Development Prioritization: Figures #2
Labels
development
Documenting aspects that need to be added into the repo
enhancement
New feature or request
Milestone
Coding in Figures
Each of the proposed figures in the list below will be coded in as function in the R folder. I am thinking additionally there will be a function that will plot common figures together based on their categorization or type of data they are plotting.
Determining Rank
The tables and figures proposed and reviewed by the steering committee were prioritized based on the number of votes they each table or figure received. The different between positive and negative votes determined rank. Objects with a difference above 3 were categorized as P1. Below 3 but equal to or greater than 0 were designated as P2, and anything below a zero was designated as parking lot. Objects ranked at 3 were decided either to be P1 or P2 depending on comments and the developers expertise. Objects within the rank were listed in descending order of difference and objects with the same value were placed in order based on developer expertise.
The proposed list of tables and figures can be found here.
*Note: Only NOAA internal employees can access this document.
Guide:
P1: revived the highest amount of votes from the steering committee and are incorporated into almost every stock assessment used for management advice
P2: medium priority items that are important but can pushed a little bit later in development
“Parking lot”: lowest priority for development; will still be added into the package for the first release, but is not needed as soon as the other tables; received lowest amount of votes/negative votes
() = category
D = data
ES = executive summary
AM = assessment mode
P = projections
High Priority (P1)
Medium Priority (P2)
Lowest Priority
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: