can know which foreign term a given term is mapped to without having to look it up in the external SSSOM file).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: