-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add taxon constraints to FAO #13
Comments
For now I think high level distictions are best, at the Ascomycetes vs Basidiomycetes level seems good. The main thing to be done is to do the initial plumbing so that you can add these. If you're working i oboedit this will take some futzing I'm afraid. Maybe we could explore keeping them in a separate file for now |
Yes it would be good to have "never in Ascomycetes" where possible so we can hide them from our community curators. Val |
@cmungall |
Ideally in the FAO, but this will take some work setting up as it involves imports. It's much easiest if all work is done in Protege thereafter. If that isn't a problem, I can make a pull request with the changes. (the source file can stay as .obo) |
@cmungall |
@cmungall |
is_a shouldn't be declared, it's built in
…On 10 Mar 2017, at 8:27, Diane O Inglis wrote:
@cmungall
I don't know why but the master file in GitHub is missing the
[Typedef] is_a whereas it is present in the same file in OBO Foundry
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#13 (comment)
|
See also geneontology/go-ontology#11313 (comment)
cc @thomaspd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: