Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🔷 [Epic] useRef Support #63

Closed
1 task done
mpeterdev opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

🔷 [Epic] useRef Support #63

mpeterdev opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Epic feasibility unknown P1 - Dev Expectations

Comments

@mpeterdev
Copy link
Collaborator

mpeterdev commented Sep 28, 2023 •
edited by andy-haynes
Loading

Tasks
Beta Give feedback
  1. Update Preact integration to support partial re-renders #138
    P0 - Release requirement performance
    andy-haynes
@mpeterdev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dependent on #23

@mpeterdev mpeterdev changed the title useRef Support 🔷 [Epic] useRef Support Oct 10, 2023
@mpeterdev mpeterdev mentioned this issue Oct 10, 2023
Closed
8 tasks
@andy-haynes
Copy link
Contributor

While researching #138 and reworking the Preact integration, I have an interim implementation for useCallback that appears to be working. Internally this relies on useMemo, which useRef also relies on. Once the Preact integration is updated we should have a clear path to a useRef implementation 🎉

@thisisjoshford thisisjoshford moved this to 🏗 In progress in NEAR dApp Developer Repo Tracker Dec 8, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in NEAR dApp Developer Repo Tracker Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Epic feasibility unknown P1 - Dev Expectations
Projects
NEAR dApp Developer Repo Tracker
Status: ✅ Done
Near.org Core Experience
Status: Done
RoC Engine
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mpeterdev @andy-haynes