actually skip pixel calibration, using default calibration as startin…

[walshmm]

…g point.

Description of work

This pushes the skipPixelCalibration flag to just one place, and then actually sets the utilized place, ie on ingredients
Since pixel calibration was now actually being successfully skipped DiffractionCalibration ran into the issue of not having a starting diffcal table that pixel calibration would normally provide.

As per consultation of Malcolm, the default diffcal table is loaded from disk and used as the base in this case.
This has the secondary purpose of priming calibration for when we eventually add the ability to choose a starting calibration.

To test

Currently I kinda need help examining the data to confirm that it does what is expected.
I have confirmed codewise that pixel calibration is successfuly skipped when toggled, but the output workspace I was inspecting still kinda just looked the same.

I used the following in the diffcal flow.
59039
LA11b6

Link to EWM item

EWM#7617

Verification

• the author has read the EWM story and acceptance critera
• the reviewer has read the EWM story and acceptance criteria
• the reviewer certifies the acceptance criteria below reflect the criteria in EWM

Acceptance Criteria

The story is lacking explicit acceptance criteria, the title may suffice.

This list is for ease of reference, and does not replace reading the EWM story as part of the review. Verify this list matches the EWM story before reviewing.

• acceptance criterion 1
• acceptance criterion 2

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.48%. Comparing base (bb8cf23) to head (bb7a20a).
Report is 7 commits behind head on next.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/snapred/backend/service/CalibrationService.py	25.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next     #486      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.51%   59.48%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        4836     4840       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         2878     2879       +1     
- Misses       1958     1961       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[rboston628]

I'd strongly recommend not merging this right now, since the story I'm working on (7388 and the entire Epic 4161) is meant to completely refactor the entire diff cal process, including the pixel cal skip.

[rboston628]

PR #488 went in, so this should be safe to work on again

[rboston628]

I think it'd actually be better to remove this from the ingredients instead. It is only used within the service layer

[rboston628]

Some of this was taken over in PR #497 , and so this PR might no longer be needed,

[rboston628]

Since merger of PR #497, running from next.

Open diffraction calibration. Run for 46680 with skip pixel calibration on. The workspace list is empty.

Continuing, it loads the default diffcal table and goes to tweak peak.

Continuing, it gets to the save screen. Saving completes successfully.

However, trying to run without skipping, hitting error, then running again with skipping, generates this error:

[rboston628]

PR #507 fixed the remaining defect.

From next, run with 46680 and skip turned OFF. It pops up this error:

Then flip the toggle to ON, continue. Able to finish workflow: