Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

START_C not efficient #1

Open
Jonney3099 opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

START_C not efficient #1

Jonney3099 opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@Jonney3099
Copy link
Contributor

Jonney3099 commented Nov 4, 2016

For text of "12345Cabc" + '\n' + "aD" + '\n' + '\n' + "aEF", the most efficient is:
START_C 12 34 CODEB 5 C a b c CODEA \n SHIFTB a D \n \n SHIFTB a E F
or:
START_C 12 34 CODEB 5 C a b c SHIFTA \n a D CODEA \n \n SHIFTB a E F
The shortest is 20 Encoding words. But I get 21 words by GenCode128:
START_B 1 2 3 4 5 C a b c SHIFTA \n a D CODEA \n \n SHIFTB a E F

Look like START_C and CODE_C is not fully optimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant